ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

17 U.S.C. § 406Notice of copyright: Error in name or date on certain copies and phonorecords

submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-553 to r/title-17-COPYRIGHTS · 391 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law covers copyright notices with a wrong owner's name or wrong date, on copies made before 1988. A wrong name doesn't change who owns the copyright, though an innocent misled user may have a defense. A wrong or missing date shifts how copyright terms are counted, or removes notice protection entirely.

(a) Error in Name. This applies to copies and phonorecords the copyright owner allowed to be distributed before the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 took effect. If the copyright notice on those copies names someone who isn't actually the copyright owner, that mistake doesn't change who really owns the copyright, or whether it's valid. But someone who innocently starts an infringing activity has a full legal defense if they prove they were misled by the wrong name, and started in good faith under what they believed was a valid transfer or license from the named person — unless, before they started, either (1) the real owner had already registered the work, or (2) a document proving the real owner's rights had already been recorded. The person wrongly named in the notice must account to the real copyright owner for any money they collected from licenses or transfers they granted. (b) Error in Date. If the year on the notice, for copies distributed before the 1988 Act took effect, is earlier than the year the work was actually first published, then any time period counted from first publication under section 302 is instead counted from the year printed on the notice. If the year on the notice is more than one year later than the actual first-publication year, the work is treated as if it were published with no notice at all, and section 405 applies. (c) Omission of Name or Date. If copies distributed before the 1988 Act took effect have no name or date that could reasonably count as part of the notice, the work is treated as published without any notice, and is governed by section 405 as it read the day before the 1988 Act took effect.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Error in Name.—

With respect to copies and phonorecords publicly distributed by authority of the copyright owner before the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, where the person named in the copyright notice on copies or phonorecords publicly distributed by authority of the copyright owner is not the owner of copyright, the validity and ownership of the copyright are not affected. In such a case, however, any person who innocently begins an undertaking that infringes the copyright has a complete defense to any action for such infringement if such person proves that he or she was misled by the notice and began the undertaking in good faith under a purported transfer or license from the person named therein, unless before the undertaking was begun—

(1)

registration for the work had been made in the name of the owner of copyright; or

(2)

a document executed by the person named in the notice and showing the ownership of the copyright had been recorded.

The person named in the notice is liable to account to the copyright owner for all receipts from transfers or licenses purportedly made under the copyright by the person named in the notice.

(b)Error in Date.—

When the year date in the notice on copies or phonorecords distributed before the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 by authority of the copyright owner is earlier than the year in which publication first occurred, any period computed from the year of first publication under section 302 is to be computed from the year in the notice. Where the year date is more than one year later than the year in which publication first occurred, the work is considered to have been published without any notice and is governed by the provisions of section 405.

(c)Omission of Name or Date.—

Where copies or phonorecords publicly distributed before the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 by authority of the copyright owner contain no name or no date that could reasonably be considered a part of the notice, the work is considered to have been published without any notice and is governed by the provisions of section 405 as in effect on the day before the effective date of the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2578; Pub. L. 100–568, § 7(f), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2858.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-553 · 90 Stat. 2578
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-568 · 102 Stat. 2858

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-553 on 1976-10-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case