ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 2261Prisoners in State custody subject to capital sentence; appointment of counsel; requirement of rule of court or statute; procedures for appointment

submitted 30 years ago by Pub. L. 104-132 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 333 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This chapter applies to certain capital cases brought under § 2254 only when specified counsel conditions are met. It requires an available counsel mechanism and limits relief based on counsel’s ineffectiveness.

(a) This chapter applies to § 2254 cases brought by state prisoners under a capital sentence, but only if subsections (b) and (c) are satisfied. (b) Counsel. The chapter applies if (1) the Attorney General certifies that the State has a § 2265 counsel mechanism and (2) counsel was appointed under it, the prisoner validly waived counsel, the prisoner retained counsel, or the prisoner was found not indigent. (c) The mechanism must offer counsel to every state prisoner under a capital sentence and require a court of record to enter an order (1) appointing one or more lawyers after finding the prisoner indigent and accepting the offer or unable to decide competently whether to accept it; (2) finding, after a hearing if needed, that the prisoner rejected counsel knowingly and understood the legal consequences; or (3) denying counsel after finding the prisoner not indigent. (d) Appointed counsel may not previously have represented the prisoner at trial in the case, unless the prisoner and counsel expressly request continued representation. (e) Ineffective or incompetent counsel during state or federal post-conviction proceedings in a capital case is not a ground for relief under § 2254. This does not prevent appointing different counsel, on the court’s own initiative or the prisoner’s request, at any phase of those proceedings because existing counsel was ineffective or incompetent.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

This chapter shall apply to cases arising under section 2254 brought by prisoners in State custody who are subject to a capital sentence. It shall apply only if the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) are satisfied.

(b)Counsel.—

This chapter is applicable if—

(1)

the Attorney General of the United States certifies that a State has established a mechanism for providing counsel in postconviction proceedings as provided in section 2265; and

(2)

counsel was appointed pursuant to that mechanism, petitioner validly waived counsel, petitioner retained counsel, or petitioner was found not to be indigent.

(c)

Any mechanism for the appointment, compensation, and reimbursement of counsel as provided in subsection (b) must offer counsel to all State prisoners under capital sentence and must provide for the entry of an order by a court of record—

(1)

appointing one or more counsels to represent the prisoner upon a finding that the prisoner is indigent and accepted the offer or is unable competently to decide whether to accept or reject the offer;

(2)

finding, after a hearing if necessary, that the prisoner rejected the offer of counsel and made the decision with an understanding of its legal consequences; or

(3)

denying the appointment of counsel upon a finding that the prisoner is not indigent.

(d)

No counsel appointed pursuant to subsections (b) and (c) to represent a State prisoner under capital sentence shall have previously represented the prisoner at trial in the case for which the appointment is made unless the prisoner and counsel expressly request continued representation.

(e)

The ineffectiveness or incompetence of counsel during State or Federal post-conviction proceedings in a capital case shall not be a ground for relief in a proceeding arising under section 2254. This limitation shall not preclude the appointment of different counsel, on the court’s own motion or at the request of the prisoner, at any phase of State or Federal post-conviction proceedings on the basis of the ineffectiveness or incompetence of counsel in such proceedings.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1221; amended Pub. L. 109–177, title V, § 507(a), (b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 250.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1996Enacted · Pub. L. 104-132 · 110 Stat. 1221
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-177 · 120 Stat. 250

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-132 on 1996-04-24.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case