ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 360ccProtection for drugs for rare diseases or conditions

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 97-414 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 771 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law gives a 7-year period of exclusive market rights to a drug approved for a rare disease. During that time, the FDA usually can't approve another maker's version of the drug for that use. Exceptions apply if the maker can't supply enough, consents, or fails to prove clinical superiority.

(a) Exclusive approval, certification, or license. Except as subsection (b) allows, if the Secretary approves a drug application under section 355 of this title, or issues a biologics license under section 262 of title 42, for a drug designated under section 360bb of this title as treating a rare disease or condition, the Secretary may not approve or license another maker's version of that same drug for that same approved use within that rare disease, for a person who does not hold the original approval or license, until 7 years after the original approval or license. The usual right to a hearing on a refusal to approve under section 355(c)(2) of this title does not apply to a refusal made under this rule. (b) Exceptions. During that 7-year period, the Secretary may approve or license a drug that is otherwise the same as the already-approved drug, for the same use, if — (1) after giving the exclusivity holder notice and a chance to respond, the Secretary finds the holder cannot ensure enough of the drug is available to meet the needs of people with the disease or condition, or (2) the holder gives the Secretary written consent to approve or license others before the 7 years end. (c) Condition of clinical superiority (1) In general. If a sponsor's drug is designated under section 360bb of this title and is otherwise the same as an already-approved or licensed drug, and the sponsor is seeking exclusive approval or licensure under subsection (a) for the same use for which the already-approved drug was approved, the Secretary must require the sponsor, as a condition of that exclusivity, to show the new drug is "clinically superior" to the already-approved drug. (2) Definition. "Clinically superior" means the drug provides a significant therapeutic advantage over the already-approved or licensed drug — through greater effectiveness, greater safety, or a major contribution to patient care. (3) Applicability. This clinical-superiority requirement applies to any drug designated under section 360bb of this title for which an application was approved under section 355 of this title, or a license issued under section 262 of title 42, after August 18, 2017 — regardless of when the drug was originally designated. (d) Regulations. The Secretary may issue regulations to carry out subsection (c). Until new regulations are issued, beginning August 18, 2017, the Secretary may apply definitions from regulations that existed before that date, as long as they do not conflict with this section as amended. (e) Demonstration of clinical superiority standard. To help sponsors show clinical superiority, the Secretary must — (1) upon designating a drug under section 360bb of this title, notify the sponsor in writing of the basis for the designation, including any plausible theory the sponsor offered, and the Secretary relied on, that the drug is clinically superior to a previously approved drug; and (2) upon granting exclusive approval or licensure under subsection (a) based on a demonstration of clinical superiority, publish a summary of the clinical superiority findings. (f) Approved use or indication defined. In this section, "approved use or indication" means the use or indication approved under section 355 of this title, or licensed under section 262 of title 42, for a drug designated under section 360bb of this title as treating a rare disease or condition.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Exclusive approval, certification, or license

Except as provided in subsection (b), if the Secretary

(1)

approves an application filed pursuant to section 355 of this title, or

(2)

issues a license under section 262 of title 42

for a drug designated under section 360bb of this title for a rare disease or condition, the Secretary may not approve another application under section 355 of this title or issue another license under section 262 of title 42 for the same drug for the same approved use or indication within such rare disease or condition for a person who is not the holder of such approved application or of such license until the expiration of seven years from the date of the approval of the approved application or the issuance of the license. Section 355(c)(2) 1 of this title does not apply to the refusal to approve an application under the preceding sentence.

(b) Exceptions

During the 7-year period described in subsection (a) for an approved application under section 355 of this title or license under section 262 of title 42, the Secretary may approve an application or issue a license for a drug that is otherwise the same, as determined by the Secretary, as the already approved drug for the same approved use or indication for which such 7-year period applies to such already approved or licensed drug if—

(1)

the Secretary finds, after providing the holder of exclusive approval or licensure notice and opportunity for the submission of views, that during such period the holder of the exclusive approval or licensure cannot ensure the availability of sufficient quantities of the drug to meet the needs, relating to the approved use or indication, of persons with the disease or condition for which the drug was designated; or

(2)

the holder provides the Secretary in writing the consent of such holder for the approval of other applications or the issuance of other licenses before the expiration of such seven-year period.

(c) Condition of clinical superiority
(1) In general

If a sponsor of a drug that is designated under section 360bb of this title and is otherwise the same, as determined by the Secretary, as an already approved or licensed drug is seeking exclusive approval or exclusive licensure described in subsection (a) for the same use or indication for which the already approved or licensed drug was approved or licensed, the Secretary shall require such sponsor, as a condition of such exclusive approval or licensure, to demonstrate that such drug is clinically superior to any already approved or licensed drug that is the same drug.

(2) Definition

For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “clinically superior” with respect to a drug means that the drug provides a significant therapeutic advantage over and above an already approved or licensed drug in terms of greater efficacy, greater safety, or by providing a major contribution to patient care.

(3) Applicability

This subsection applies to any drug designated under section 360bb of this title for which an application was approved under section 355 of this title or licensed under section 262 of title 42 after August 18, 2017, regardless of the date on which such drug was designated under section 360bb of this title.

(d) Regulations

The Secretary may promulgate regulations for the implementation of subsection (c). Beginning on August 18, 2017, until such time as the Secretary promulgates regulations in accordance with this subsection, the Secretary may apply any definitions set forth in regulations that were promulgated prior to such date, to the extent such definitions are not inconsistent with the terms of this section, as amended by such Act.

(e) Demonstration of clinical superiority standard

To assist sponsors in demonstrating clinical superiority as described in subsection (c), the Secretary—

(1)

upon the designation of any drug under section 360bb of this title, shall notify the sponsor of such drug in writing of the basis for the designation, including, as applicable, any plausible hypothesis offered by the sponsor and relied upon by the Secretary that the drug is clinically superior to a previously approved drug; and

(2)

upon granting exclusive approval or licensure under subsection (a) on the basis of a demonstration of clinical superiority as described in subsection (c), shall publish a summary of the clinical superiority findings.

(f) Approved use or indication defined

In this section, the term “approved use or indication” means the use or indication approved under section 355 of this title or licensed under section 262 of title 42 for a drug designated under section 360bb of this title for a rare disease or condition.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 527, as added Pub. L. 97–414, § 2(a), Jan. 4, 1983, 96 Stat. 2050; amended Pub. L. 98–417, title I, § 102(b)(6), Sept. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 1593; Pub. L. 99–91, §§ 2, 3(a)(3), Aug. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 387, 388; Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(v), Aug. 13, 1993, 107 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 105–115, title I, § 125(b)(2)(J), (K), Nov. 21, 1997, 111 Stat. 2326; Pub. L. 107–281, § 4, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 1993; Pub. L. 115–52, title VI, § 607(a), Aug. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1049; Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title III, § 323, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2933; Pub. L. 119–75, div. J, title VI, § 6605(a), Feb. 3, 2026, 140 Stat. 701.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 97-414 · 96 Stat. 2050
  • 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-417 · 98 Stat. 1593
  • 1985Amended · Pub. L. 99-91 · 99 Stat. 387, 388
  • 1993Amended · Pub. L. 103-80 · 107 Stat. 778
  • 1997Amended · Pub. L. 105-115 · 111 Stat. 2326
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-281 · 116 Stat. 1993
  • 2017Amended · Pub. L. 115-52 · 131 Stat. 1049
  • 2020Amended · Pub. L. 116-260 · 134 Stat. 2933
  • 2026Amended · Pub. L. 119-75 · 140 Stat. 701

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 97-414 on 1938-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case