ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

23 U.S.C. § 150National goals and performance management measures

submitted 14 years ago by Pub. L. 112-141 to r/title-23-HIGHWAYS · 820 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law sets national goals for the federal highway program, like safety, road condition, and less congestion. The Secretary of Transportation must create performance measures and let each state set its own targets. States then report to the Secretary on how well they're meeting those targets.

(a) Declaration of Policy. This law says performance management will change how the federal-aid highway program works. It refocuses the program on national goals, makes it more accountable and open, and helps officials make better project decisions through performance-based planning and funding. (b) National Goals. The law sets seven national goals for the federal highway program. Safety: significantly cut traffic deaths and serious injuries on all public roads. Infrastructure condition: keep the highway system in a state of good repair. Congestion reduction: significantly cut congestion on the National Highway System. System reliability: make the surface transportation system run more efficiently. Freight movement and economic vitality: improve the National Highway Freight Network, help rural communities reach national and global trade markets, and support regional economic growth. Environmental sustainability: improve how the transportation system performs while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. Reduced project delivery delays: cut project costs, support jobs and the economy, and speed up how fast people and goods move, by removing delays in project development and delivery, cutting regulatory burdens, and improving how agencies work. (c) Establishment of Performance Measures. Within 18 months of this law's enactment, the Secretary — working with state transportation departments, metropolitan planning organizations, and other stakeholders — must issue a rule setting performance measures and standards. In writing that rule, the Secretary must give everyone at least 90 days to comment, must actually consider those comments, and can only create performance measures within the categories this subsection lists. For the national highway performance program under section 119, the Secretary must set: minimum standards for how states manage bridges and pavement; ways for states to measure the condition of Interstate pavement, the condition of non-Interstate National Highway System pavement, the condition of National Highway System bridges, and the performance of both the Interstate System and the rest of the National Highway System; minimum acceptable pavement condition levels on the Interstate System, used only for one specific funding purpose; and the data states must collect to run this system. If pavement conditions differ a lot by region for reasons beyond anyone's control, the Secretary may set different minimum levels for different regions. For the highway safety improvement program under section 148, the Secretary must set ways for states to measure serious injuries and deaths per mile driven, and the total count of serious injuries and deaths. For the congestion mitigation and air quality program under section 149, the Secretary must set ways for states to measure traffic congestion and roadway emissions. For national freight movement, the Secretary must set ways for states to measure how freight moves on the Interstate System. (d) Establishment of Performance Targets. Within a year after the Secretary finishes the rule from subsection (c), each state must set its own targets for the measures described above. A state may set different targets for urban areas and rural areas if that makes sense. (e) Reporting on Performance Targets. Starting four years after this law's enactment, and every two years after that, each state must send the Secretary a report covering: the condition and performance of the National Highway System in that state; how well the state's investment strategy is working for the National Highway System; the state's progress toward the targets it set under subsection (d); and how the state is addressing congestion at freight bottlenecks, including ones named in the national freight strategic plan.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Declaration of Policy.—

Performance management will transform the Federal-aid highway program and provide a means to the most efficient investment of Federal transportation funds by refocusing on national transportation goals, increasing the accountability and transparency of the Federal-aid highway program, and improving project decisionmaking through performance-based planning and programming.

(b)National Goals.—

It is in the interest of the United States to focus the Federal-aid highway program on the following national goals:

(1)Safety.—

To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

(2)Infrastructure condition.—

To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair.

(3)Congestion reduction.—

To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System.

(4)System reliability.—

To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system.

(5)Freight movement and economic vitality.—

To improve the National Highway Freight Network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development.

(6)Environmental sustainability.—

To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.

(7)Reduced project delivery delays.—

To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies’ work practices.

(c)Establishment of Performance Measures.—
(1)In general.—

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the MAP–21, the Secretary, in consultation with State departments of transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, and other stakeholders, shall promulgate a rulemaking that establishes performance measures and standards.

(2)Administration.—

In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—

(A)

provide States, metropolitan planning organizations, and other stakeholders not less than 90 days to comment on any regulation proposed by the Secretary under that paragraph;

(B)

take into consideration any comments relating to a proposed regulation received during that comment period; and

(C)

limit performance measures only to those described in this subsection.

(3)National highway performance program.—
(A)In general.—

Subject to subparagraph (B), for the purpose of carrying out section 119, the Secretary shall establish—

(i)

minimum standards for States to use in developing and operating bridge and pavement management systems;

(ii)

measures for States to use to assess—

(I)

the condition of pavements on the Interstate system;

(II)

the condition of pavements on the National Highway System (excluding the Interstate);

(III)

the condition of bridges on the National Highway System;

(IV)

the performance of the Interstate System; and

(V)

the performance of the National Highway System (excluding the Interstate System);

(iii)

minimum levels for the condition of pavement on the Interstate System, only for the purposes of carrying out section 119(f)(1); and

(iv)

the data elements that are necessary to collect and maintain standardized data to carry out a performance-based approach.

(B)Regions.—

In establishing minimum condition levels under subparagraph (A)(iii), if the Secretary determines that various geographic regions of the United States experience disparate factors contributing to the condition of pavement on the Interstate System in those regions, the Secretary may establish different minimum levels for each region.

(4)Highway safety improvement program.—

For the purpose of carrying out section 148, the Secretary shall establish measures for States to use to assess—

(A)

serious injuries and fatalities per vehicle mile traveled; and

(B)

the number of serious injuries and fatalities.

(5)Congestion mitigation and air quality program.—

For the purpose of carrying out section 149, the Secretary shall establish measures for States to use to assess—

(A)

traffic congestion; and

(B)

on-road mobile source emissions.

(6)National freight movement.—

The Secretary shall establish measures for States to use to assess freight movement on the Interstate System.

(d)Establishment of Performance Targets.—
(1)In general.—

Not later than 1 year after the Secretary has promulgated the final rulemaking under subsection (c), each State shall set performance targets that reflect the measures identified in paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6) of subsection (c).

(2)Different approaches for urban and rural areas.—

In the development and implementation of any performance target, a State may, as appropriate, provide for different performance targets for urbanized and rural areas.

(e)Reporting on Performance Targets.—

Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of the MAP–21 and biennially thereafter, a State shall submit to the Secretary a report that describes—

(1)

the condition and performance of the National Highway System in the State;

(2)

the effectiveness of the investment strategy document in the State asset management plan for the National Highway System;

(3)

progress in achieving performance targets identified under subsection (d); and

(4)

the ways in which the State is addressing congestion at freight bottlenecks, including those identified in the national freight strategic plan, within the State.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, § 1203(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 524, amended Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, § 1446(a)(4)–(6), (d)(2)(A), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1437, 1438.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2012Enacted · Pub. L. 112-141 · 126 Stat. 524

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 112-141 on 2012-07-06.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case