ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

26 U.S.C. § 174Amortization of research and experimental expenditures

submitted 72 years ago by ch. 736 to r/title-26-INTERNAL-REVENUE-CODE · 371 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Businesses can't fully deduct research costs tied to research done outside the United States. Instead, they must capitalize those costs and deduct them gradually over 15 years. A few exceptions and special rules apply.

(a) In general: If a taxpayer has "foreign research or experimental expenditures" for a tax year, two rules apply. First, the taxpayer normally can't deduct these costs right away. Second, instead the taxpayer must: (A) treat the costs as capital costs, and (B) deduct them a little at a time, evenly, over 15 years, starting at the midpoint of the year the costs were paid or incurred. (b) Foreign research or experimental expenditures: This term means research or experimental costs the taxpayer pays or incurs during the year, connected to the taxpayer's trade or business, that count as "foreign research" under section 41(d)(4)(F). (c) Special rules: (1) Land and other property: This section does not apply to money spent to buy or improve land. It also doesn't apply to buying or improving property used in the research, if that property already qualifies for a depreciation deduction (section 167) or a depletion deduction (section 611). But depreciation and depletion allowances on that property still count as research expenditures for this section. (2) Exploration expenditures: This section doesn't apply to money spent to find out whether ore, minerals, oil, or gas deposits exist, and where and how much there is. (3) Software development: Money spent developing software counts as a research or experimental expenditure. (d) Treatment upon disposition, retirement, or abandonment: If the taxpayer disposes of, retires, or abandons property tied to these expenditures while still amortizing them, that event does not create any extra deduction or reduce the amount realized. The 15-year amortization deduction keeps going anyway.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

In the case of a taxpayer’s foreign research or experimental expenditures for any taxable year

(1)

except as provided in paragraph (2), no deduction shall be allowed for such expenditures, and

(2)

the taxpayer shall—

(A)

charge such expenditures to capital account, and

(B)

be allowed an amortization deduction of such expenditures ratably over the 15-year period beginning with the midpoint of the taxable year in which such expenditures are paid or incurred.

(b) Foreign research or experimental expenditures

For purposes of this section, the term “foreign research or experimental expenditures” means, with respect to any taxable year, research or experimental expenditures which are paid or incurred by the taxpayer during such taxable year in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business and which are attributable to foreign research (within the meaning of section 41(d)(4)(F)).

(c) Special rules
(1) Land and other property

This section shall not apply to any expenditure for the acquisition or improvement of land, or for the acquisition or improvement of property to be used in connection with the research or experimentation and of a character which is subject to the allowance under section 167 (relating to allowance for depreciation, etc.) or section 611 (relating to allowance for depletion); but for purposes of this section allowances under section 167, and allowances under section 611, shall be considered as expenditures.

(2) Exploration expenditures

This section shall not apply to any expenditure paid or incurred for the purpose of ascertaining the existence, location, extent, or quality of any deposit of ore or other mineral (including oil and gas).

(3) Software development

For purposes of this section, any amount paid or incurred in connection with the development of any software shall be treated as a research or experimental expenditure.

(d) Treatment upon disposition, retirement, or abandonment

If any property with respect to which foreign research or experimental expenditures are paid or incurred is disposed, retired, or abandoned during the period during which such expenditures are allowed as an amortization deduction under this section, no deduction or reduction to amount realized shall be allowed with respect to such expenditures on account of such disposition, retirement, or abandonment and such amortization deduction shall continue with respect to such expenditures.

Source credit: (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 66; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, §§ 1901(a)(30), 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1769, 1834; Pub. L. 97–248, title II, § 201(d)(9)(B) formerly § 201(c)(9)(B), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 420, renumbered § 201(d)(9)(B), Pub. L. 97–448, title III, § 306(a)(1)(A)(i), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2400; amended Pub. L. 99–514, title VII, § 701(e)(4)(D), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2343; Pub. L. 100–647, title I, § 1007(g)(5), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3435; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, § 7110(d), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2325; Pub. L. 113–295, div. A, title II, § 221(a)(31), (32), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 4042; Pub. L. 115–97, title I, § 13206(a), Dec. 22, 2017, 131 Stat. 2111; Pub. L. 119–21, title VII, § 70302(b)(1), July 4, 2025, 139 Stat. 191.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1954Enacted · Act of Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736
  • 1976Amended · Pub. L. 94-455 · 90 Stat. 1769, 1834
  • 1982Amended · Pub. L. 97-248 · 96 Stat. 420
  • 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-514 · 100 Stat. 2343
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-647 · 102 Stat. 3435
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-239 · 103 Stat. 2325
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-295 · 128 Stat. 4042
  • 2017Amended · Pub. L. 115-97 · 131 Stat. 2111
  • 2025Amended · Pub. L. 119-21 · 139 Stat. 191

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 736 on 1954-08-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case