ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

22 U.S.C. § 9003Judicial remedies

submitted 38 years ago by Pub. L. 100-300 to r/title-22-FOREIGN-RELATIONS-AND-INTERCOURSE · 511 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

State and federal courts share power to hear Hague Convention child abduction cases. A parent seeking a child's return or visitation rights must prove their case. The person opposing return must prove any exception applies.

(a) Jurisdiction of courts. State courts and U.S. district courts share original power to hear cases arising under the Convention. (b) Petitions. Anyone seeking a child's return, or visitation rights, under the Convention can start a case. They file a petition in any court that has jurisdiction and the power to act where the child is located. (c) Notice. Notice of this action must follow the same rules used for interstate child custody notice. (d) Determination of case. The court must decide the case following the Convention. (e) Burdens of proof. (1) The petitioner must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence — meaning it is more likely true than not — that: (A) for a return case, the child was wrongfully removed or kept, as the Convention defines it; and (B) for a visitation case, the petitioner has those rights. (2) A respondent who opposes returning the child must prove: (A) by clear and convincing evidence, that one of the exceptions in Convention Article 13(b) or 20 applies; and (B) by a preponderance of the evidence, that any other exception in Article 12 or 13 applies. (f) Application of Convention. For any case under this chapter: (1) "authorities," as the Convention uses it in Article 15, includes courts and government agencies; (2) "wrongful removal or retention" includes removing or keeping a child before a custody order about that child was made; and (3) "commencement of proceedings," as used in Article 12, means — for a child in the United States — the filing of a petition under subsection (b). (g) Full faith and credit. Courts in every state and federal court must fully honor another court's judgment ordering or denying a child's return under the Convention. (h) Remedies under Convention not exclusive. The remedies in the Convention and this chapter come in addition to remedies available under other laws or international agreements.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Jurisdiction of courts

The courts of the States and the United States district courts shall have concurrent original jurisdiction of actions arising under the Convention.

(b) Petitions

Any person seeking to initiate judicial proceedings under the Convention for the return of a child or for arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access to a child may do so by commencing a civil action by filing a petition for the relief sought in any court which has jurisdiction of such action and which is authorized to exercise its jurisdiction in the place where the child is located at the time the petition is filed.

(c) Notice

Notice of an action brought under subsection (b) shall be given in accordance with the applicable law governing notice in interstate child custody proceedings.

(d) Determination of case

The court in which an action is brought under subsection (b) shall decide the case in accordance with the Convention.

(e) Burdens of proof
(1)

A petitioner in an action brought under subsection (b) shall establish by a preponderance of the evidence—

(A)

in the case of an action for the return of a child, that the child has been wrongfully removed or retained within the meaning of the Convention; and

(B)

in the case of an action for arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access, that the petitioner has such rights.

(2)

In the case of an action for the return of a child, a respondent who opposes the return of the child has the burden of establishing—

(A)

by clear and convincing evidence that one of the exceptions set forth in article 13b or 20 of the Convention applies; and

(B)

by a preponderance of the evidence that any other exception set forth in article 12 or 13 of the Convention applies.

(f) Application of Convention

For purposes of any action brought under this chapter—

(1)

the term “authorities”, as used in article 15 of the Convention to refer to the authorities of the state of the habitual residence of a child, includes courts and appropriate government agencies;

(2)

the terms “wrongful removal or retention” and “wrongfully removed or retained”, as used in the Convention, include a removal or retention of a child before the entry of a custody order regarding that child; and

(3)

the term “commencement of proceedings”, as used in article 12 of the Convention, means, with respect to the return of a child located in the United States, the filing of a petition in accordance with subsection (b) of this section.

(g) Full faith and credit

Full faith and credit shall be accorded by the courts of the States and the courts of the United States to the judgment of any other such court ordering or denying the return of a child, pursuant to the Convention, in an action brought under this chapter.

(h) Remedies under Convention not exclusive

The remedies established by the Convention and this chapter shall be in addition to remedies available under other laws or international agreements.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 100–300, § 4, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 438.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1988Enacted · Pub. L. 100-300 · 102 Stat. 438

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 100-300 on 1988-04-29.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case