42 U.S.C. § 4852c — Guidelines for lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction activities
submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 102-550 to r/title-42-THE-PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND-WELFARE · 111 words · no verdicts yet
This section requires guidelines for lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction activities. It states the guideline requirement described in the supplied text.
no later than 12 months after October 28, 1992 , the Secretary*, in consultation with the Administrator* of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (acting through the Director* of the Centers for Disease Control), must issue guidelines for the conduct of federally supported work involving risk assessments, inspections, interim controls, and abatement* of lead-based paint hazards. Such guidelines is based upon criteria that measure the condition of the housing (and the presence of children under age 6 for the purposes of risk assessments) and must not be based upon criteria that measure the health of the residents of the housing.
Not later than 12 months after October 28, 1992, the Secretary*, in consultation with the Administrator* of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (acting through the Director* of the Centers for Disease Control), shall issue guidelines for the conduct of federally supported work involving risk assessments, inspections, interim controls, and abatement* of lead-based paint hazards. Such guidelines shall be based upon criteria that measure the condition of the housing (and the presence of children under age 6 for the purposes of risk assessments) and shall not be based upon criteria that measure the health of the residents of the housing.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–550, title X, § 1017, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3909.)
- 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 102-550 · 106 Stat. 3909
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-550 on 1992-10-28.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case