ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 364dSafety substantiation

submitted 88 years ago by Pub. L. 117-328 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 241 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A cosmetic's responsible person must have, and keep records proving, adequate proof that the product is safe. Coal-tar hair dye is exempt from this rule but still needs safety records kept. "Safe" means not harmful under normal or labeled use, and minor, temporary reactions do not count as unsafe.

(a) Substantiation of safety: The responsible person for a cosmetic product must make sure there is adequate proof the product is safe, and must keep records supporting that proof. (b) Coal-tar hair dye: Subsection (a) does not apply to coal-tar hair dye that otherwise follows section 361(a)'s rules. But the responsible person for that hair dye must still keep safety-related records. (c) Definitions: (1) "Adequate substantiation of safety" means tests, studies, research, analyses, or other evidence that qualified experts consider enough to reasonably support that a cosmetic product is safe. (2) "Safe" means the cosmetic, including any ingredient, does not hurt users under the conditions listed on its label, or under normal, expected use. The Secretary cannot call a cosmetic or ingredient harmful just because it can cause minor, temporary reactions or skin irritation in some users. When deciding if a product is safe, the Secretary may consider, as appropriate and available, cumulative or other relevant exposure to the product, including its ingredients.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Substantiation of safety

A responsible person for a cosmetic product shall ensure, and maintain records supporting, that there is adequate substantiation of safety of such cosmetic product.

(b) Coal-tar hair dye

Subsection (a) shall not apply to coal-tar hair dye that otherwise complies with the requirements of section 361(a) of this title. A responsible person for a coal-tar hair dye shall maintain records related to the safety of such product.

(c) Definitions

For purposes of this section:

(1) Adequate substantiation of safety

The term “adequate substantiation of safety” means tests or studies, research, analyses, or other evidence or information that is considered, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products and their ingredients, sufficient to support a reasonable certainty that a cosmetic product is safe.

(2) Safe

The term “safe” means that the cosmetic product, including any ingredient thereof, is not injurious to users under the conditions of use prescribed in the labeling thereof, or under such conditions of use as are customary or usual. The Secretary shall not consider a cosmetic ingredient or cosmetic product injurious to users solely because it can cause minor and transient reactions or minor and transient skin irritations in some users. In determining for purposes of this section whether a cosmetic product is safe, the Secretary may consider, as appropriate and available, the cumulative or other relevant exposure to the cosmetic product, including any ingredient thereof.

Source credit: (June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 608, as added Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title III, § 3502, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5854.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1938Enacted · Pub. L. 117-328 · 136 Stat. 5854

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-328 on 1938-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case