43 U.S.C. § 620e — Cost allocations; Indian lands; report to Congress
submitted 70 years ago by ch. 203 to r/title-43-PUBLIC-LANDS · 229 words · no verdicts yet
This section sets rules about cost allocations. It assigns duties, limits, procedures, or payments as described in the provisions below.
Upon completion of each unit, participating project or separable feature thereof, the Secretary shall allocate the total costs (excluding any expenditures authorized by section 620g of this title) of constructing said unit, project or feature to power, irrigation, municipal water supply, flood control, navigation, or any other purposes authorized under reclamation law. Allocations of construction, operation and maintenance costs to authorized nonreimbursable purposes shall be nonreturnable under the provisions of this chapter. In the event that the Navajo participating project is authorized, the costs allocated to irrigation of Indian-owned tribal or restricted lands within, under, or served by such project, and beyond the capability of such lands to repay, shall be determined, and, in recognition of the fact that assistance to the Navajo Indians is the responsibility of the entire nation, such costs shall be nonreimbursable. On January 1 of each year the Secretary shall report to the Congress for the previous fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year 1957, upon the status of the revenues from, and the cost of, constructing, operating, and maintaining the Colorado River storage project and the participating projects. The Secretary’s report shall be prepared to reflect accurately the Federal investment allocated at that time to power, to irrigation, and to other purposes, the progress of return and repayment thereon, and the estimated rate of progress, year by year, in accomplishing full repayment.
Source credit: (Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, § 6, 70 Stat. 109.)
- 1956Enacted · Act of Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203 · 70 Stat. 109
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 203 on 1956-04-11.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case