ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

2 U.S.C. § 356Functions

submitted 59 years ago by Pub. L. 90-206 to r/title-2-THE-CONGRESS · 316 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A Commission must review pay rates each year for top officials in Congress, the courts, and the executive branch. The review sets proper pay levels and the right pay relationships between these jobs and other federal jobs. For executive branch positions, the Commission also checks whether their current rank still fits.

The Commission must conduct, in each fiscal year set out in section 352(8)(A) and (B) of this title, a review of pay rates for: (A) The Vice President, Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Speaker of the House, the Senate's President pro tempore, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and House. (B) Legislative branch offices and positions referred to in subsections (a) through (d) of section 203 of the Federal Legislative Salary Act of 1964. (C) Justices, judges, and other judicial branch personnel referred to in section 403 of the Federal Judicial Salary Act of 1964 — except bankruptcy judges, but including judges of the United States Court of Federal Claims. (D) Offices and positions under the Executive Schedule in subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5. (E) The Governors of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service. This review is meant to determine and provide: (i) the appropriate pay levels and pay relationships among the offices and positions covered by the review, and (ii) the appropriate pay relationships between those offices and positions and the offices and positions covered by chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5 — the classification and General Schedule pay system. When reviewing the pay of the offices and positions in subparagraph (D), the Commission must also determine and consider whether the executive levels currently assigned to those offices and positions are still appropriate.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Commission shall conduct, in each of the respective fiscal years referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 352(8) of this title, a review of the rates of pay of—

(A)

the Vice President of the United States, Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President pro tempore of the Senate, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House of Representatives;

(B)

offices and positions in the legislative branch referred to in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 203 of the Federal Legislative Salary Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 415; Public Law 88–426);

(C)

justices, judges, and other personnel in the judicial branch referred to in section 403 of the Federal Judicial Salary Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 434; Public Law 88–426) except bankruptcy judges, but including the judges of the United States Court of Federal Claims;

(D)

offices and positions under the Executive Schedule in subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5; and

(E)

the Governors of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service appointed under section 202 of title 39.

Such review by the Commission shall be made for the purpose of determining and providing—

(i)

the appropriate pay levels and relationships between and among the respective offices and positions covered by such review, and

(ii)

the appropriate pay relationships between such offices and positions and the offices and positions subject to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.

In reviewing the rates of pay of the offices or positions referred to in subparagraph (D) of this section, the Commission shall determine and consider the appropriateness of the executive levels of such offices and positions.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–206, title II, § 225(f), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 643; Pub. L. 91–375, § 6(a), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 94–82, title II, § 206(a), Aug. 9, 1975, 89 Stat. 423; Pub. L. 95–598, title III, § 301, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2673; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 143, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 45; Pub. L. 99–190, § 135(b), Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1322; Pub. L. 100–202, § 101(a) [title IV, § 408(c)], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329, 1329–27; Pub. L. 101–194, title VII, § 701(d), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1764; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1967Enacted · Pub. L. 90-206 · 81 Stat. 643
  • 1970Amended · Pub. L. 91-375 · 84 Stat. 775
  • 1975Amended · Pub. L. 94-82 · 89 Stat. 423
  • 1978Amended · Pub. L. 95-598 · 92 Stat. 2673
  • 1982Amended · Pub. L. 97-164 · 96 Stat. 45
  • 1985Amended · Pub. L. 99-190 · 99 Stat. 1322
  • 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-202 · 101 Stat. 1329, 1329
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-194 · 103 Stat. 1764
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-572 · 106 Stat. 4516

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-206 on 1967-12-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case