ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

42 U.S.C. § 289Institutional review boards; ethics guidance program

submitted 82 years ago by Pub. L. 99-158 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 226 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Any group that applies for money to run biomedical or behavioral research on human subjects must promise the Secretary that it has set up an "Institutional Review Board" to review that research and protect the human subjects. The Secretary must also run a program that quickly and properly answers ethical questions about human-subject research, and must set up a process to respond promptly whenever anyone reports that a funded project has violated human subjects' rights.

(a) Institutional Review Boards required. The Secretary must, by regulation, require that any entity applying for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under this chapter, for a project or program involving biomedical or behavioral research on human subjects, submit assurances — satisfactory to the Secretary and following the Secretary's regulations — that it has set up a board known as an "Institutional Review Board." That Board's job is to review biomedical and behavioral research on human subjects that happens at, or is supported by, that entity, in order to protect the human subjects' rights. (b) Ethics guidance and reporting. The Secretary must set up a program within the Department of Health and Human Services to respond promptly and properly to requests for clarification or guidance on ethical issues that come up in biomedical or behavioral research on human subjects. The Secretary must also set up a process to respond promptly and properly whenever the Director of NIH gets information about violations of human subjects' rights in research funded under this chapter. That process must include ways to receive reports of such information from people who got funding under this chapter, and to take appropriate action about those violations.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The Secretary shall by regulation require that each entity which applies for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under this chapter for any project or program which involves the conduct of biomedical or behavioral research involving human subjects submit in or with its application for such grant, contract, or cooperative agreement assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that it has established (in accordance with regulations which the Secretary shall prescribe) a board (to be known as an “Institutional Review Board”) to review biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects conducted at or supported by such entity in order to protect the rights of the human subjects of such research.

(b)
(1)

The Secretary shall establish a program within the Department of Health and Human Services under which requests for clarification and guidance with respect to ethical issues raised in connection with biomedical or behavioral research involving human subjects are responded to promptly and appropriately.

(2)

The Secretary shall establish a process for the prompt and appropriate response to information provided to the Director of NIH respecting incidences of violations of the rights of human subjects of research for which funds have been made available under this chapter. The process shall include procedures for the receiving of reports of such information from recipients of funds under this chapter and taking appropriate action with respect to such violations.

Source credit: (July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, § 491, as added Pub. L. 99–158, § 2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 873.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1944Enacted · Pub. L. 99-158 · 99 Stat. 873

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-158 on 1944-07-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case