16 U.S.C. § 460bbb — Findings
submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-612 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 196 words · no verdicts yet
Congress finds that the free-flowing Smith River and its watershed have rare ecological diversity, scenic beauty, and strong fisheries, offering many recreation opportunities. Congress also finds that careful development can keep the watershed a strong economic contributor, and that federal-state-local cooperation can protect its unique values.
The Congress finds that—
the Smith River, undammed and free-flowing from its headwaters to the Pacific Ocean, represents one of the last wholly intact vestiges of an invaluable legacy of wild and scenic rivers;
the Smith River watershed, from the diverse conifer forests of the Siskiyou Mountains and unique botanical communities of the North Fork serpentine to the ancient redwoods along the river’s lower reaches, exhibits a richness of ecological diversity unusual in a basin of its size;
the Smith River watershed’s scenic beauty, renowned anadromous fisheries, exceptional water quality, and abundant wildlife combine with its ready accessibility to offer exceptional opportunities for a wide range of recreational activities, including wilderness, water sports, fishing, hunting, camping, and sightseeing;
careful development and utilization at mutually compatible levels of recreation, fisheries, and timber resources on public lands will ensure the continuation of the Smith River watershed’s historic role as a significant contributor to the region’s local economy; and
protection of the Smith River’s unique values can be enhanced by a cooperative effort by Federal, State and local governments to coordinate land-use planning, management, and development of Federal and non-Federal lands throughout the watershed.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 101–612, § 2, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3209.)
- 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-612 · 104 Stat. 3209
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-612 on 1990-11-16.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case