ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

12 U.S.C. § 1831j — Depository institution employee protection remedy

submitted 76 years ago by Pub. L. 101-73 to r/title-12-BANKS-AND-BANKING · 508 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section protects employees who report possible legal violations, serious mismanagement, waste, abuse of authority, or specific substantial dangers to health or safety. It allows a timely Federal lawsuit and possible reinstatement, damages, or other relief, but excludes participants in violations and people who knowingly or recklessly give substantially false information.

(a) In general. (1) Employees of depository institutions. An insured depository institution may not fire or otherwise discriminate against an employee in pay or employment terms, conditions, or privileges because the employee, or someone acting at the employee’s request, gave a Federal banking agency or the Attorney General information about (A) a possible law or regulation violation, or (B) gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety by the institution or one of its directors, officers, or employees. (2) Employees of banking agencies. A Federal banking agency, Federal home loan bank, Federal Reserve bank, or person performing a function or service for the Corporation may not take such action against an employee because the employee or a person acting at the employee’s request reported those matters to the agency, bank, or Attorney General when the conduct was by (A) a depository institution or such bank or agency; (B) its director, officer, or employee; (C) an officer or employee of the reporting employee’s agency; or (D) the reporting employee’s employer or its officer or employee.

(b) Enforcement. An employee or former employee who believes subsection (a) was violated may sue in the proper United States district court before two years have passed from the discharge or discrimination. The complainant must also file a copy of the initiating complaint with the appropriate Federal banking agency.

(c) Remedies. If the court finds a violation, it may order the violating institution, bank, or agency to (1) reinstate the employee; (2) pay compensatory damages; or (3) take other proper steps to remedy past discrimination.

(d) Limitation. Protection does not cover an employee who (1) deliberately causes or participates in the alleged violation, or (2) knowingly or recklessly gives the agency or Attorney General substantially false information.

(e) Definition. For subsections (a) and (c), “Federal banking agency” means the Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the Comptroller of the Currency.

(f) Burdens of proof. The burdens of proof used under subchapter III of chapter 12 of title 5 govern adjudication of protected activity under this section.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general
(1) Employees of depository institutions

No insured depository institution may discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or any person acting pursuant to the request of the employee) provided information to any Federal banking agency or to the Attorney General regarding—

(A)

a possible violation of any law or regulation; or

(B)

gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;

by the depository institution or any director, officer, or employee of the institution.

(2) Employees of banking agencies

No Federal banking agency, Federal home loan bank, Federal reserve bank, or any person who is performing, directly or indirectly, any function or service on behalf of the Corporation may discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee (or any person acting pursuant to the request of the employee) provided information to any such agency or bank or to the Attorney General regarding any possible violation of any law or regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety by—

(A)

any depository institution or any such bank or agency;

(B)

any director, officer, or employee of any depository institution or any such bank;

(C)

any officer or employee of the agency which employs such employee; or

(D)

the person, or any officer or employee of the person, who employs such employee.

(b) Enforcement

Any employee or former employee who believes he has been discharged or discriminated against in violation of subsection (a) may file a civil action in the appropriate United States district court before the close of the 2-year period beginning on the date of such discharge or discrimination. The complainant shall also file a copy of the complaint initiating such action with the appropriate Federal banking agency.

(c) Remedies

If the district court determines that a violation of subsection (a) has occurred, it may order the depository institution, Federal home loan bank, Federal Reserve bank, or Federal banking agency which committed the violation—

(1)

to reinstate the employee to his former position;

(2)

to pay compensatory damages; or

(3)

take other appropriate actions to remedy any past discrimination.

(d) Limitation

The protections of this section shall not apply to any employee who—

(1)

deliberately causes or participates in the alleged violation of law or regulation; or

(2)

knowingly or recklessly provides substantially false information to such an agency or the Attorney General.

(e) “Federal banking agency” defined

For purposes of subsections (a) and (c), the term “Federal banking agency” means the Corporation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Comptroller of the Currency.

(f) Burdens of proof

The legal burdens of proof that prevail under subchapter III of chapter 12 of title 5 shall govern adjudication of protected activities under this section.

Source credit: (Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 967, § 2[33], as added Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, § 932(a), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 494; amended Pub. L. 102–242, title II, § 251(a)(1)–(3), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2331, 2332; Pub. L. 103–204, § 21(a), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2406; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, § 602(a)(61), (c), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2291; Pub. L. 111–203, title III, § 363(10), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1555.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1950Enacted · Pub. L. 101-73 · 103 Stat. 494
  • 1991Amended · Pub. L. 102-242 · 105 Stat. 2331, 2332
  • 1993Amended · Pub. L. 103-204 · 107 Stat. 2406
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-325 · 108 Stat. 2291
  • 2010Amended · Pub. L. 111-203 · 124 Stat. 1555

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-73 on 1950-09-21.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case