ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

41 U.S.C. § 3304 — Use of noncompetitive procedures

submitted 15 years ago by Pub. L. 111-350 to r/title-41-PUBLIC-CONTRACTS · 1,567 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

An executive agency may use noncompetitive procurement only in the listed situations, such as one responsible source, unusual urgency, certain national-security needs, or a treaty requirement. The section also requires limits on urgent contracts, written justifications in most cases, public posting of those justifications, and requests to as many sources as practicable.

(a) When noncompetitive procedures may be used. An executive agency may use procedures other than competitive procedures only when:

(1) only one responsible source has the needed property or services and no other kind will meet the agency's needs;

(2) the need is unusually and compellingly urgent and the Government would be seriously harmed unless the agency limits the sources asked for bids or proposals;

(3) the contract must go to a particular source to (A) keep a facility, producer, manufacturer, or supplier available for a national emergency or industrial mobilization; (B) establish or maintain an essential engineering, research, or development capability at an educational or other nonprofit institution or a federally funded research and development center; (C) obtain an expert for litigation or a dispute involving, or reasonably expected to involve, the Government, whether or not the expert will testify; or (D) obtain an expert or neutral for any part of alternative dispute resolution or negotiated rulemaking, whether or not that person will testify;

(4) an international agreement or treaty, or written directions from a foreign government reimbursing the agency, requires noncompetitive procedures;

(5) subject to section 3105, a statute expressly authorizes or requires procurement through another executive agency or from a named source, or the agency needs a brand-name commercial product for authorized resale;

(6) revealing the agency's needs would harm national security unless the number of sources is limited; or

(7) the agency head, without delegating this authority, finds noncompetitive procedures necessary in the public interest for that procurement and gives Congress written notice at least 30 days before award.

(b) Property or services deemed available from only one source. For (a)(1): (1) property or services for a contract based on accepting an unsolicited research proposal are treated as available from one source if the proposal shows a unique and innovative concept not otherwise available to the Government and not resembling a pending competitive procurement; and (2) property for a follow-on contract continuing development or production of a major system or highly specialized equipment may be treated as available only from the original source if using another source would likely substantially duplicate unrecoverable Government cost or cause an unacceptable delay.

(c) Property or services needed with unusual and compelling urgency. (1) A contract under (a)(2) may last only as long as needed to meet the unusual and compelling work requirements and for the agency to make a competitive contract for the needed goods or services. It may not last more than one year unless the agency head finds exceptional circumstances. (2) This subsection applies to a contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold.

(d) Offer requests to potential sources. For a procurement based on (a)(2) or (a)(6), the agency must request offers from as many potential sources as practicable in the circumstances.

(e) Justification for noncompetitive procedures. (1) Except under (3) and (4), the agency may not award a noncompetitive contract unless the contracting officer gives a written justification and certifies it is accurate and complete; the proper official approves it; and any required notice under section 1708 is published and the agency considers all bids or proposals received. Approval is by the competition advocate for over $500,000 through $10 million; by the head of the procuring activity or an authorized senior delegate for over $10 million through $50 million; and by the agency's senior procurement executive for over $50 million.

(2) The justification must describe the agency's needs; identify and explain the statutory exception; find that the expected cost is fair and reasonable; describe the market survey or explain why none was done; list written expressions of interest; and state steps the agency might take to remove a competition barrier before a later procurement.

(3) For a procurement under (a)(2), the justification and approval may be completed after award.

(4) They are not required when a statute requires procurement from a specified source; the need is a brand-name product for authorized resale; procurement is under (a)(7); or procurement is under chapter 85 of this title or section 8(a) of the Small Business Act.

(5)(A) An agency may never use noncompetitive procedures because of poor advance planning or concern about the amount available for procurement. It may not buy property or services from another executive agency unless that agency fully follows this division in procuring them. (B) The latter restriction adds to other legal restrictions.

(f) Public availability of justifications. (1)(A) Unless (B) applies, within 14 days after award the agency head must make public the documents containing the justification and approval required by (e)(1). (B) For a procurement under (a)(2), the period is 30 days. (2) The documents must be posted on the agency website and a Government-wide website selected by the Administrator. (3) Information exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) need not be made public.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)When Noncompetitive Procedures May Be Used.—

An executive agency may use procedures other than competitive procedures only when—

(1)

the property or services needed by the executive agency are available from only one responsible source and no other type of property or services will satisfy the needs of the executive agency;

(2)

the executive agency’s need for the property or services is of such an unusual and compelling urgency that the Federal Government would be seriously injured unless the executive agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits bids or proposals;

(3)

it is necessary to award the contract to a particular source—

(A)

to maintain a facility, producer, manufacturer, or other supplier available for furnishing property or services in case of a national emergency or to achieve industrial mobilization;

(B)

to establish or maintain an essential engineering, research, or development capability to be provided by an educational or other nonprofit institution or a Federally funded research and development center;

(C)

to procure the services of an expert for use, in any litigation or dispute (including any reasonably foreseeable litigation or dispute) involving the Federal Government, in any trial, hearing, or proceeding before a court, administrative tribunal, or agency, whether or not the expert is expected to testify; or

(D)

to procure the services of an expert or neutral for use in any part of an alternative dispute resolution or negotiated rulemaking process, whether or not the expert is expected to testify;

(4)

the terms of an international agreement or treaty between the Federal Government and a foreign government or an international organization, or the written directions of a foreign government reimbursing the executive agency for the cost of the procurement of the property or services for that government, have the effect of requiring the use of procedures other than competitive procedures;

(5)

subject to section 3105 of this title, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the procurement be made through another executive agency or from a specified source, or the agency’s need is for a brand-name commercial product for authorized resale;

(6)

the disclosure of the executive agency’s needs would compromise the national security unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits bids or proposals; or

(7)

the head of the executive agency (who may not delegate the authority under this paragraph)—

(A)

determines that it is necessary in the public interest to use procedures other than competitive procedures in the particular procurement concerned; and

(B)

notifies Congress in writing of that determination not less than 30 days before the award of the contract.

(b)Property or Services Deemed Available From Only One Source.—

For the purposes of subsection (a)(1), in the case of—

(1)

a contract for property or services to be awarded on the basis of acceptance of an unsolicited research proposal, the property or services are deemed to be available from only one source if the source has submitted an unsolicited research proposal that demonstrates a unique and innovative concept, the substance of which is not otherwise available to the Federal Government and does not resemble the substance of a pending competitive procurement; or

(2)

a follow-on contract for the continued development or production of a major system or highly specialized equipment, the property may be deemed to be available only from the original source and may be procured through procedures other than competitive procedures when it is likely that award to a source other than the original source would result in—

(A)

substantial duplication of cost to the Federal Government that is not expected to be recovered through competition; or

(B)

unacceptable delay in fulfilling the executive agency’s needs.

(c)Property or Services Needed With Unusual and Compelling Urgency.—
(1)Allowable contract period.—

The contract period of a contract described in paragraph (2) that is entered into by an executive agency pursuant to the authority provided under subsection (a)(2)—

(A)

may not exceed the time necessary—

(i)

to meet the unusual and compelling requirements of the work to be performed under the contract; and

(ii)

for the executive agency to enter into another contract for the required goods or services through the use of competitive procedures; and

(B)

may not exceed one year unless the head of the executive agency entering into the contract determines that exceptional circumstances apply.

(2)Applicability of allowable contract period.—

This subsection applies to any contract in an amount greater than the simplified acquisition threshold.

(d)Offer Requests to Potential Sources.—

An executive agency using procedures other than competitive procedures to procure property or services by reason of the application of paragraph (2) or (6) of subsection (a) shall request offers from as many potential sources as is practicable under the circumstances.

(e)Justification for Use of Noncompetitive Procedures.—
(1)Prerequisites for awarding contract.—

Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), an executive agency may not award a contract using procedures other than competitive procedures unless—

(A)

the contracting officer for the contract justifies the use of those procedures in writing and certifies the accuracy and completeness of the justification;

(B)

the justification is approved, in the case of a contract for an amount—

(i)

exceeding $500,000 but equal to or less than $10,000,000, by the advocate for competition for the procuring activity (without further delegation) or by an official referred to in clause (ii) or (iii);

(ii)

exceeding $10,000,000 but equal to or less than $50,000,000, by the head of the procuring activity or by a delegate who, if a member of the armed forces, is a general or flag officer or, if a civilian, is serving in a position in which the individual is entitled to receive the daily equivalent of the maximum annual rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule (or in a comparable or higher position under another schedule); or

(iii)

exceeding $50,000,000, by the senior procurement executive of the agency designated pursuant to section 1702(c) of this title (without further delegation); and

(C)

any required notice has been published with respect to the contract pursuant to section 1708 of this title and the executive agency has considered all bids or proposals received in response to that notice.

(2)Elements of justification.—

The justification required by paragraph (1)(A) shall include—

(A)

a description of the agency’s needs;

(B)

an identification of the statutory exception from the requirement to use competitive procedures and a demonstration, based on the proposed contractor’s qualifications or the nature of the procurement, of the reasons for using that exception;

(C)

a determination that the anticipated cost will be fair and reasonable;

(D)

a description of the market survey conducted or a statement of the reasons a market survey was not conducted;

(E)

a listing of any sources that expressed in writing an interest in the procurement; and

(F)

a statement of any actions the agency may take to remove or overcome a barrier to competition before a subsequent procurement for those needs.

(3)Justification allowed after contract awarded.—

In the case of a procurement permitted by subsection (a)(2), the justification and approval required by paragraph (1) may be made after the contract is awarded.

(4)Justification not required.—

The justification and approval required by paragraph (1) are not required if—

(A)

a statute expressly requires that the procurement be made from a specified source;

(B)

the agency’s need is for a brand-name commercial product for authorized resale;

(C)

the procurement is permitted by subsection (a)(7); or

(D)

the procurement is conducted under chapter 85 of this title or section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)).

(5)Restrictions on executive agencies.—
(A)Contracts and procurement of property or services.—

In no case may an executive agency—

(i)

enter into a contract for property or services using procedures other than competitive procedures on the basis of the lack of advance planning or concerns related to the amount available to the agency for procurement functions; or

(ii)

procure property or services from another executive agency unless the other executive agency complies fully with the requirements of this division in its procurement of the property or services.

(B)Additional restriction.—

The restriction set out in subparagraph (A)(ii) is in addition to any other restriction provided by law.

(f)Public Availability of Justification and Approval Required for Using Noncompetitive Procedures.—
(1)Time requirement.—
(A)Within 14 days after contract award.—

Except as provided in subparagraph (B), in the case of a procurement permitted by subsection (a), the head of an executive agency shall make publicly available, within 14 days after the award of the contract, the documents containing the justification and approval required by subsection (e)(1) with respect to the procurement.

(B)Within 30 days after contract award.—

In the case of a procurement permitted by subsection (a)(2), subparagraph (A) shall be applied by substituting “30 days” for “14 days”.

(2)Availability on websites.—

The documents referred to in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) shall be made available on the website of the agency and through a Government-wide website selected by the Administrator.

(3)Exception to availability and approval requirement.—

This subsection does not require the public availability of information that is exempt from public disclosure under section 552(b) of title 5.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 111–350, § 3, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3748; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 836(b)(7), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1861.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2011Enacted · Pub. L. 111-350 · 124 Stat. 3748
  • 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-232 · 132 Stat. 1861

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 111-350 on 2011-01-04.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case