ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

19 U.S.C. § 1605Seizure; custody; storage

submitted 96 years ago by ch. 497 to r/title-19-CUSTOMS-DUTIES · 152 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section requires seized customs-related property to remain with the appropriate customs officer. It also sets rules for storage and court jurisdiction.

All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws, or laws relating to the navigation, registering, enrolling or licensing, or entry or clearance, of vessels, unless otherwise provided by law, must be placed and remain in the custody of the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the seizure was made to await disposition according to law. Pending that disposition, the property must be stored in that place as, in the customs officer’s opinion, is most convenient and appropriate with due regard to the expense involved, whether or not the place of storage is within the judicial district or the customs collection district in which the property was seized; and storage of the property outside the judicial district or customs collection district in which it was seized must in no way affect the jurisdiction of the court which would otherwise have jurisdiction over that property.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

All vessels, vehicles, aircraft, merchandise, and baggage seized under the provisions of the customs laws, or laws relating to the navigation, registering, enrolling or licensing, or entry or clearance, of vessels, unless otherwise provided by law, shall be placed and remain in the custody of the appropriate customs officer for the district in which the seizure was made to await disposition according to law.

Pending such disposition, the property shall be stored in such place as, in the customs officer’s opinion, is most convenient and appropriate with due regard to the expense involved, whether or not the place of storage is within the judicial district or the customs collection district in which the property was seized; and storage of the property outside the judicial district or customs collection district in which it was seized shall in no way affect the jurisdiction of the court which would otherwise have jurisdiction over such property.

Source credit: (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 605, 46 Stat. 754; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213, title V, § 505, 68 Stat. 1141; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, § 301(cc), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 321, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2056; Pub. L. 98–573, title II, § 213(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2984.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1930Enacted · Act of June 17, 1930, ch. 497 · 46 Stat. 754
  • 1954Amended · Act of Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213 · 68 Stat. 1141
  • 1970Amended · Pub. L. 91-271 · 84 Stat. 291
  • 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-473 · 98 Stat. 2056
  • 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-573 · 98 Stat. 2984

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 497 on 1930-06-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case