ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

33 U.S.C. § 1296 — Determination of priority of projects

submitted 78 years ago by Pub. L. 95-217 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 256 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Each State alone sets the priority of categories of publicly owned treatment-works projects, subject to removal of projects that will not meet enforceable requirements. At least 25 percent of certain State funds must go to specified sewer and overflow projects when eligible and listed.

Despite other provisions of this chapter, each State alone determines the priority of project categories for publicly owned treatment works in that State. If the Administrator, after a public hearing, finds that a specific project will not comply with enforceable requirements, the project must be removed from the State priority list and the State must submit a revised list. Categories include (A) secondary treatment, (B) more stringent treatment, (C) infiltration-and-inflow correction, (D) major sewer rehabilitation, (E) new collector sewers and related items, (F) new interceptors and related items, and (G) correction of combined sewer overflows. At least 25 percent of funds allocated to a State in a fiscal year under this subchapter for publicly owned treatment works must be obligated for projects in categories D through G if they are on that year's priority list and otherwise eligible. Congress states that federally assisted wastewater projects by States, municipalities, or intermunicipal or interstate agencies should, in the State's estimation, achieve optimum water-quality management consistent with this chapter's public-health and water-quality goals and requirements.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the determination of the priority to be given each category of projects for construction of publicly owned treatment works within each State shall be made solely by that State, except that if the Administrator, after a public hearing, determines that a specific project will not result in compliance with the enforceable requirements of this chapter, such project shall be removed from the State’s priority list and such State shall submit a revised priority list. These categories shall include, but not be limited to (A) secondary treatment, (B) more stringent treatment, (C) infiltration-in-flow correction, (D) major sewer system rehabilitation, (E) new collector sewers and appurtenances, (F) new interceptors and appurtenances, and (G) correction of combined sewer overflows. Not less than 25 per centum of funds allocated to a State in any fiscal year under this subchapter for construction of publicly owned treatment works in such State shall be obligated for those types of projects referred to in clauses (D), (E), (F), and (G) of this section, if such projects are on such State’s priority list for that year and are otherwise eligible for funding in that fiscal year. It is the policy of Congress that projects for wastewater treatment and management undertaken with Federal financial assistance under this chapter by any State, municipality, or intermunicipal or interstate agency shall be projects which, in the estimation of the State, are designed to achieve optimum water quality management, consistent with the public health and water quality goals and requirements of this chapter.

Source credit: (June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, § 216, as added Pub. L. 95–217, § 40, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1582; amended Pub. L. 97–117, § 18, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1630.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1948Enacted · Pub. L. 95-217 · 91 Stat. 1582
  • 1981Amended · Pub. L. 97-117 · 95 Stat. 1630

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-217 on 1948-06-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case