ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 16319Energy and water supplies

submitted 21 years ago by Pub. L. 109-58 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 234 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Energy must research how energy and water supply issues affect each other — covering arsenic treatment, desalination, and supply-and-demand modeling — and assess how well existing federal programs address them. The Secretary must consult other agencies, may build new facilities, must set up an advisory committee, and had to report to Congress by 2007.

(a) In general: The Secretary must carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application to: (1) address energy-related issues tied to having adequate water supplies and managing and using water efficiently; (2) address water-related issues tied to having adequate energy supplies and managing and using energy efficiently; and (3) assess how effective existing Department and other federal programs are at addressing these energy-and-water issues. (b) Program elements: The program must include: (1) arsenic treatment; (2) desalination; and (3) planning, analysis, and modeling of energy and water supply and demand. (c) Collaboration: The Secretary must consult with the EPA Administrator, the Secretary of the Interior, the Chief Engineer of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, and other federal agencies as appropriate. (d) Facilities: The Secretary may use all existing Department facilities and may design and build additional facilities as needed for this program. (e) Advisory committee: The Secretary must establish or use an advisory committee to give independent advice and review of the program. (f) Reports: Within 2 years of August 8, 2005, the Secretary had to report to Congress on the assessment described in subsection (b) — note this likely refers to the assessment in subsection (a)(3) — and recommend future actions.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Secretary shall carry out a program of research, development, demonstration, and commercial application to—

(1)

address energy-related issues associated with provision of adequate water supplies, optimal management, and efficient use of water;

(2)

address water-related issues associated with the provision of adequate supplies, optimal management, and efficient use of energy; and

(3)

assess the effectiveness of existing programs within the Department and other Federal agencies to address these energy and water related issues.

(b) Program elements

The program under this section shall include—

(1)

arsenic treatment;

(2)

desalination; and

(3)

planning, analysis, and modeling of energy and water supply and demand.

(c) Collaboration

In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Interior, the Chief Engineer of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, and other Federal agencies as appropriate.

(d) Facilities

The Secretary may utilize all existing facilities within the Department and may design and construct additional facilities as needed to carry out the purposes of this program.

(e) Advisory committee

The Secretary shall establish or utilize an advisory committee to provide independent advice and review of the program.

(f) Reports

Not later than 2 years after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the assessment described in subsection (b) and recommendations for future actions.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 109–58, title IX, § 979, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 905.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2005Enacted · Pub. L. 109-58 · 119 Stat. 905

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-58 on 2005-08-08.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case