ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

28 U.S.C. § 2467 — Enforcement of foreign judgment

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-185 to r/title-28-JUDICIARY-AND-JUDICIAL-PROCEDURE · 1,133 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A qualifying foreign nation must first ask the Attorney General to certify its request to enforce a foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment. If the request is certified, the United States may apply in a United States district court on the foreign nation’s behalf, and the section sets the court’s procedures, limits, and enforcement rules.

(a) Definitions.—This section defines two terms.

(1) “Foreign nation” means either a country that is a party to the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (called the “United Nations Convention” in this section), or a foreign jurisdiction that has a treaty or another formal international agreement with the United States that is in effect and provides for mutual help with forfeitures.

(2) “Forfeiture or confiscation judgment” means a final order from a foreign nation that requires a person or entity to do one of the following:

(A) Pay money representing the proceeds of: an offense described in Article 3, Paragraph 1, of the United Nations Convention; a violation of foreign law that would be a violation or offense for which property could be forfeited under Federal law if it happened in the United States; or a foreign offense described in section 1956(c)(7)(B) of title 18. It also includes an order requiring payment of the value of property that corresponds to those proceeds.

(B) Forfeit property that was involved in, or can be traced to, the commission of such an offense.

(b) Review by Attorney General.—

(1) In general.—A foreign nation that wants a United States district court to register and enforce one of these judgments must first send a request to the Attorney General or the Attorney General’s designee. The request must include:

(A) a summary of the case’s facts and a description of the proceedings that led to the judgment;

(B) a certified copy of the judgment;

(C) an affidavit or sworn declaration showing that the foreign nation took steps consistent with due process to notify every person with an interest in the property about the proceedings early enough for that person to defend against the charges, and showing that the judgment is in force and cannot be appealed; and

(D) any other information and evidence that the Attorney General or the Attorney General’s designee requires.

(2) Certification of request.—The Attorney General or the designee must decide whether certifying the request would be in the interest of justice. That decision is final. No court may review it, and it is not reviewable under subchapter II of chapter 5 or chapter 7 of title 5, commonly called the “Administrative Procedure Act.”

(c) Jurisdiction and venue.—

(1) In general.—If the Attorney General or the designee certifies the request, the United States may file an application in a United States district court on behalf of the foreign nation. The application may ask the court to enforce the foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment as though a United States court had entered it.

(2) Proceedings.—In a proceeding filed under paragraph (1):

(A) the United States is the applicant. The defendant, or another person or entity affected by the judgment, is the respondent;

(B) the case may be filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia, or in any other district where the defendant or property that could be used to satisfy a judgment under this section may be found; and

(C) the district court has personal jurisdiction over a defendant who lives outside the United States if the defendant is served with process under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(d) Entry and enforcement of judgment.—

(1) In general.—The district court must enter the orders needed to enforce the judgment on behalf of the foreign nation unless it finds one of these exceptions:

(A) the judgment came from a system whose tribunals or procedures do not meet the requirements of due process of law;

(B) the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant;

(C) the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter;

(D) the foreign nation did not take steps consistent with due process to notify a person with an interest in the property about the proceedings early enough for that person to defend; or

(E) the judgment was obtained by fraud.

(2) Process.—The process used to enforce a judgment under this section must follow Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(3) Preservation of property.—

(A) Restraining orders.—

(i) In general.—To keep property available for civil or criminal forfeiture under foreign law, the Government may apply for a restraining order, and the court may issue one, at any time before or after a foreign nation begins forfeiture proceedings.

(ii) Procedures.—

(I) In general.—A restraining order under this subparagraph must be issued in a way consistent with subparagraphs (A), (C), and (E) of paragraph (1), as well as the procedural due-process protections for a restraining order under section 983(j) of title 18.

(II) Application.—When applying section 983(j):

(aa) references in that section to civil forfeiture or filing a complaint are treated as references to the applicable foreign criminal or forfeiture proceedings; and

(bb) the reference in section 983(j)(1)(B)(i) to the United States is treated as a reference to the foreign nation.

(B) Evidence.—When issuing a restraining order under subparagraph (A), the court may do either of the following:

(i) rely on information in an affidavit that describes the proceeding or investigation taking place in the foreign country and gives a reasonable basis for believing that the property to be restrained will be named in a forfeiture judgment when that proceeding ends; or

(ii) register and enforce a restraining order issued by a court with proper jurisdiction in the foreign country if the Attorney General certified it under subsection (b)(2).

(C) Limit on grounds for objection.—A person may not object to a restraining order under subparagraph (A) on a ground that is the subject of parallel litigation about the same property that is pending in a foreign court.

(e) Finality of foreign findings.—When entering orders to enforce the judgment, the court must accept the foreign court’s findings of fact to the extent the foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment states those findings.

(f) Currency conversion.—To calculate the amount stated in a forfeiture or confiscation judgment that requires payment of money and is submitted for registration, the court must use the exchange rate in effect when the suit to enforce the judgment is filed by the foreign nation.

This section does not define the terms “due process,” “personal jurisdiction,” “jurisdiction over the subject matter,” “fraud,” “restraining order,” “process,” “parallel litigation,” “findings of fact,” or “rate of exchange.”

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Definitions.—

In this section—

(1)

the term “foreign nation” means a country that has become a party to the United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (referred to in this section as the “United Nations Convention”) or a foreign jurisdiction with which the United States has a treaty or other formal international agreement in effect providing for mutual forfeiture assistance; and

(2)

the term “forfeiture or confiscation judgment” means a final order of a foreign nation compelling a person or entity—

(A)

to pay a sum of money representing the proceeds of an offense described in Article 3, Paragraph 1, of the United Nations Convention, any violation of foreign law that would constitute a violation or an offense for which property could be forfeited under Federal law if the offense were committed in the United States, or any foreign offense described in section 1956(c)(7)(B) of title 18, or property the value of which corresponds to such proceeds; or

(B)

to forfeit property involved in or traceable to the commission of such offense.

(b)Review by Attorney General.—
(1)In general.—

A foreign nation seeking to have a forfeiture or confiscation judgment registered and enforced by a district court of the United States under this section shall first submit a request to the Attorney General or the designee of the Attorney General, which request shall include—

(A)

a summary of the facts of the case and a description of the proceedings that resulted in the forfeiture or confiscation judgment;

(B)

certified 1 copy of the forfeiture or confiscation judgment;

(C)

an affidavit or sworn declaration establishing that the foreign nation took steps, in accordance with the principles of due process, to give notice of the proceedings to all persons with an interest in the property in sufficient time to enable such persons to defend against the charges and that the judgment rendered is in force and is not subject to appeal; and

(D)

such additional information and evidence as may be required by the Attorney General or the designee of the Attorney General.

(2)Certification of request.—

The Attorney General or the designee of the Attorney General shall determine whether, in the interest of justice, to certify the request, and such decision shall be final and not subject to either judicial review or review under subchapter II of chapter 5, or chapter 7, of title 5 (commonly known as the “Administrative Procedure Act”).

(c)Jurisdiction and Venue.—
(1)In general.—

If the Attorney General or the designee of the Attorney General certifies a request under subsection (b), the United States may file an application on behalf of a foreign nation in district court of the United States seeking to enforce the foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment as if the judgment had been entered by a court in the United States.

(2)Proceedings.—

In a proceeding filed under paragraph (1)—

(A)

the United States shall be the applicant and the defendant or another person or entity affected by the forfeiture or confiscation judgment shall be the respondent;

(B)

venue shall lie in the district court for the District of Columbia or in any other district in which the defendant or the property that may be the basis for satisfaction of a judgment under this section may be found; and

(C)

the district court shall have personal jurisdiction over a defendant residing outside of the United States if the defendant is served with process in accordance with rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(d)Entry and Enforcement of Judgment.—
(1)In general.—

The district court shall enter such orders as may be necessary to enforce the judgment on behalf of the foreign nation unless the court finds that—

(A)

the judgment was rendered under a system that provides tribunals or procedures incompatible with the requirements of due process of law;

(B)

the foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant;

(C)

the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter;

(D)

the foreign nation did not take steps, in accordance with the principles of due process, to give notice of the proceedings to a person with an interest in the property of the proceedings 2 in sufficient time to enable him or her to defend; or

(E)

the judgment was obtained by fraud.

(2)Process.—

Process to enforce a judgment under this section shall be in accordance with rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(3)Preservation of property.—
(A)Restraining orders.—
(i)In general.—

To preserve the availability of property subject to civil or criminal forfeiture under foreign law, the Government may apply for, and the court may issue, a restraining order at any time before or after the initiation of forfeiture proceedings by a foreign nation.

(ii)Procedures.—
(I)In general.—

A restraining order under this subparagraph shall be issued in a manner consistent with subparagraphs (A), (C), and (E) of paragraph (1) and the procedural due process protections for a restraining order under section 983(j) of title 18.

(II)Application.—

For purposes of applying such section 983(j)—

(aa)

references in such section 983(j) to civil forfeiture or the filing of a complaint shall be deemed to refer to the applicable foreign criminal or forfeiture proceedings; and

(bb)

the reference in paragraph (1)(B)(i) of such section 983(j) to the United States shall be deemed to refer to the foreign nation.

(B)Evidence.—

The court, in issuing a restraining order under subparagraph (A)—

(i)

may rely on information set forth in an affidavit describing the nature of the proceeding or investigation underway in the foreign country, and setting forth a reasonable basis to believe that the property to be restrained will be named in a judgment of forfeiture at the conclusion of such proceeding; or

(ii)

may register and enforce a restraining order that has been issued by a court of competent jurisdiction in the foreign country and certified by the Attorney General pursuant to subsection (b)(2).

(C)Limit on grounds for objection.—

No person may object to a restraining order under subparagraph (A) on any ground that is the subject of parallel litigation involving the same property that is pending in a foreign court.

(e)Finality of Foreign Findings.—

In entering orders to enforce the judgment, the court shall be bound by the findings of fact to the extent that they are stated in the foreign forfeiture or confiscation judgment.

(f)Currency Conversion.—

The rate of exchange in effect at the time the suit to enforce is filed by the foreign nation shall be used in calculating the amount stated in any forfeiture or confiscation judgment requiring the payment of a sum of money submitted for registration.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 106–185, § 15(a), Apr. 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 219; amended Pub. L. 107–56, title III, § 323, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 315; Pub. L. 111–342, § 2, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3607.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-185 · 114 Stat. 219
  • 2001Amended · Pub. L. 107-56 · 115 Stat. 315
  • 2010Amended · Pub. L. 111-342 · 124 Stat. 3607

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-185 on 2000-04-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case