38 U.S.C. § 5104B — Higher-level review by the agency of original jurisdiction
submitted 9 years ago by Pub. L. 115-55 to r/title-38-VETERANS-BENEFITS · 278 words · no verdicts yet
A claimant may request higher-level review of an agency decision by a higher-level adjudicator in the agency. The request must be timely and written, and the review uses the existing record and is conducted anew.
(a) In General .— (1) A claimant* may request a review of the decision of the agency of original jurisdiction* by a higher-level adjudicator within the agency of original jurisdiction. (2) The Secretary* must approve each request for review under paragraph (1). (b) Time and Manner of Request .— (1) A request for higher-level review by the agency of original jurisdiction must be— (A) in writing in such form as the Secretary may prescribe; and (B) made within one year of the notice* of the agency of original jurisdiction’s decision. (2) Such request may specifically indicate whether such review is requested by a higher-level adjudicator at the same office within the agency of original jurisdiction or by an adjudicator at a different office of the agency of original jurisdiction. The Secretary must not deny such request for review by an adjudicator at a different office of the agency of original jurisdiction without good cause. (c) Decision .— Notice of a higher-level review decision under this section must be provided to the claimant (and any representative of such claimant) and must include a general statement— (1) reflecting whether evidence was not considered pursuant to subsection (d); and (2) noting the options available to the claimant to have the evidence described in paragraph (1), if any, considered by the Department*. (d) Evidentiary Record for Review .— The evidentiary record before the higher-level adjudicator must be limited to the evidence of record in the agency of original jurisdiction decision being reviewed. (e) De Novo Review .— A review of the decision of the agency of original jurisdiction by a higher-level adjudicator within the agency of original jurisdiction must be de novo.
A claimant* may request a review of the decision of the agency of original jurisdiction* by a higher-level adjudicator within the agency of original jurisdiction.
The Secretary* shall approve each request for review under paragraph (1).
A request for higher-level review by the agency of original jurisdiction shall be—
in writing in such form as the Secretary may prescribe; and
made within one year of the notice* of the agency of original jurisdiction’s decision.
Such request may specifically indicate whether such review is requested by a higher-level adjudicator at the same office within the agency of original jurisdiction or by an adjudicator at a different office of the agency of original jurisdiction. The Secretary shall not deny such request for review by an adjudicator at a different office of the agency of original jurisdiction without good cause.
Notice of a higher-level review decision under this section shall be provided to the claimant (and any representative of such claimant) and shall include a general statement—
reflecting whether evidence was not considered pursuant to subsection (d); and
noting the options available to the claimant to have the evidence described in paragraph (1), if any, considered by the Department*.
The evidentiary record before the higher-level adjudicator shall be limited to the evidence of record in the agency of original jurisdiction decision being reviewed.
A review of the decision of the agency of original jurisdiction by a higher-level adjudicator within the agency of original jurisdiction shall be de novo.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 115–55, § 2(g)(1), Aug. 23, 2017, 131 Stat. 1107; amended Pub. L. 117–168, title VIII, § 807(a)(3), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1806.)
- 2017Enacted · Pub. L. 115-55 · 131 Stat. 1107
- 2022Amended · Pub. L. 117-168 · 136 Stat. 1806
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 115-55 on 2017-08-23.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case