ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

35 U.S.C. § 209Licensing federally owned inventions

submitted 46 years ago by Pub. L. 96-517 to r/title-35-PATENTS · 822 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law sets the conditions a federal agency must meet before granting an exclusive license on a government-owned invention. The license must be a real incentive to bring the invention to market, favor small businesses, protect competition, and come with reporting and termination rights.

(a) A federal agency can grant an exclusive or partly exclusive license on a government-owned invention only if all of these are true: granting it is a reasonable, necessary incentive to attract the investment needed to bring the invention to practical use, or to otherwise get it into public use; the agency finds the public will be served, based on the applicant's plans and ability, and the license isn't broader than what's needed to provide that incentive; the applicant commits to actually achieving practical use within a reasonable time (which the agency can extend if a refusal would be unreasonable); the license won't substantially hurt competition or violate federal antitrust law; and, for inventions covered by a foreign patent, it will help U.S. government or industry interests in foreign trade. (b) An agency normally can only grant a license to use or sell the invention in the United States if the licensee agrees that products using the invention will be manufactured substantially in the United States. (c) Among otherwise qualified applicants, small businesses get first preference for these licenses. (d) Every license must include certain terms: the federal government keeps a free, permanent, worldwide right to use the invention itself; the licensee must periodically report on how it's using the invention, but only as much as the agency needs to check compliance, and those reports are kept confidential; and the agency can end the license if the licensee isn't living up to its commitment to bring the invention to practical use and can't show it's on track to do so, if the licensee breaks the U.S.-manufacturing promise in (b), if ending the license is needed to meet new public-use rules the licensee isn't meeting, or if a court finds the licensee violated antitrust law in connection with the license. (e) An agency generally can't grant an exclusive or partly exclusive license without first giving 15 days' public notice of its intent and considering any comments it receives. This notice requirement doesn't apply to inventions made under a cooperative research and development agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980. (f) An agency can't grant a license unless the applicant has given it a plan for developing or marketing the invention; that plan is also kept confidential.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Authority.—

A Federal agency may grant an exclusive or partially exclusive license on a federally owned invention under section 207(a)(2) only if—

(1)

granting the license is a reasonable and necessary incentive to—

(A)

call forth the investment capital and expenditures needed to bring the invention to practical application; or

(B)

otherwise promote the invention’s utilization by the public;

(2)

the Federal agency finds that the public will be served by the granting of the license, as indicated by the applicant’s intentions, plans, and ability to bring the invention to practical application or otherwise promote the invention’s utilization by the public, and that the proposed scope of exclusivity is not greater than reasonably necessary to provide the incentive for bringing the invention to practical application, as proposed by the applicant, or otherwise to promote the invention’s utilization by the public;

(3)

the applicant makes a commitment to achieve practical application of the invention within a reasonable time, which time may be extended by the agency upon the applicant’s request and the applicant’s demonstration that the refusal of such extension would be unreasonable;

(4)

granting the license will not tend to substantially lessen competition or create or maintain a violation of the Federal antitrust laws; and

(5)

in the case of an invention covered by a foreign patent application or patent, the interests of the Federal Government or United States industry in foreign commerce will be enhanced.

(b)Manufacture in United States.—

A Federal agency shall normally grant a license under section 207(a)(2) to use or sell any federally owned invention in the United States only to a licensee who agrees that any products embodying the invention or produced through the use of the invention will be manufactured substantially in the United States.

(c)Small Business.—

First preference for the granting of any exclusive or partially exclusive licenses under section 207(a)(2) shall be given to small business firms having equal or greater likelihood as other applicants to bring the invention to practical application within a reasonable time.

(d)Terms and Conditions.—

Any licenses granted under section 207(a)(2) shall contain such terms and conditions as the granting agency considers appropriate, and shall include provisions—

(1)

retaining a nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license for any Federal agency to practice the invention or have the invention practiced throughout the world by or on behalf of the Government of the United States;

(2)

requiring periodic reporting on utilization of the invention, and utilization efforts, by the licensee, but only to the extent necessary to enable the Federal agency to determine whether the terms of the license are being complied with, except that any such report shall be treated by the Federal agency as commercial and financial information obtained from a person and privileged and confidential and not subject to disclosure under section 552 of title 5; and

(3)

empowering the Federal agency to terminate the license in whole or in part if the agency determines that—

(A)

the licensee is not executing its commitment to achieve practical application of the invention, including commitments contained in any plan submitted in support of its request for a license, and the licensee cannot otherwise demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Federal agency that it has taken, or can be expected to take within a reasonable time, effective steps to achieve practical application of the invention;

(B)

the licensee is in breach of an agreement described in subsection (b);

(C)

termination is necessary to meet requirements for public use specified by Federal regulations issued after the date of the license, and such requirements are not reasonably satisfied by the licensee; or

(D)

the licensee has been found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated the Federal antitrust laws in connection with its performance under the license agreement.

(e)Public Notice.—

No exclusive or partially exclusive license may be granted under section 207(a)(2) unless public notice of the intention to grant an exclusive or partially exclusive license on a federally owned invention has been provided in an appropriate manner at least 15 days before the license is granted, and the Federal agency has considered all comments received before the end of the comment period in response to that public notice. This subsection shall not apply to the licensing of inventions made under a cooperative research and development agreement entered into under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a).

(f)Plan.—

No Federal agency shall grant any license under a patent or patent application on a federally owned invention unless the person requesting the license has supplied the agency with a plan for development or marketing of the invention, except that any such plan shall be treated by the Federal agency as commercial and financial information obtained from a person and privileged and confidential and not subject to disclosure under section 552 of title 5.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 96–517, § 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3024; amended Pub. L. 106–404, § 4(a), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13206(a)(15), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1905; Pub. L. 112–29, § 20(i)(3), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1980Enacted · Pub. L. 96-517 · 94 Stat. 3024
  • 2000Amended · Pub. L. 106-404 · 114 Stat. 1743
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-273 · 116 Stat. 1905
  • 2011Amended · Pub. L. 112-29 · 125 Stat. 335

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 96-517 on 1980-12-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case