ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

21 U.S.C. § 814Removal of exemption of certain drugs

submitted 33 years ago by Pub. L. 91-513 to r/title-21-FOOD-AND-DRUGS · 574 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Attorney General must remove an exemption for a drug or group of drugs found to be diverted for illicit production of a controlled substance. The section sets decision factors and a process for restoring the exemption for a particular product that is made and distributed to prevent diversion.

(a) Removal. By regulation, the Attorney General must remove from the exemption in section 802(39)(A)(iv) a drug or group of drugs that the Attorney General finds is being diverted to obtain a listed chemical for illicit production of a controlled substance. (b) Factors. The Attorney General must consider the diversion's scope, duration, and importance; whether the drug is made so it cannot easily be used for illicit production; and whether the listed chemical can readily be recovered from it. (c) Specificity. The designation must be limited to the most specifically identifiable drug or group for which diversion evidence exists, unless the diversion pattern and other relevant factors show that diversion will not be limited to that drug or group. (d) Restoration for particular products. (1) On a manufacturer's application, the Attorney General must restore the exemption for a particular product removed under subsection (a) if the product is made and distributed in a way that prevents diversion. (2) The Attorney General must consider package size and packaging; distribution and advertising; evidence of diversion; the manufacturer's prevention steps; and other factors relevant to and consistent with public health and safety, including the factors in subsection (b) as applied to the product. (3) A transaction involving a product with a genuine pending restoration application filed within 60 days after the removal regulation is issued is not a regulated transaction while the application is pending and, if denied, for 60 days after denial, unless the Attorney General has evidence the product is being diverted under the subsection (b) factors and notifies the applicant. (4) A restoration regulation may be changed or revoked if those factors show diversion or if the data supporting the regulation has significantly changed.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Removal of exemption

The Attorney General shall by regulation remove from exemption under section 802(39)(A)(iv) of this title a drug or group of drugs that the Attorney General finds is being diverted to obtain a listed chemical for use in the illicit production of a controlled substance.

(b) Factors to be considered

In removing a drug or group of drugs from exemption under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall consider, with respect to a drug or group of drugs that is proposed to be removed from exemption—

(1)

the scope, duration, and significance of the diversion;

(2)

whether the drug or group of drugs is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance; and

(3)

whether the listed chemical can be readily recovered from the drug or group of drugs.

(c) Specificity of designation

The Attorney General shall limit the designation of a drug or a group of drugs removed from exemption under subsection (a) to the most particularly identifiable type of drug or group of drugs for which evidence of diversion exists unless there is evidence, based on the pattern of diversion and other relevant factors, that the diversion will not be limited to that particular drug or group of drugs.

(d) Reinstatement of exemption with respect to particular drug products
(1) Reinstatement

On application by a manufacturer of a particular drug product that has been removed from exemption under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall by regulation reinstate the exemption with respect to that particular drug product if the Attorney General determines that the particular drug product is manufactured and distributed in a manner that prevents diversion.

(2) Factors to be considered

In deciding whether to reinstate the exemption with respect to a particular drug product under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall consider—

(A)

the package sizes and manner of packaging of the drug product;

(B)

the manner of distribution and advertising of the drug product;

(C)

evidence of diversion of the drug product;

(D)

any actions taken by the manufacturer to prevent diversion of the drug product; and

(E)

such other factors as are relevant to and consistent with the public health and safety, including the factors described in subsection (b) as applied to the drug product.

(3) Status pending application for reinstatement

A transaction involving a particular drug product that is the subject of a bona fide pending application for reinstatement of exemption filed with the Attorney General not later than 60 days after a regulation removing the exemption is issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall not be considered to be a regulated transaction if the transaction occurs during the pendency of the application and, if the Attorney General denies the application, during the period of 60 days following the date on which the Attorney General denies the application, unless—

(A)

the Attorney General has evidence that, applying the factors described in subsection (b) to the drug product, the drug product is being diverted; and

(B)

the Attorney General so notifies the applicant.

(4) Amendment and modification

A regulation reinstating an exemption under paragraph (1) may be modified or revoked with respect to a particular drug product upon a finding that—

(A)

applying the factors described in subsection (b) to the drug product, the drug product is being diverted; or

(B)

there is a significant change in the data that led to the issuance of the regulation.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 91–513, title II, § 204, as added Pub. L. 103–200, § 2(b)(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2334; amended Pub. L. 104–237, title IV, § 401(c), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3108; Pub. L. 109–177, title VII, § 712(a)(2), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 263.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1993Enacted · Pub. L. 91-513 · 107 Stat. 2334
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-237 · 110 Stat. 3108
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-177 · 120 Stat. 263

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 91-513 on 1993-12-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case