33 U.S.C. § 2 — Regulations for navigation of South and Southwest Passes of Mississippi River; penalties
submitted 117 years ago by ch. 264 to r/title-33-NAVIGATION-AND-NAVIGABLE-WATERS · 199 words · no verdicts yet
The Secretary of the Army can make rules for navigating the South and Southwest Passes of the Mississippi River, to stop channel obstructions and protect the works built there. Willfully breaking those rules is a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of $100 to $500, up to three months in prison, or both.
The Secretary of the Army is authorized to make such rules and regulations for the navigation of the South and Southwest Passes of the Mississippi River as to him shall seem necessary or expedient for the purpose of preventing any obstruction to the channels through said South and Southwest Passes and any injury to the works therein constructed. The term “South and Southwest Passes”, as employed in this section, shall be construed as embracing the entire extent of channel in each case, between the upper ends of the works at the head of the pass and the outer or sea ends of the jetties at the entrance from the Gulf of Mexico; and any willful violation of any rule or regulation made by the Secretary of the Army in pursuance of this section shall be deemed a misdemeanor, for which the owner or owners, agent or agents, master or pilot of the vessel so offending shall be separately or collectively responsible, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than $100, nor exceeding $500, or by imprisonment for not exceeding three months, or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court.
Source credit: (Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 264, § 5, 35 Stat. 818; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, § 205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)
- 1909Enacted · Act of Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 264 · 35 Stat. 818
- 1947Amended · Act of July 26, 1947, ch. 343 · 61 Stat. 501
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 264 on 1909-03-03.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case