ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 14922Process for accreditation and approval; role of accrediting entities

submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-279 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 663 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of State contracts with qualified nonprofit or state organizations to accredit adoption agencies and approve individuals for Convention adoptions. These accrediting entities oversee, enforce rules against, and report on the agencies and people they accredit. Agencies penalized can fix problems and reapply, or challenge the action in federal court, and accreditation fees are capped at actual cost.

(a) Designation of accrediting entities. (1) In general. The Secretary must enter into agreements with one or more qualified entities to perform the duties in subsection (b), following the Convention, this subchapter, and the regulations under section 14923. Once an agreement is signed, the Secretary designates that entity an "accrediting entity." (2) Qualified entities. A qualified entity is either (A) a nonprofit private entity with expertise developing and running standards for child-welfare-service providers, meeting whatever other criteria the Secretary sets by regulation; or (B) a public entity, other than a federal one — such as a state agency that licenses adoption agencies — that (i) has that same expertise, (ii) accredits only agencies in its own state, and (iii) meets the Secretary's other criteria. (b) Duties of accrediting entities. (1) Accreditation and approval — accrediting agencies and approving individuals to provide adoption services in Convention cases. (2) Oversight — ongoing monitoring of accredited agencies' and approved persons' compliance, including reviewing complaints, under procedures the Secretary approves. (3) Enforcement — taking adverse action against agencies or people who don't comply — requiring corrective action, imposing sanctions, or refusing to renew, suspending, or canceling accreditation or approval — and telling them what deficiencies led to the action. (4) Data, records, and reports — collecting data, keeping records, and reporting to the Secretary, the U.S. central authority, state courts, and others, including who was granted or denied accreditation or approval, as the Secretary requires. (5) Report on use of Federal funding — within 90 days of receiving funding under section 14943, the entity must report to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Foreign Affairs Committee (A) how much funding it received, and (B) how the funding was, or will be, used. (c) Remedies for adverse action by accrediting entity. (1) Correction of deficiency — an agency or person hit with an adverse action may reapply for accreditation or approval, or ask that the action be ended, once they show the accrediting entity that the underlying problems are fixed. (2) No other administrative review — an adverse action by an accrediting entity is not subject to any other administrative appeal. (3) Judicial review — the agency or person may petition the U.S. district court where the agency is located or the person lives to set the action aside. The court reviews it under section 706 of Title 5, and for that review the accrediting entity counts as a government "agency" under section 701 of Title 5. (d) Fees. The Secretary must approve the fees accrediting entities charge for accreditation costs, and those fees can't exceed the actual cost of accrediting. When reviewing fee levels, the Secretary must consider the size, location, and number of Convention adoption cases handled by the agencies or people being accredited.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Designation of accrediting entities
(1) In general

The Secretary shall enter into agreements with one or more qualified entities under which such entities will perform the duties described in subsection (b) in accordance with the Convention, this subchapter, and the regulations prescribed under section 14923 of this title, and upon entering into each such agreement shall designate the qualified entity as an accrediting entity.

(2) Qualified entities

In paragraph (1), the term “qualified entity” means—

(A)

a nonprofit private entity that has expertise in developing and administering standards for entities providing child welfare services and that meets such other criteria as the Secretary may by regulation establish; or

(B)

a public entity (other than a Federal entity), including an agency or instrumentality of State government having responsibility for licensing adoption agencies, that—

(i)

has expertise in developing and administering standards for entities providing child welfare services;

(ii)

accredits only agencies located in the State in which the public entity is located; and

(iii)

meets such other criteria as the Secretary may by regulation establish.

(b) Duties of accrediting entities

The duties described in this subsection are the following:

(1) Accreditation and approval

Accreditation of agencies, and approval of persons, to provide adoption services in the United States in cases subject to the Convention.

(2) Oversight

Ongoing monitoring of the compliance of accredited agencies and approved persons with applicable requirements, including review of complaints against such agencies and persons in accordance with procedures established by the accrediting entity and approved by the Secretary.

(3) Enforcement

Taking of adverse actions (including requiring corrective action, imposing sanctions, and refusing to renew, suspending, or canceling accreditation or approval) for noncompliance with applicable requirements, and notifying the agency or person against whom adverse actions are taken of the deficiencies necessitating the adverse action.

(4) Data, records, and reports

Collection of data, maintenance of records, and reporting to the Secretary, the United States central authority, State courts, and other entities (including on persons and agencies granted or denied approval or accreditation), to the extent and in the manner that the Secretary requires.

(5) Report on use of Federal funding

Not later than 90 days after an accrediting entity receives Federal funding authorized by section 14943 of this title, the entity shall submit a report to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that describes—

(A)

the amount of such funding the entity received; and

(B)

how such funding was, or will be, used by the entity.

(c) Remedies for adverse action by accrediting entity
(1) Correction of deficiency

An agency or person who is the subject of an adverse action by an accrediting entity may re-apply for accreditation or approval (or petition for termination of the adverse action) on demonstrating to the satisfaction of the accrediting entity that the deficiencies necessitating the adverse action have been corrected.

(2) No other administrative review

An adverse action by an accrediting entity shall not be subject to administrative review.

(3) Judicial review

An agency or person who is the subject of an adverse action by an accrediting entity may petition the United States district court in the judicial district in which the agency is located or the person resides to set aside the adverse action. The court shall review the adverse action in accordance with section 706 of title 5, and for purposes of such review the accrediting entity shall be considered an agency within the meaning of section 701 of such title.

(d) Fees

The amount of fees assessed by accrediting entities for the costs of accreditation shall be subject to approval by the Secretary. Such fees may not exceed the costs of accreditation. In reviewing the level of such fees, the Secretary shall consider the relative size of, the geographic location of, and the number of Convention adoption cases managed by the agencies or persons subject to accreditation or approval by the accrediting entity.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–279, title II, § 202, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 831; Pub. L. 112–276, § 3(b), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2467.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-279 · 114 Stat. 831
  • 2013Amended · Pub. L. 112-276 · 126 Stat. 2467

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-279 on 2000-10-06.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case