ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

43 U.S.C. § 3207Multi-benefit projects to improve watershed health

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 117-58 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 368 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section governs multi-benefit projects to improve watershed health. It sets the duties, permissions, limits, procedures, reports, or funding rules stated in the section.

(a) “Eligible applicant” means (1) a State, (2) a Tribal or local government, (3) an organization with power or water-delivery authority, (4) a regional authority, or (5) a nonprofit conservation organization. (b) Within 1 year after November 15, 2021, the Secretary, consulting relevant agency heads, must create a competitive grant program. The Secretary must award grants to eligible applicants to design, carry out, and monitor conservation results of habitat-restoration projects improving watershed health in a river basin adversely affected by a Bureau of Reclamation water project, by achieving one or more of: (1) ecosystem benefits; (2) native-species restoration; (3) protection of fish and wildlife habitat from climate-change effects; (4) invasive-species protection; (5) restoration of parts of the natural ecosystem; (6) improved commercial, recreational, subsistence, or Tribal ceremonial fishing; or (7) improved river recreation. (c) (1) In awarding a grant, the Secretary (A) must prioritize a project achieving more than one listed benefit and (B) may not fund a project whose purpose is meeting existing Federal or State environmental mitigation or compliance duties. (2) A funded project must comply with all applicable Federal and State laws. (d) The Federal share may not exceed (1) 50 percent of project cost, or (2) 75 percent when the project benefits ecological or recreational values and, as the Secretary determines, its nonconsumptive water-conservation or habitat-restoration benefit is at least 75 percent of project cost.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Definition of eligible applicant

In this section, the term “eligible applicant” means—

(1)

a State;

(2)

a Tribal or local government;

(3)

an organization with power or water delivery authority;

(4)

a regional authority; or

(5)

a nonprofit conservation organization.

(b) Establishment of competitive grant program

Not later than 1 year after November 15, 2021, the Secretary, in consultation with the heads of relevant agencies, shall establish a competitive grant program under which the Secretary shall award grants to eligible applicants for the design, implementation, and monitoring of conservation outcomes of habitat restoration projects that improve watershed health in a river basin that is adversely impacted by a Bureau of Reclamation water project by accomplishing 1 or more of the following:

(1)

Ecosystem benefits.

(2)

Restoration of native species.

(3)

Mitigation against the impacts of climate change to fish and wildlife habitats.

(4)

Protection against invasive species.

(5)

Restoration of aspects of the natural ecosystem.

(6)

Enhancement of commercial, recreational, subsistence, or Tribal ceremonial fishing.

(7)

Enhancement of river-based recreation.

(c) Requirements
(1) In general

In awarding a grant to an eligible applicant under subsection (b), the Secretary—

(A)

shall give priority to an eligible applicant that would carry out a habitat restoration project that achieves more than 1 of the benefits described in that subsection; and

(B)

may not provide a grant to carry out a habitat restoration project the purpose of which is to meet existing environmental mitigation or compliance obligations under Federal or State law.

(2) Compliance

A habitat restoration project awarded a grant under subsection (b) shall comply with all applicable Federal and State laws.

(d) Cost-sharing requirement

The Federal share of the cost of any habitat restoration project that is awarded a grant under subsection (b)—

(1)

shall not exceed 50 percent of the cost of the habitat restoration project; or

(2)

in the case of a habitat restoration project that provides benefits to ecological or recreational values in which the nonconsumptive water conservation benefit or habitat restoration benefit accounts for at least 75 percent of the cost of the habitat restoration project, as determined by the Secretary, shall not exceed 75 percent of the cost of the habitat restoration project.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title IX, § 40907, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1125.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 117-58 · 135 Stat. 1125

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 117-58 on 2021-11-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case