ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 13709Procedures for resolving claims involving unfiled, negotiated transportation rates

submitted 31 years ago by Pub. L. 104-88 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 1,330 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law lets shippers settle disputes when a carrier tries to collect more money than it originally billed, based on rates that were never properly filed. Shippers can pay a reduced percentage of the difference instead of the full amount, based on shipment weight or type.

(a) Transportation Provided at Rates Other Than Legal Tariff Rates. (1) In general: When a motor carrier moving property (other than a household goods carrier), a freight forwarder (other than a household goods freight forwarder), or someone representing them claims more money on top of what was originally billed and collected, the person being billed can choose to settle the claim under (b), (c), or (d) — but only after showing that: (A) the carrier or freight forwarder has stopped transporting property, or is transporting it just to dodge this section; and (B) regarding the claim: (i) the carrier or freight forwarder offered a rate different from what was legally on file with the Board or Interstate Commerce Commission at the time; (ii) the person shipped goods relying reasonably on that offered rate; (iii) the carrier or freight forwarder never properly or timely filed a tariff for that rate, or never made a contract-carriage agreement; (iv) that offered rate was actually billed and collected; and (v) the carrier or freight forwarder is now demanding more money based on a higher rate that was on file. (2) Forum: A dispute about the showing in (1)(A) is decided by the court where the claim was filed. A dispute about the showing in (1)(B) is decided by the Board. While either dispute is pending, the person doesn't have to pay the carrier or freight forwarder anything more. (3) Effect of satisfaction of claims: Once a claim is settled under (b), (c), or (d), that settlement binds both sides, and they're not subject to chapter 119 of this title, as it stood on December 31, 1995, or chapter 149. (b) Claims Involving Shipments Weighing 10,000 Pounds or Less: A person facing this kind of claim on shipments each weighing 10,000 pounds or less may settle by paying 20% of the difference between the carrier's real tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid. If there's a dispute about which rate legally applied, the Board decides it. (c) Claims Involving Shipments Weighing More Than 10,000 Pounds: Same idea, but for shipments over 10,000 pounds, the settlement percentage is 15% instead of 20%. Disputes about the applicable rate again go to the Board. (d) Claims Involving Public Warehousemen: Regardless of (b) and (c), a public warehouseman facing this kind of claim may settle by paying just 5% of the difference. Rate disputes here also go to the Board. (e) Effects of Election: If someone doesn't choose to settle under (b), (c), or (d), they can pursue whatever other rights and remedies exist under this part — or, for transportation before January 1, 1996, whatever rights existed under this title as of December 31, 1995. (f) Stay of Additional Compensation: If someone challenges the reasonableness of a rate under this section, they don't have to pay the carrier or freight forwarder any more money until the Board decides whether the challenged rate was reasonable. (g) Notification of Election. (1) General rule: A person must tell the carrier or freight forwarder which option — (b), (c), or (d) — they're choosing. Except as (2), (3), and (4) say, they can choose anytime. (2) Demands for payment initially made after December 3, 1993: If the carrier first demanded extra payment after December 3, 1993, and told the person about subsections (a) through (f) at that time, the person must choose by the later of: (A) 60 days after answering a lawsuit to collect the extra charges; or (B) March 5, 1994. (3) Pending suits for collection made before December 4, 1993: If the carrier already sued to collect before December 4, 1993, and then told the person about (a) through (f), the person must choose within 90 days after getting that notice. (4) Demands for payment made before December 4, 1993: If the carrier demanded payment before December 4, 1993 but hadn't sued yet, and then told the person about (a) through (f), the person must choose by the later of: (A) 60 days after answering a collection lawsuit; or (B) March 5, 1994. (h) Claims Involving Small-Business Concerns, Charitable Organizations, and Recyclable Materials. (1) In general: Despite (b), (c), and (d), a person doesn't owe any of the difference at all if: (A) the person qualifies as a small business under the Small Business Act; (B) the person is a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; or (C) the cargo involved is recyclable materials. (2) Recyclable materials defined: "Recyclable materials" here means waste products meant for recycling or reuse as part of a recognized pollution-control program.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Transportation Provided at Rates Other Than Legal Tariff Rates.—
(1)In general.—

When a claim is made by a motor carrier of property (other than a household goods carrier) providing transportation subject to jurisdiction under subchapter II of chapter 105 (as in effect on December 31, 1995) or subchapter I of chapter 135, by a freight forwarder (other than a household goods freight forwarder), or by a party representing such a carrier or freight forwarder regarding the collection of rates or charges for such transportation in addition to those originally billed and collected by the carrier or freight forwarder for such transportation, the person against whom the claim is made may elect to satisfy the claim under the provisions of subsection (b), (c), or (d), upon showing that—

(A)

the carrier or freight forwarder is no longer transporting property or is transporting property for the purpose of avoiding the application of this section; and

(B)

with respect to the claim—

(i)

the person was offered a transportation rate by the carrier or freight forwarder other than that legally on file at the time with the Board or with the Interstate Commerce Commission, as required, for the transportation service;

(ii)

the person tendered freight to the carrier or freight forwarder in reasonable reliance upon the offered transportation rate;

(iii)

the carrier or freight forwarder did not properly or timely file with the Board or with the Interstate Commerce Commission, as required, a tariff providing for such transportation rate or failed to enter into an agreement for contract carriage;

(iv)

such transportation rate was billed and collected by the carrier or freight forwarder; and

(v)

the carrier or freight forwarder demands additional payment of a higher rate filed in a tariff.

(2)Forum.—

If there is a dispute as to the showing under paragraph (1)(A), such dispute shall be resolved by the court in which the claim is brought. If there is a dispute as to the showing under paragraph (1)(B), such dispute shall be resolved by the Board. Pending the resolution of any such dispute, the person shall not have to pay any additional compensation to the carrier or freight forwarder.

(3)Effect of satisfaction of claims.—

Satisfaction of the claim under subsection (b), (c), or (d) shall be binding on the parties, and the parties shall not be subject to chapter 119 of this title, as such chapter was in effect on December 31, 1995, or chapter 149.

(b)Claims Involving Shipments Weighing 10,000 Pounds or Less.—

A person from whom the additional legally applicable and effective tariff rate or charges are sought may elect to satisfy the claim if the shipments each weighed 10,000 pounds or less, by payment of 20 percent of the difference between the carrier’s applicable and effective tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid. In the event that a dispute arises as to the rate that was legally applicable to the shipment, such dispute shall be resolved by the Board.

(c)Claims Involving Shipments Weighing More Than 10,000 Pounds.—

A person from whom the additional legally applicable and effective tariff rate or charges are sought may elect to satisfy the claim if the shipments each weighed more than 10,000 pounds, by payment of 15 percent of the difference between the carrier’s applicable and effective tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid. In the event that a dispute arises as to the rate that was legally applicable to the shipment, such dispute shall be resolved by the Board.

(d)Claims Involving Public Warehousemen.—

Notwithstanding subsections (b) and (c), a person from whom the additional legally applicable and effective tariff rate or charges are sought may elect to satisfy the claim by payment of 5 percent of the difference between the carrier’s applicable and effective tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid if such person is a public warehouseman. In the event that a dispute arises as to the rate that was legally applicable to the shipment, such dispute shall be resolved by the Board.

(e)Effects of Election.—

When a person from whom additional legally applicable freight rates or charges are sought does not elect to use the provisions of subsection (b), (c) or (d), the person may pursue all rights and remedies existing under this part or, for transportation provided before January 1, 1996, all rights and remedies that existed under this title on December 31, 1995.

(f)Stay of Additional Compensation.—

When a person proceeds under this section to challenge the reasonableness of the legally applicable freight rate or charges being claimed by a carrier or freight forwarder in addition to those already billed and collected, the person shall not have to pay any additional compensation to the carrier or freight forwarder until the Board has made a determination as to the reasonableness of the challenged rate as applied to the freight of the person against whom the claim is made.

(g)Notification of Election.—
(1)General rule.—

A person must notify the carrier or freight forwarder as to its election to proceed under subsection (b), (c), or (d). Except as provided in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), such election may be made at any time.

(2)Demands for payment initially made after december 3, 1993.—

If the carrier or freight forwarder or party representing such carrier or freight forwarder initially demands the payment of additional freight charges after December 3, 1993, and notifies the person from whom additional freight charges are sought of the provisions of subsections (a) through (f) at the time of the making of such initial demand, the election must be made not later than the later of—

(A)

the 60th day following the filing of an answer to a suit for the collection of such additional legally applicable freight rate or charges, or

(B)

March 5, 1994.

(3)Pending suits for collection made before december 4, 1993.—

If the carrier or freight forwarder or party representing such carrier or freight forwarder has filed, before December 4, 1993, a suit for the collection of additional freight charges and notifies the person from whom additional freight charges are sought of the provisions of subsections (a) through (f), the election must be made not later than the 90th day following the date on which such notification is received.

(4)Demands for payment made before december 4, 1993.—

If the carrier or freight forwarder or party representing such carrier or freight forwarder has demanded the payment of additional freight charges, and has not filed a suit for the collection of such additional freight charges, before December 4, 1993, and notifies the person from whom additional freight charges are sought of the provisions of subsections (a) through (f), the election must be made not later than the later of—

(A)

the 60th day following the filing of an answer to a suit for the collection of such additional legally applicable freight rate or charges, or

(B)

March 5, 1994.

(h)Claims Involving Small-Business Concerns, Charitable Organizations, and Re­cyclable Materials.—
(1)In general.—

Notwithstanding subsections (b), (c), and (d), a person from whom the additional legally applicable and effective tariff rate or charges are sought shall not be liable for the difference between the carrier’s applicable and effective tariff rate and the rate originally billed and paid—

(A)

if such person qualifies as a small-business concern under the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.),

(B)

if such person is an organization which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, or

(C)

if the cargo involved in the claim is recyclable materials.

(2)Recyclable materials defined.—

In this subsection, the term “recyclable materials” means waste products for recycling or reuse in the furtherance of recognized pollution control programs.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 104–88, title I, § 103, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 874; amended Pub. L. 104–287, § 5(29), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3391.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1995Enacted · Pub. L. 104-88 · 109 Stat. 874
  • 1996Amended · Pub. L. 104-287 · 110 Stat. 3391

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-88 on 1995-12-29.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case