ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

26 U.S.C. § 7482Courts of review

submitted 72 years ago by ch. 736 to r/title-26-INTERNAL-REVENUE-CODE · 1,024 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Federal Courts of Appeals - not the Tax Court itself - review Tax Court decisions, similar to how they review trial court rulings. Which specific circuit court hears the case usually depends on where the taxpayer lives or does business. Courts can affirm, change, or reverse a Tax Court decision, and can penalize frivolous appeals.

(a) Jurisdiction: (1) In general: the U.S. Courts of Appeals (except the Federal Circuit) have exclusive power to review Tax Court decisions, the same way they review civil trial court cases decided without a jury - except as 28 U.S.C. § 1254 allows. That Court of Appeals decision is final, but the Supreme Court can still review it through a certiorari petition under the same section. (2)(A) Interlocutory orders: if a Tax Court judge says, in a mid-case order, that a major legal question is genuinely disputed and that an immediate appeal could speed up the case's resolution, the Court of Appeals can - at its discretion - allow an appeal from that order, if asked within 10 days of the order. Neither asking for, nor getting, this kind of appeal automatically pauses the Tax Court case, unless a Tax Court judge or the Court of Appeals orders a pause. (B) For purposes of (b) and (c), this kind of order counts as a Tax Court decision. (C) If a Court of Appeals allows this kind of appeal, any later review of the case (except as (b)(2) provides) goes to that same Court of Appeals. (3) Certain orders under section 6213(a): a Tax Court order under section 6213(a) that resolves a request to stop an assessment or collection counts as a Tax Court decision for this section, and can be reviewed by the Court of Appeals the same way a similar district court order can. (b) Venue: (1) Generally, the right Court of Appeals depends on the type of case: (A) for an individual disputing their tax bill, it is the circuit where they legally live; (B) for a corporation, it is the circuit of its main place of business, or if none, the circuit where its tax return was filed; (C) for someone seeking a declaratory decision under section 7476, it is the circuit of the employer's main place of business; (D) for an organization seeking a declaratory decision under section 7428, it is the circuit of the organization's main office; (E) for a partnership case under section 6234, it is the circuit of the partnership's main place of business; (F) for a case under section 6015(e), it is the circuit where the petitioner legally lives; and (G) for a case under section 6320 or 6330, it is (i) the petitioner's home circuit if an individual, or (ii) the circuit of their main place of business if an entity. If none of these fit, the case goes to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Residence or place of business is measured as of when the case was filed with the Tax Court. (2) By agreement: instead of following (1), the IRS and the taxpayer can agree in writing to have any Court of Appeals review the case. (3) Declaratory judgment cases about certain government obligations: a Tax Court decision under section 7478 can only be reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. (c) Powers: (1) To affirm, modify, or reverse: the reviewing court can affirm the Tax Court's decision, or - if it was not decided in accordance with law - modify or reverse it, with or without sending it back for a new hearing, as fairness requires. (2) To make rules: rules for reviewing Tax Court decisions are the ones the Supreme Court sets under 28 U.S.C. § 2072. (3) To require additional security: nothing in section 7483 stops the court from requiring the petitioner to post a bond or other security as a condition of review. (4) To impose penalties: the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court can make a taxpayer pay a penalty to the United States if the Tax Court's decision is affirmed and the appeal was mainly meant to cause delay, or the taxpayer's position was frivolous or groundless.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Jurisdiction
(1) In general

The United States Courts of Appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have exclusive jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Tax Court, except as provided in section 1254 of Title 28 of the United States Code, in the same manner and to the same extent as decisions of the district courts in civil actions tried without a jury; and the judgment of any such court shall be final, except that it shall be subject to review by the Supreme Court of the United States upon certiorari, in the manner provided in section 1254 of Title 28 of the United States Code.

(2) Interlocutory orders
(A) In general

When any judge of the Tax Court includes in an interlocutory order a statement that a controlling question of law is involved with respect to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from that order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the United States Court of Appeals may, in its discretion, permit an appeal to be taken from such order, if application is made to it within 10 days after the entry of such order. Neither the application for nor the granting of an appeal under this paragraph shall stay proceedings in the Tax Court, unless a stay is ordered by a judge of the Tax Court or by the United States Court of Appeals which has jurisdiction of the appeal or a judge of that court.

(B) Order treated as Tax Court decision

For purposes of subsections (b) and (c), an order described in this paragraph shall be treated as a decision of the Tax Court.

(C) Venue for review of subsequent proceedings

If a United States Court of Appeals permits an appeal to be taken from an order described in subparagraph (A), except as provided in subsection (b)(2), any subsequent review of the decision of the Tax Court in the proceeding shall be made by such Court of Appeals.

(3) Certain orders entered under section 6213(a)

An order of the Tax Court which is entered under authority of section 6213(a) and which resolves a proceeding to restrain assessment or collection shall be treated as a decision of the Tax Court for purposes of this section and shall be subject to the same review by the United States Court of Appeals as a similar order of a district court.

(b) Venue
(1) In general

Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), such decisions may be reviewed by the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which is located—

(A)

in the case of a petitioner seeking redetermination of tax liability other than a corporation, the legal residence of the petitioner,

(B)

in the case of a corporation seeking redetermination of tax liability, the principal place of business or principal office or agency of the corporation, or, if it has no principal place of business or principal office or agency in any judicial circuit, then the office to which was made the return of the tax in respect of which the liability arises,

(C)

in the case of a person seeking a declaratory decision under section 7476, the principal place of business, or principal office or agency of the employer,

(D)

in the case of an organization seeking a declaratory decision under section 7428, the principal office or agency of the organization,

(E)

in the case of a petition under section 6234, the principal place of business of the partnership,

(F)

in the case of a petition under section 6015(e), the legal residence of the petitioner, or

(G)

in the case of a petition under section 6320 or 6330—

(i)

the legal residence of the petitioner if the petitioner is an individual, and

(ii)

the principal place of business or principal office or agency if the petitioner is an entity other than an individual.

If for any reason no subparagraph of the preceding sentence applies, then such decisions may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. For purposes of this paragraph, the legal residence, principal place of business, or principal office or agency referred to herein shall be determined as of the time the petition seeking redetermination of tax liability was filed with the Tax Court or as of the time the petition seeking a declaratory decision under section 7428 or 7476, or the petition under section 6234, was filed with the Tax Court.

(2) By agreement

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), such decisions may be reviewed by any United States Court of Appeals which may be designated by the Secretary and the taxpayer by stipulation in writing.

(3) Declaratory judgment actions relating to status of certain governmental obligations

In the case of any decision of the Tax Court in a proceeding under section 7478, such decision may only be reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

(c) Powers
(1) To affirm, modify, or reverse

Upon such review, such courts shall have power to affirm or, if the decision of the Tax Court is not in accordance with law, to modify or to reverse the decision of the Tax Court, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing, as justice may require.

(2) To make rules

Rules for review of decisions of the Tax Court shall be those prescribed by the Supreme Court under section 2072 of title 28 of the United States Code.

(3) To require additional security

Nothing in section 7483 shall be construed as relieving the petitioner from making or filing such undertakings as the court may require as a condition of or in connection with the review.

(4) To impose penalties

The United States Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court shall have the power to require the taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty in any case where the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed and it appears that the appeal was instituted or maintained primarily for delay or that the taxpayer’s position in the appeal is frivolous or groundless.

Source credit: (Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736, 68A Stat. 890; Pub. L. 89–713, § 3(c), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1109; Pub. L. 91–172, title IX, § 960(h)(2), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat 735; Pub. L. 93–406, title II, § 1041(b)(3), Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 950; Pub. L. 94–455, title X, § 1042(d)(2)(A), (B), title XIII, § 1306(b)(4), (5), title XIX, § 1906(b)(13)(A), Oct. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1638, 1639, 1719, 1834; Pub. L. 95–600, title III, § 336(c)(1), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2842; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 154, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 47; Pub. L. 97–248, title IV, § 402(c)(15), Sept. 3, 1982, 96 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title I, § 131(e)(2)(A), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 665; Pub. L. 99–514, title XV, § 1558(a), (b), title XVIII, §§ 1810(g)(2), 1899A(60), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2757, 2758, 2828, 2962; Pub. L. 100–647, title VI, § 6243(b), Nov. 10, 1988, 102 Stat. 3750; Pub. L. 101–239, title VII, § 7731(b), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2401; Pub. L. 105–34, title XII, §§ 1222(b)(3), 1239(d), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 1019, 1028; Pub. L. 114–74, title XI, § 1101(f)(13), Nov. 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 638; Pub. L. 114–113, div. Q, title IV, § 423(a), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3123.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1954Enacted · Act of Aug. 16, 1954, ch. 736
  • 1966Amended · Pub. L. 89-713 · 80 Stat. 1109
  • 1969Amended · Pub. L. 91-172
  • 1974Amended · Pub. L. 93-406 · 88 Stat. 950
  • 1976Amended · Pub. L. 94-455 · 90 Stat. 1638, 1639, 1719, 1834
  • 1978Amended · Pub. L. 95-600 · 92 Stat. 2842
  • 1982Amended · Pub. L. 97-164 · 96 Stat. 47
  • 1982Amended · Pub. L. 97-248 · 96 Stat. 668
  • 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-369 · 98 Stat. 665
  • 1986Amended · Pub. L. 99-514 · 100 Stat. 2757, 2758, 2828, 2962
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-647 · 102 Stat. 3750
  • 1989Amended · Pub. L. 101-239 · 103 Stat. 2401
  • 1997Amended · Pub. L. 105-34 · 111 Stat. 1019, 1028
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-74 · 129 Stat. 638
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-113 · 129 Stat. 3123

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 736 on 1954-08-16.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case