ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 12744Income targeting

submitted 36 years ago by Pub. L. 101-625 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 274 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Most rental assistance must go to families earning no more than 60% of area median income. All homeownership funds must go to families at or below 100% of that median. Every dollar must fund housing that meets section 12745's affordability rules.

(1) Rental assistance and rental units: (A) at least 90 percent of the families getting rental assistance — or of the dwelling units funded — must be occupied by families whose income does not exceed 60 percent of the area's median family income (adjusted for family size), measured at occupancy or when the funds are invested, whichever is later. The Secretary may set this ceiling higher or lower than 60 percent if construction costs, fair market rents, or unusually high or low incomes justify it. (B) The rest of the families or units must qualify as "low-income" — meaning income above the 60 percent line but still within the low-income definition — at occupancy or investment, whichever is later. (2) Homeownership assistance: 100 percent of the funds used for homeownership assistance must go toward dwelling units occupied by families whose household income does not exceed 100 percent of the area's median family income, as the Secretary determines. (3) All investments — rental or homeownership — must go toward housing that qualifies as "affordable housing" under section 12745.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Each participating jurisdiction shall invest funds made available under this part within each fiscal year so that—

(1)

with respect to rental assistance and rental units—

(A)

not less than 90 percent of (i) the families receiving such rental assistance are families whose incomes do not exceed 60 percent of the median family income for the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families, (except that the Secretary may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 60 percent of the median for the area on the basis of the Secretary’s findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of construction cost or fair market rent, or unusually high or low family income) at the time of occupancy or at the time funds are invested, whichever is later, or (ii) the dwelling units assisted with such funds are occupied by families having such incomes; and

(B)

the remainder of (i) the families receiving such rental assistance are households that qualify as low-income families (other than families described in subparagraph (A)) at the time of occupancy or at the time funds are invested, whichever is later, or (ii) the dwelling units assisted with such funds are occupied by such households;

(2)

with respect to homeownership assistance, 100 percent of such funds are invested with respect to dwelling units that are occupied by families with a household income that does not exceed 100 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary; and

(3)

all such funds are invested with respect to housing that qualifies as affordable housing under section 12745 of this title.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 101–625, title II, § 214, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4101; Pub. L. 103–233, title II, § 202, Apr. 11, 1994, 108 Stat. 364; Pub. L. 105–276, title V, § 599B(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2660; Pub. L. 119–101, title V, § 501(c)(1), July 11, 2026, 140 Stat. 907.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1990Enacted · Pub. L. 101-625 · 104 Stat. 4101
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-233 · 108 Stat. 364
  • 1998Amended · Pub. L. 105-276 · 112 Stat. 2660
  • 2026Amended · Pub. L. 119-101 · 140 Stat. 907

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 101-625 on 1990-11-28.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case