ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

26 U.S.C. § 273Holders of life or terminable interest

submitted 72 years ago by ch. 736 to r/title-26-INTERNAL-REVENUE-CODE · 66 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law protects a person who holds a "life or terminable interest" received as a gift, bequest, or inheritance. No state, DC, U.S. territory, or foreign country can cut the income paid to that person by treating the interest's natural decline in value as a deduction.

This section protects a person who holds a "life or terminable interest" — a right to income that lasts for someone's life, or that ends at a set time — when that interest came to them as a gift, a bequest, or an inheritance. Under the laws of a state, the District of Columbia, a U.S. possession, or a foreign country, the amount paid to that person as income cannot be reduced or diminished. Specifically, no deduction is allowed for "shrinkage" — meaning any drop in the value of the interest that happens simply because time has passed and the interest is running out — no matter what that kind of deduction is called.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Amounts paid under the laws of a State, the District of Columbia, a possession of the United States, or a foreign country as income to the holder of a life or terminable interest acquired by gift, bequest, or inheritance shall not be reduced or diminished by any deduction for shrinkage (by whatever name called) in the value of such interest due to the lapse of time.

Source credit: (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 83; Pub. L. 94–455, title XIX, § 1901(c)(2), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1803.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1954Enacted · Act of Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736
  • 1976Amended · Pub. L. 94-455 · 90 Stat. 1803

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 736 on 1954-08-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case