20 U.S.C. § 1414 — Evaluations, eligibility determinations, individualized education programs, and educational placements
submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 91-230 to r/title-20-EDUCATION · 5,453 words · no verdicts yet
This section sets rules for evaluating children for disabilities, deciding their educational needs, and creating and reviewing individualized education programs (IEPs). It also sets rules for educational placement, children who transfer schools, transition planning, and participation in IEP meetings.
(a) Evaluations, parental consent, and reevaluations
(1) Initial evaluations
(A) In general. Before a child with a disability* first receives special education* and related services* under this subchapter, a State educational agency*, another State* agency, or a local educational agency* must give the child a full and individual initial evaluation under this paragraph and subsection (b).
(B) Request for initial evaluation. Subject to (D), a parent*, a State educational agency, another State agency, or a local educational agency may ask for an initial evaluation to decide whether the child is a child with a disability.
(C) Procedures. (i) The evaluation must use procedures to decide, within 60 days after parental consent, or within a different period set by the State, whether the child is a child with a disability as defined in section 1401, and to decide the child’s educational needs. (ii) That time limit does not apply to a local educational agency if (I) the child enrolls in its school after the period has started but before the previous agency decides whether the child has a disability, and the new agency is making enough progress to finish promptly and the parent and new agency agree on a specific completion date; or (II) the parent repeatedly fails or refuses to bring the child for evaluation.
(D) Parental consent. (i)(I) The agency proposing an initial evaluation must obtain the parent’s informed consent first. Consent to an evaluation is not consent to placing the child to receive services. (II) An agency responsible for making a free appropriate public education* available must seek the parent’s informed consent before providing special education and related services. (ii)(I) If a parent does not consent to an initial evaluation or does not answer the request, the local agency may pursue the evaluation through section 1415 procedures, unless State consent law prevents that. (II) If the parent refuses consent to services, the local agency may not provide the services by using section 1415 procedures. (III) If the parent refuses or does not answer, the local agency is not considered to violate its duty to make a free appropriate public education available by not providing the services for which consent was requested, and it need not hold an IEP meeting or develop an IEP for those services. (iii)(I) If a child is a ward of the State* and does not live with the parent, the agency must make reasonable efforts to obtain the parent’s informed consent for an initial evaluation. (II) Consent is not required if, despite reasonable efforts, the parent’s location cannot be found; the parent’s rights have ended under State law; or a judge has transferred the parent’s educational-decision rights under State law and a judge-appointed representative has consented.
(E) Rule of construction. A teacher’s or specialist’s screening of a student to choose instructional strategies is not an eligibility evaluation for special education and related services.
(2) Reevaluations
(A) A local educational agency must ensure that a reevaluation is conducted under (b) and (c) when the agency decides the child’s educational or related-service needs warrant one, including because of improved academic or functional performance, or when the child’s parent or teacher asks for one. (B) A reevaluation may occur no more than once a year unless the parent and agency agree otherwise. It must occur at least once every 3 years unless they agree it is unnecessary.
(b) Evaluation procedures
(1) Notice. The local educational agency must notify the parents, as required by section 1415(b)(3), (b)(4), and (c), about the evaluation procedures it proposes.
(2) Conduct of evaluation. The agency must (A) use several assessment tools and strategies, including parent information, to gather relevant functional, developmental, and academic information for deciding whether the child has a disability and what the IEP should contain, including information needed for participation and progress in the general curriculum or, for a preschool child, appropriate activities; (B) not use one measure or assessment as the only basis for deciding disability or an educational program; and (C) use technically sound instruments that can assess cognitive and behavioral factors as well as physical and developmental factors.
(3) Additional requirements. The agency must ensure that evaluation materials (A) are chosen and administered without racial or cultural discrimination; (B) are given in the language and form most likely to give accurate information about what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally, unless that is not feasible; (C) are used only for valid and reliable purposes; (D) are administered by trained, knowledgeable people; and (E) follow the producer’s instructions. The child must be assessed in every suspected disability area. The agency must provide tools and strategies that directly help determine educational needs. If a child with a disability transfers between districts in the same school year, the prior and new schools must coordinate assessments as needed and as quickly as possible to finish the full evaluation promptly.
(4) Determining eligibility and educational need. After assessments are completed, a team of qualified professionals and the parent must decide, under paragraph (5), whether the child has a disability as defined in section 1401(3) and what educational needs the child has. The parent must receive the evaluation report and the eligibility documentation.
(5) Special eligibility rule. A child may not be found to have a disability when the deciding factor is lack of appropriate reading instruction, including the essential components of reading instruction as defined in section 6368(3) as that section existed on December 9, 2015; lack of math instruction; or limited English proficiency.
(6) Specific learning disabilities. (A) When deciding whether a child has a specific learning disability* as defined in section 1401, the local agency does not have to consider whether there is a severe difference between achievement and intellectual ability in oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading, reading comprehension, mathematical calculation, or mathematical reasoning. (B) The agency may use a process that asks whether the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the procedures in paragraphs (2) and (3).
(c) Additional requirements for evaluations and reevaluations
(1) Review of existing data. For an initial evaluation, when appropriate, and for any reevaluation, the IEP Team and other qualified professionals must (A) review existing data, including parent evaluations and information, current classroom, local, or State assessments and classroom observations, and teacher and related-service-provider observations; and (B), using that review and parent input, identify any additional data needed to decide (i) whether the child has or continues to have a disability under section 1401(3) and what educational needs the child has; (ii) the child’s current academic achievement and related developmental needs; (iii) whether the child needs or continues to need special education and related services; and (iv) whether additions or changes to those services are needed for the child to meet measurable annual IEP goals and participate as appropriate in the general curriculum.
(2) Source of data. The agency must administer the assessments needed to produce the data identified by the IEP Team.
(3) Parental consent. Before a reevaluation, the agency must obtain informed parental consent under (a)(1)(D), unless it can show that it took reasonable steps to obtain consent and the parent did not respond.
(4) If no additional data are needed. If the IEP Team and other qualified professionals decide no additional data are needed to decide whether the child continues to have a disability and to determine educational needs, the agency must tell the parents that decision and its reasons, and tell them they may request an assessment. The agency need not conduct that assessment unless the parents request it.
(5) Evaluation before ending eligibility. (A) Before deciding that a child no longer has a disability, the agency must evaluate the child under this section. (B)(i) An evaluation is not required before eligibility ends because the child graduates from secondary school* with a regular diploma or exceeds the State’s age eligibility for a free appropriate public education. (ii) In those cases, the agency must give the child a summary of academic achievement and functional performance, including recommendations for helping the child meet postsecondary goals.
(d) Individualized education programs
(1) Definitions
(A) Individualized education program. (i) An “individualized education program” or “IEP” is a written statement for each child with a disability, developed, reviewed, and revised under this section. It must include: (I) the child’s current academic achievement and functional performance, including how the disability affects participation and progress in the general curriculum; for a preschool child, how it affects participation in appropriate activities; and, for a child taking an alternate assessment aligned to alternate achievement standards, benchmarks or short-term objectives. (II) Measurable annual academic and functional goals designed to meet disability-related needs so the child can participate and progress in the general curriculum and to meet the child’s other disability-related educational needs. (III) How progress toward those goals will be measured and when periodic progress reports will be given, such as with quarterly reports or report cards. (IV) The special education, related, supplementary, and other services to be provided, based on peer-reviewed research to the extent practicable, and program changes or supports for school staff, so the child can advance toward the goals, participate and progress in the general curriculum and extracurricular and nonacademic activities, and be educated and participate with children with and without disabilities. (V) An explanation of any extent to which the child will not be in the regular class or activities with children without disabilities. (VI)(aa) Needed individual accommodations for State and districtwide assessments, consistent with section 1412(a)(16)(A). (bb) If the Team chooses an alternate assessment, why the child cannot take the regular assessment and why the chosen alternate assessment is appropriate. (VII) The expected starting date and expected frequency, location, and duration of the services and changes. (VIII), beginning no later than the first IEP effective when the child is 16 and updated each year: (aa) measurable postsecondary goals based on age-appropriate transition assessments concerning training, education, employment, and, when appropriate, independent living; (bb) transition services*, including courses of study, needed to reach those goals; and (cc), beginning no later than 1 year before the child reaches adulthood under State law, a statement that the child was told about any rights under this chapter that will transfer to the child at adulthood under section 1415(m). (ii) This section does not require extra IEP information beyond what it expressly requires, or require the Team to repeat information already included in another IEP component.
(B) IEP Team. The Team consists of the child’s parents; at least one regular-education teacher if the child participates or may participate in regular education; at least one special-education teacher or, when appropriate, special-education provider; a local-agency representative qualified to provide or supervise specially designed instruction, knowledgeable about the general curriculum, and knowledgeable about agency resources; a person who can interpret the instructional meaning of evaluation results, who may also be one of the listed members; other people with knowledge or special expertise about the child, including related-service staff, if the parent or agency invites them; and, when appropriate, the child.
(C) Attendance. (i) A Team member need not attend all or part of a meeting if the parent and agency agree in writing that the member is unnecessary because the member’s curriculum or related-service area will not be changed or discussed. (ii) A member whose area will be changed or discussed may be excused if the parent and agency consent in writing and the member gives the parent and Team written input before the meeting. (iii) The agreement or consent must be in writing.
(D) Transition to an IEP. For a child previously served under subchapter III, the parent may ask that the subchapter III service coordinator or another representative be invited to the initial IEP meeting to help services transition smoothly.
(2) Program in effect. (A) At the start of each school year, each local or State educational agency, or other State agency, must have an IEP in effect for each child with a disability in its jurisdiction. (B) For a child age 3 through 5, or a 2-year-old who will turn 3 during the school year if the State allows it, the Team must consider the individualized family service plan* described in section 1436. That plan may serve as the IEP if State policy allows and the agency and parents agree. (C)(i)(I) When a child with a disability transfers districts in the same school year and enrolls in a new school in the same State, the new agency must provide a free appropriate public education and comparable services, in consultation with the parents, until it adopts the old IEP or develops, adopts, and implements a new one consistent with Federal and State law. (II) If the transfer is from another State, the new agency must provide the same kind of education and comparable services until it evaluates the child under (a)(1), if it decides an evaluation is needed, and develops an appropriate new IEP consistent with Federal and State law. (ii) The new school must reasonably and promptly seek the child’s records, including the IEP and supporting and service records, under 34 C.F.R. 99.31(a)(2), and the prior school must reasonably and promptly respond.
(3) Developing an IEP. (A) The Team must consider the child’s strengths, the parents’ concerns about improving the child’s education, initial or most recent evaluation results, and the child’s academic, developmental, and functional needs. (B) The Team must consider positive behavioral supports and other strategies when behavior interferes with learning; language needs related to the IEP for a child with limited English proficiency; Braille instruction and use for a blind or visually impaired child unless evaluation shows it is inappropriate; communication needs, and for a deaf or hard-of-hearing child language, communication mode, direct communication with peers and staff, academic level, full needs, and direct instruction opportunities; and whether assistive-technology devices or services are needed. (C) To the appropriate extent, the regular-education teacher must help develop the IEP, including behavior supports, supplementary aids and services*, program changes, and staff support. (D) After the annual meeting, the parent and agency may agree in writing to change the IEP without another meeting by creating a written amendment. (E) The agency should, when possible, combine reevaluation and other IEP meetings. (F) The whole Team may change the IEP, or it may be amended as allowed by (D), instead of rewriting the entire document. On request, the parent must receive a revised copy with amendments included.
(4) Review and revision. (A) Subject to (B), the Team must review the IEP periodically, at least annually, to decide whether annual goals are being met, and revise it as appropriate for lack of expected progress toward goals or in the general curriculum, reevaluation results, information from or provided by the parents under (c)(1)(B), anticipated needs, or other matters. (B) The regular-education teacher must participate in review and revision consistent with paragraph (1)(C).
(5) Multi-year IEP demonstration. (A)(i) The purpose is to let States offer parents and agencies optional comprehensive IEPs lasting no more than 3 years and timed to the child’s natural transitions. (ii) The Secretary* may approve no more than 15 State proposals. (iii) A State must submit a proposal as reasonably required. It must assure that multi-year IEPs are optional and require informed parent consent; list required elements, including measurable disability-related goals tied to natural transitions and measurable annual goals for progress; and describe review and revision. The process must include Team review at each natural transition; annual review in other years of current progress and goal achievement, with amendments when needed; a more thorough paragraph (4) review within 30 calendar days if progress is insufficient; and a review at the parent’s request instead of or after an annual review. (B) Beginning 2 years after December 3, 2004, the Secretary must annually report to the House Education and Workforce Committee and Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on program effectiveness and recommendations for wider use, including reducing paperwork and teachers’ noninstructional compliance time, improving long-term planning and outcomes, promoting Team collaboration, and ensuring family satisfaction. (C) “Natural transition points” are periods near a child’s move from preschool to elementary school*, elementary to middle or junior high school, middle or junior high to secondary school, and secondary school to postsecondary activities; no period may be longer than 3 years.
(6) Failure to meet transition objectives. If a participating agency other than the local agency does not provide the IEP’s transition services under (1)(A)(i)(VIII), the local agency must reconvene the Team to identify other strategies for meeting the child’s transition objectives.
(7) Children with disabilities in adult prisons. (A) For children convicted as adults under State law and held in adult prisons, the general-assessment requirements in section 1412(a)(16) and paragraph (1)(A)(i)(VI) do not apply. The transition-planning and transition-service requirements in (1)(A)(i)(VIII)(aa) and (bb) do not apply when the child’s eligibility will end because of age before release. (B) If such a child is in an adult prison, the Team may change the IEP or placement despite section 1412(a)(5)(A) and paragraph (1)(A) if the State has shown a genuine security or compelling prison-management interest that cannot otherwise be accommodated.
(e) Educational placements. The local or State educational agency must ensure that the parents are members of every group that decides the child’s educational placement.
(f) Alternative meeting participation. For IEP and placement meetings under this section and section 1415, and for administrative matters under section 1415 such as scheduling, exchanging witness lists, and status conferences, the parent and local educational agency may agree to participate by alternatives such as videoconferences or conference calls.
A State educational agency*, other State* agency, or local educational agency* shall conduct a full and individual initial evaluation in accordance with this paragraph and subsection (b), before the initial provision of special education* and related services* to a child with a disability* under this subchapter.
Consistent with subparagraph (D), either a parent* of a child, or a State educational agency, other State agency, or local educational agency may initiate a request for an initial evaluation to determine if the child is a child with a disability.
Such initial evaluation shall consist of procedures—
to determine whether a child is a child with a disability (as defined in 1401 of this title) within 60 days of receiving parental consent for the evaluation, or, if the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within such timeframe; and
to determine the educational needs of such child.
The relevant timeframe in clause (i)(I) shall not apply to a local educational agency if—
a child enrolls in a school served by the local educational agency after the relevant timeframe in clause (i)(I) has begun and prior to a determination by the child’s previous local educational agency as to whether the child is a child with a disability (as defined in section 1401 of this title), but only if the subsequent local educational agency is making sufficient progress to ensure a prompt completion of the evaluation, and the parent and subsequent local educational agency agree to a specific time when the evaluation will be completed; or
the parent of a child repeatedly fails or refuses to produce the child for the evaluation.
The agency proposing to conduct an initial evaluation to determine if the child qualifies as a child with a disability as defined in section 1401 of this title shall obtain informed consent from the parent of such child before conducting the evaluation. Parental consent for evaluation shall not be construed as consent for placement for receipt of special education and related services.
An agency that is responsible for making a free appropriate public education* available to a child with a disability under this subchapter shall seek to obtain informed consent from the parent of such child before providing special education and related services to the child.
If the parent of such child does not provide consent for an initial evaluation under clause (i)(I), or the parent fails to respond to a request to provide the consent, the local educational agency may pursue the initial evaluation of the child by utilizing the procedures described in section 1415 of this title, except to the extent inconsistent with State law relating to such parental consent.
If the parent of such child refuses to consent to services under clause (i)(II), the local educational agency shall not provide special education and related services to the child by utilizing the procedures described in section 1415 of this title.
If the parent of such child refuses to consent to the receipt of special education and related services, or the parent fails to respond to a request to provide such consent—
the local educational agency shall not be considered to be in violation of the requirement to make available a free appropriate public education to the child for the failure to provide such child with the special education and related services for which the local educational agency requests such consent; and
the local educational agency shall not be required to convene an IEP meeting or develop an IEP under this section for the child for the special education and related services for which the local educational agency requests such consent.
If the child is a ward of the State* and is not residing with the child’s parent, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent (as defined in section 1401 of this title) of the child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability.
The agency shall not be required to obtain informed consent from the parent of a child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability if—
despite reasonable efforts to do so, the agency cannot discover the whereabouts of the parent of the child;
the rights of the parents of the child have been terminated in accordance with State law; or
the rights of the parent to make educational decisions have been subrogated by a judge in accordance with State law and consent for an initial evaluation has been given by an individual appointed by the judge to represent the child.
The screening of a student by a teacher or specialist to determine appropriate instructional strategies for curriculum implementation shall not be considered to be an evaluation for eligibility for special education and related services.
A local educational agency shall ensure that a reevaluation of each child with a disability is conducted in accordance with subsections (b) and (c)—
if the local educational agency determines that the educational or related services needs, including improved academic achievement and functional performance, of the child warrant a reevaluation; or
if the child’s parents or teacher requests a reevaluation.
A reevaluation conducted under subparagraph (A) shall occur—
not more frequently than once a year, unless the parent and the local educational agency agree otherwise; and
at least once every 3 years, unless the parent and the local educational agency agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary.
The local educational agency shall provide notice to the parents of a child with a disability, in accordance with subsections (b)(3), (b)(4), and (c) of section 1415 of this title, that describes any evaluation procedures such agency proposes to conduct.
In conducting the evaluation, the local educational agency shall—
use a variety of assessment tools and strategies to gather relevant functional, developmental, and academic information, including information provided by the parent, that may assist in determining—
whether the child is a child with a disability; and
the content of the child’s individualized education program, including information related to enabling the child to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum, or, for preschool children, to participate in appropriate activities;
not use any single measure or assessment as the sole criterion for determining whether a child is a child with a disability or determining an appropriate educational program for the child; and
use technically sound instruments that may assess the relative contribution of cognitive and behavioral factors, in addition to physical or developmental factors.
Each local educational agency shall ensure that—
assessments and other evaluation materials used to assess a child under this section—
are selected and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial or cultural basis;
are provided and administered in the language and form most likely to yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally, unless it is not feasible to so provide or administer;
are used for purposes for which the assessments or measures are valid and reliable;
are administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel; and
are administered in accordance with any instructions provided by the producer of such assessments;
the child is assessed in all areas of suspected disability;
assessment tools and strategies that provide relevant information that directly assists persons in determining the educational needs of the child are provided; and
assessments of children with disabilities who transfer from 1 school district to another school district in the same academic year are coordinated with such children’s prior and subsequent schools, as necessary and as expeditiously as possible, to ensure prompt completion of full evaluations.
Upon completion of the administration of assessments and other evaluation measures—
the determination of whether the child is a child with a disability as defined in section 1401(3) of this title and the educational needs of the child shall be made by a team of qualified professionals and the parent of the child in accordance with paragraph (5); and
a copy of the evaluation report and the documentation of determination of eligibility shall be given to the parent.
In making a determination of eligibility under paragraph (4)(A), a child shall not be determined to be a child with a disability if the determinant factor for such determination is—
lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including in the essential components of reading instruction (as defined in section 6368(3) of this title, as such section was in effect on the day before December 10, 2015);
lack of instruction in math; or
limited English proficiency.
Notwithstanding section 1406(b) of this title, when determining whether a child has a specific learning disability* as defined in section 1401 of this title, a local educational agency shall not be required to take into consideration whether a child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability in oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading skill, reading comprehension, mathematical calculation, or mathematical reasoning.
In determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, a local educational agency may use a process that determines if the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention as a part of the evaluation procedures described in paragraphs (2) and (3).
As part of an initial evaluation (if appropriate) and as part of any reevaluation under this section, the IEP Team and other qualified professionals, as appropriate, shall—
review existing evaluation data on the child, including—
evaluations and information provided by the parents of the child;
current classroom-based, local, or State assessments, and classroom-based observations; and
observations by teachers and related services providers; and
on the basis of that review, and input from the child’s parents, identify what additional data, if any, are needed to determine—
whether the child is a child with a disability as defined in section 1401(3) of this title, and the educational needs of the child, or, in case of a reevaluation of a child, whether the child continues to have such a disability and such educational needs;
the present levels of academic achievement and related developmental needs of the child;
whether the child needs special education and related services, or in the case of a reevaluation of a child, whether the child continues to need special education and related services; and
whether any additions or modifications to the special education and related services are needed to enable the child to meet the measurable annual goals set out in the individualized education program of the child and to participate, as appropriate, in the general education curriculum.
The local educational agency shall administer such assessments and other evaluation measures as may be needed to produce the data identified by the IEP Team under paragraph (1)(B).
Each local educational agency shall obtain informed parental consent, in accordance with subsection (a)(1)(D), prior to conducting any reevaluation of a child with a disability, except that such informed parental consent need not be obtained if the local educational agency can demonstrate that it had taken reasonable measures to obtain such consent and the child’s parent has failed to respond.
If the IEP Team and other qualified professionals, as appropriate, determine that no additional data are needed to determine whether the child continues to be a child with a disability and to determine the child’s educational needs, the local educational agency—
shall notify the child’s parents of—
that determination and the reasons for the determination; and
the right of such parents to request an assessment to determine whether the child continues to be a child with a disability and to determine the child’s educational needs; and
shall not be required to conduct such an assessment unless requested to by the child’s parents.
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a local educational agency shall evaluate a child with a disability in accordance with this section before determining that the child is no longer a child with a disability.
The evaluation described in subparagraph (A) shall not be required before the termination of a child’s eligibility under this subchapter due to graduation from secondary school* with a regular diploma, or due to exceeding the age eligibility for a free appropriate public education under State law.
For a child whose eligibility under this subchapter terminates under circumstances described in clause (i), a local educational agency shall provide the child with a summary of the child’s academic achievement and functional performance, which shall include recommendations on how to assist the child in meeting the child’s postsecondary goals.
In this chapter:
The term “individualized education program” or “IEP” means a written statement for each child with a disability that is developed, reviewed, and revised in accordance with this section and that includes—
a statement of the child’s present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, including—
how the child’s disability affects the child’s involvement and progress in the general education curriculum;
for preschool children, as appropriate, how the disability affects the child’s participation in appropriate activities; and
for children with disabilities who take alternate assessments aligned to alternate achievement standards, a description of benchmarks or short-term objectives;
a statement of measurable annual goals, including academic and functional goals, designed to—
meet the child’s needs that result from the child’s disability to enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum; and
meet each of the child’s other educational needs that result from the child’s disability;
a description of how the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals described in subclause (II) will be measured and when periodic reports on the progress the child is making toward meeting the annual goals (such as through the use of quarterly or other periodic reports, concurrent with the issuance of report cards) will be provided;
a statement of the special education and related services and supplementary aids and services*, based on peer-reviewed research to the extent practicable, to be provided to the child, or on behalf of the child, and a statement of the program modifications or supports for school personnel that will be provided for the child—
to advance appropriately toward attaining the annual goals;
to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum in accordance with subclause (I) and to participate in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities; and
to be educated and participate with other children with disabilities and nondisabled children in the activities described in this subparagraph;
an explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in the regular class and in the activities described in subclause (IV)(cc);
a statement of any individual appropriate accommodations that are necessary to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on State and districtwide assessments consistent with section 1412(a)(16)(A) of this title; and
if the IEP Team determines that the child shall take an alternate assessment on a particular State or districtwide assessment of student achievement, a statement of why—
the child cannot participate in the regular assessment; and
the particular alternate assessment selected is appropriate for the child;
the projected date for the beginning of the services and modifications described in subclause (IV), and the anticipated frequency, location, and duration of those services and modifications; and
beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child is 16, and updated annually thereafter—
appropriate measurable postsecondary goals based upon age appropriate transition assessments related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate, independent living skills;
the transition services* (including courses of study) needed to assist the child in reaching those goals; and
beginning not later than 1 year before the child reaches the age of majority under State law, a statement that the child has been informed of the child’s rights under this chapter, if any, that will transfer to the child on reaching the age of majority under section 1415(m) of this title.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to require—
that additional information be included in a child’s IEP beyond what is explicitly required in this section; and
the IEP Team to include information under 1 component of a child’s IEP that is already contained under another component of such IEP.
The term “individualized education program team” or “IEP Team” means a group of individuals composed of—
the parents of a child with a disability;
not less than 1 regular education teacher of such child (if the child is, or may be, participating in the regular education environment);
not less than 1 special education teacher, or where appropriate, not less than 1 special education provider of such child;
a representative of the local educational agency who—
is qualified to provide, or supervise the provision of, specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of children with disabilities;
is knowledgeable about the general education curriculum; and
is knowledgeable about the availability of resources of the local educational agency;
an individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results, who may be a member of the team described in clauses (ii) through (vi);
at the discretion of the parent or the agency, other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child, including related services personnel as appropriate; and
whenever appropriate, the child with a disability.
A member of the IEP Team shall not be required to attend an IEP meeting, in whole or in part, if the parent of a child with a disability and the local educational agency agree that the attendance of such member is not necessary because the member’s area of the curriculum or related services is not being modified or discussed in the meeting.
A member of the IEP Team may be excused from attending an IEP meeting, in whole or in part, when the meeting involves a modification to or discussion of the member’s area of the curriculum or related services, if—
the parent and the local educational agency consent to the excusal; and
the member submits, in writing to the parent and the IEP Team, input into the development of the IEP prior to the meeting.
A parent’s agreement under clause (i) and consent under clause (ii) shall be in writing.
In the case of a child who was previously served under subchapter III, an invitation to the initial IEP meeting shall, at the request of the parent, be sent to the subchapter III service coordinator or other representatives of the subchapter III system to assist with the smooth transition of services.
At the beginning of each school year, each local educational agency, State educational agency, or other State agency, as the case may be, shall have in effect, for each child with a disability in the agency’s jurisdiction, an individualized education program, as defined in paragraph (1)(A).
In the case of a child with a disability aged 3 through 5 (or, at the discretion of the State educational agency, a 2-year-old child with a disability who will turn age 3 during the school year), the IEP Team shall consider the individualized family service plan* that contains the material described in section 1436 of this title, and that is developed in accordance with this section, and the individualized family service plan may serve as the IEP of the child if using that plan as the IEP is—
consistent with State policy; and
agreed to by the agency and the child’s parents.
In the case of a child with a disability who transfers school districts within the same academic year, who enrolls in a new school, and who had an IEP that was in effect in the same State, the local educational agency shall provide such child with a free appropriate public education, including services comparable to those described in the previously held IEP, in consultation with the parents until such time as the local educational agency adopts the previously held IEP or develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP that is consistent with Federal and State law.
In the case of a child with a disability who transfers school districts within the same academic year, who enrolls in a new school, and who had an IEP that was in effect in another State, the local educational agency shall provide such child with a free appropriate public education, including services comparable to those described in the previously held IEP, in consultation with the parents until such time as the local educational agency conducts an evaluation pursuant to subsection (a)(1), if determined to be necessary by such agency, and develops a new IEP, if appropriate, that is consistent with Federal and State law.
To facilitate the transition for a child described in clause (i)—
the new school in which the child enrolls shall take reasonable steps to promptly obtain the child’s records, including the IEP and supporting documents and any other records relating to the provision of special education or related services to the child, from the previous school in which the child was enrolled, pursuant to section 99.31(a)(2) of title 34, Code of Federal Regulations; and
the previous school in which the child was enrolled shall take reasonable steps to promptly respond to such request from the new school.
In developing each child’s IEP, the IEP Team, subject to subparagraph (C), shall consider—
the strengths of the child;
the concerns of the parents for enhancing the education of their child;
the results of the initial evaluation or most recent evaluation of the child; and
the academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child.
The IEP Team shall—
in the case of a child whose behavior impedes the child’s learning or that of others, consider the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and other strategies, to address that behavior;
in the case of a child with limited English proficiency, consider the language needs of the child as such needs relate to the child’s IEP;
in the case of a child who is blind or visually impaired, provide for instruction in Braille and the use of Braille unless the IEP Team determines, after an evaluation of the child’s reading and writing skills, needs, and appropriate reading and writing media (including an evaluation of the child’s future needs for instruction in Braille or the use of Braille), that instruction in Braille or the use of Braille is not appropriate for the child;
consider the communication needs of the child, and in the case of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing, consider the child’s language and communication needs, opportunities for direct communications with peers and professional personnel in the child’s language and communication mode, academic level, and full range of needs, including opportunities for direct instruction in the child’s language and communication mode; and
consider whether the child needs assistive technology devices and services.
A regular education teacher of the child, as a member of the IEP Team, shall, to the extent appropriate, participate in the development of the IEP of the child, including the determination of appropriate positive behavioral interventions and supports, and other strategies, and the determination of supplementary aids and services, program modifications, and support for school personnel consistent with paragraph (1)(A)(i)(IV).
In making changes to a child’s IEP after the annual IEP meeting for a school year, the parent of a child with a disability and the local educational agency may agree not to convene an IEP meeting for the purposes of making such changes, and instead may develop a written document to amend or modify the child’s current IEP.
To the extent possible, the local educational agency shall encourage the consolidation of reevaluation meetings for the child and other IEP Team meetings for the child.
Changes to the IEP may be made either by the entire IEP Team or, as provided in subparagraph (D), by amending the IEP rather than by redrafting the entire IEP. Upon request, a parent shall be provided with a revised copy of the IEP with the amendments incorporated.
The local educational agency shall ensure that, subject to subparagraph (B), the IEP Team—
reviews the child’s IEP periodically, but not less frequently than annually, to determine whether the annual goals for the child are being achieved; and
revises the IEP as appropriate to address—
any lack of expected progress toward the annual goals and in the general education curriculum, where appropriate;
the results of any reevaluation conducted under this section;
information about the child provided to, or by, the parents, as described in subsection (c)(1)(B);
the child’s anticipated needs; or
other matters.
A regular education teacher of the child, as a member of the IEP Team, shall, consistent with paragraph (1)(C), participate in the review and revision of the IEP of the child.
The purpose of this paragraph is to provide an opportunity for States to allow parents and local educational agencies the opportunity for long-term planning by offering the option of developing a comprehensive multi-year IEP, not to exceed 3 years, that is designed to coincide with the natural transition points for the child.
In order to carry out the purpose of this paragraph, the Secretary* is authorized to approve not more than 15 proposals from States to carry out the activity described in clause (i).
A State desiring to participate in the program under this paragraph shall submit a proposal to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may reasonably require.
The proposal shall include—
assurances that the development of a multi-year IEP under this paragraph is optional for parents;
assurances that the parent is required to provide informed consent before a comprehensive multi-year IEP is developed;
a list of required elements for each multi-year IEP, including—
measurable goals pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(i)(II), coinciding with natural transition points for the child, that will enable the child to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum and that will meet the child’s other needs that result from the child’s disability; and
measurable annual goals for determining progress toward meeting the goals described in subitem (AA); and
a description of the process for the review and revision of each multi-year IEP, including—
a review by the IEP Team of the child’s multi-year IEP at each of the child’s natural transition points;
in years other than a child’s natural transition points, an annual review of the child’s IEP to determine the child’s current levels of progress and whether the annual goals for the child are being achieved, and a requirement to amend the IEP, as appropriate, to enable the child to continue to meet the measurable goals set out in the IEP;
if the IEP Team determines on the basis of a review that the child is not making sufficient progress toward the goals described in the multi-year IEP, a requirement that the local educational agency shall ensure that the IEP Team carries out a more thorough review of the IEP in accordance with paragraph (4) within 30 calendar days; and
at the request of the parent, a requirement that the IEP Team shall conduct a review of the child’s multi-year IEP rather than or subsequent to an annual review.
Beginning 2 years after December 3, 2004, the Secretary shall submit an annual report to the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate regarding the effectiveness of the program under this paragraph and any specific recommendations for broader implementation of such program, including—
reducing—
the paperwork burden on teachers, principals, administrators, and related service providers; and
noninstructional time spent by teachers in complying with this subchapter;
enhancing longer-term educational planning;
improving positive outcomes for children with disabilities;
promoting collaboration between IEP Team members; and
ensuring satisfaction of family members.
In this paragraph, the term “natural transition points” means those periods that are close in time to the transition of a child with a disability from preschool to elementary grades, from elementary grades to middle or junior high school grades, from middle or junior high school grades to secondary school grades, and from secondary school grades to post-secondary activities, but in no case a period longer than 3 years.
If a participating agency, other than the local educational agency, fails to provide the transition services described in the IEP in accordance with paragraph (1)(A)(i)(VIII), the local educational agency shall reconvene the IEP Team to identify alternative strategies to meet the transition objectives for the child set out in the IEP.
The following requirements shall not apply to children with disabilities who are convicted as adults under State law and incarcerated in adult prisons:
The requirements contained in section 1412(a)(16) of this title and paragraph (1)(A)(i)(VI) (relating to participation of children with disabilities in general assessments).
The requirements of items (aa) and (bb) of paragraph (1)(A)(i)(VIII) (relating to transition planning and transition services), do not apply with respect to such children whose eligibility under this subchapter will end, because of such children’s age, before such children will be released from prison.
If a child with a disability is convicted as an adult under State law and incarcerated in an adult prison, the child’s IEP Team may modify the child’s IEP or placement notwithstanding the requirements of sections 1 1412(a)(5)(A) of this title and paragraph (1)(A) if the State has demonstrated a bona fide security or compelling penological interest that cannot otherwise be accommodated.
Each local educational agency or State educational agency shall ensure that the parents of each child with a disability are members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement of their child.
When conducting IEP team 2 meetings and placement meetings pursuant to this section, section 1415(e) of this title, and section 1415(f)(1)(B) of this title, and carrying out administrative matters under section 1415 of this title (such as scheduling, exchange of witness lists, and status conferences), the parent of a child with a disability and a local educational agency may agree to use alternative means of meeting participation, such as video conferences and conference calls.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 91–230, title VI, § 614, as added Pub. L. 108–446, title I, § 101, Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2702; amended Pub. L. 114–95, title IX, § 9215(ss)(5), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2182.)
- 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 91-230 · 118 Stat. 2702
- 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-95 · 129 Stat. 2182
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 91-230 on 2004-12-03.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case