ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 303 — Policy on lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites

submitted 43 years ago by Pub. L. 97-449 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 1,424 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law protects parks, wildlife refuges, and historic sites from transportation projects. The Secretary can only approve using this land if there's no reasonable alternative. Special rules let the Secretary skip full review when a project's impact is minor.

(a) It is U.S. policy to make a special effort to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside, public parks and recreation land, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites.

(b) The Secretary of Transportation must work with the Secretaries of the Interior, Housing and Urban Development, and Agriculture, and with the states, to build measures into transportation plans and programs that maintain or improve natural beauty where transportation crosses the land.

(c) Approval of Programs and Projects. Except for park roads or parkways under 23 U.S.C. § 204, and subject to subsections (d) and (h), the Secretary may only approve a transportation program or project that uses publicly owned land from a nationally, state-, or locally significant park, recreation area, wildlife or waterfowl refuge, or historic site if (1) there's no prudent, feasible alternative to using that land, and (2) the project includes all possible planning to minimize the harm it causes.

(d) De Minimis Impacts. (1) These requirements count as satisfied if the Secretary finds, following this subsection, that a project's impact on the site is minimal — for historic sites, this satisfies the whole section; for parks, recreation areas, and refuges, it satisfies the no-alternative test in (c)(1) and drops the alternatives analysis otherwise required by (c)(2). In making that finding, the Secretary must count any measures required to avoid, minimize, mitigate, or offset harm as part of the project itself. (2) For historic sites, the Secretary can find minimal impact only if (A) consultation under 54 U.S.C. § 306108 shows the project will have no adverse effect, or that no historic properties are affected; (B) the state or tribal historic preservation officer agrees in writing (and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation too, if it's part of the consultation); and (C) the finding was developed together with the parties in that consultation. (3) For parks, recreation areas, and refuges, the Secretary can find minimal impact only if (A) after public notice and a chance for public comment, the Secretary decides the project won't hurt the protected features of the site, and (B) the officials in charge of that site agree.

(e) Satisfaction of Requirements for Certain Historic Sites. (1) The Secretary must align this section's requirements with the National Environmental Policy Act and 54 U.S.C. § 306108 as closely as practical, and within 90 days of this subsection's enactment must work with the Interior Secretary and the Advisory Council's Executive Director to set up procedures for that alignment. (2) If, during a National Environmental Policy Act review, the Secretary finds no feasible or prudent alternative to using a historic site, the Secretary may include that finding in the review, notify the relevant preservation officers, the Council (if involved), and the Interior Secretary, and ask them to agree the finding is enough to satisfy (c)(1); if they all agree, no further (c)(1) analysis is needed, and the finding and agreements must go in the decision record and be posted online within 3 days of getting all the agreements. (3) If the Secretary and those same officials agree no feasible or prudent alternative exists, the Secretary may notify them of an intent to satisfy (c)(2) through the section 306108 consultation process instead; to do that, those officials must agree, in the resulting memorandum or programmatic agreement, on how the historic site will be treated.

(f) References to Past Transportation Environmental Authorities. (1) This section's requirements are commonly called "section 4(f) requirements," after the old Department of Transportation Act provision. (2) The section 306108 requirements are commonly called "section 106 requirements," after the old National Historic Preservation Act provision.

(g) Bridge Exemption From Consideration. A common concrete or steel bridge or culvert built after 1945 that is exempt from individual review under section 306108 is also exempt from review under this section.

(h) Rail and Transit. (1) Improving, maintaining, rehabilitating, or operating a railroad or rail transit line that is or was used to carry goods or passengers does not count as "using" a historic site under subsection (c), even if the line is (or could be) listed on the National Register of Historic Places. (2) Exceptions: (A) that protection does not cover stations, or bridges and tunnels on abandoned railroad lines or transit lines no longer in use. (B) But those excepted bridges and tunnels do not include ones on lines where service was merely discontinued, or that were railbanked or otherwise kept in reserve for future transportation use.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

It is the policy of the United States Government that special effort should be made to preserve the natural beauty of the countryside and public park and recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and historic sites.

(b)

The Secretary of Transportation shall cooperate and consult with the Secretaries of the Interior, Housing and Urban Development, and Agriculture, and with the States, in developing transportation plans and programs that include measures to maintain or enhance the natural beauty of lands crossed by transportation activities or facilities.

(c)Approval of Programs and Projects.—

Subject to subsections (d) and (h), the Secretary may approve a transportation program or project (other than any project for a park road or parkway under section 204 1 of title 23) requiring the use of publicly owned land of a public park, recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge of national, State, or local significance, or land of an historic site of national, State, or local significance (as determined by the Federal, State, or local officials having jurisdiction over the park, area, refuge, or site) only if—

(1)

there is no prudent and feasible alternative to using that land; and

(2)

the program or project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the park, recreation area, wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or historic site resulting from the use.

(d)De Minimis Impacts.—
(1)Requirements.—
(A)Requirements for historic sites.—

The requirements of this section shall be considered to be satisfied with respect to an area described in paragraph (2) if the Secretary determines, in accordance with this subsection, that a transportation program or project will have a de minimis impact on the area.

(B)Requirements for parks, recreation areas, and wildlife or waterfowl refuges.—

The requirements of subsection (c)(1) shall be considered to be satisfied with respect to an area described in paragraph (3) if the Secretary determines, in accordance with this subsection, that a transportation program or project will have a de minimis impact on the area. The requirements of subsection (c)(2) with respect to an area described in paragraph (3) shall not include an alternatives analysis.

(C)Criteria.—

In making any determination under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider to be part of a transportation program or project any avoidance, minimization, mitigation, or enhancement measures that are required to be implemented as a condition of approval of the transportation program or project.

(2)Historic sites.—

With respect to historic sites, the Secretary may make a finding of de minimis impact only if—

(A)

the Secretary has determined, in accordance with the consultation process required under section 306108 of title 54, United States Code,2 that—

(i)

the transportation program or project will have no adverse effect on the historic site; or

(ii)

there will be no historic properties affected by the transportation program or project;

(B)

the finding of the Secretary has received written concurrence from the applicable State historic preservation officer or tribal historic preservation officer (and from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation if the Council is participating in the consultation process); and

(C)

the finding of the Secretary has been developed in consultation with parties consulting as part of the process referred to in subparagraph (A).

(3)Parks, recreation areas, and wildlife or waterfowl refuges.—

With respect to parks, recreation areas, or wildlife or waterfowl refuges, the Secretary may make a finding of de minimis impact only if—

(A)

the Secretary has determined, after public notice and opportunity for public review and comment, that the transportation program or project will not adversely affect the activities, features, and attributes of the park, recreation area, or wildlife or waterfowl refuge eligible for protection under this section; and

(B)

the finding of the Secretary has received concurrence from the officials with jurisdiction over the park, recreation area, or wildlife or waterfowl refuge.

(e)Satisfaction of Requirements for Certain Historic Sites.—
(1)In general.—

The Secretary shall—

(A)

align, to the maximum extent practicable, the requirements of this section with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and section 306108 of title 54, including implementing regulations; and

(B)

not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, coordinate with the Secretary of the Interior and the Executive Director of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (referred to in this subsection as the “Council”) to establish procedures to satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A) (including regulations).

(2)Avoidance alternative analysis.—
(A)In general.—

If, in an analysis required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Secretary determines that there is no feasible or prudent alternative to avoid use of a historic site, the Secretary may—

(i)

include the determination of the Secretary in the analysis required under that Act;

(ii)

provide a notice of the determination to—

(I)

each applicable State historic preservation officer and tribal historic preservation officer;

(II)

the Council, if the Council is participating in the consultation process under section 306108 of title 54; and

(III)

the Secretary of the Interior; and

(iii)

request from the applicable preservation officer, the Council, and the Secretary of the Interior a concurrence that the determination is sufficient to satisfy subsection (c)(1).

(B)Concurrence.—

If the applicable preservation officer, the Council, and the Secretary of the Interior each provide a concurrence requested under subparagraph (A)(iii), no further analysis under subsection (c)(1) shall be required.

(C)Publication.—

A notice of a determination, together with each relevant concurrence to that determination, under subparagraph (A) shall—

(i)

be included in the record of decision or finding of no significant impact of the Secretary; and

(ii)

be posted on an appropriate Federal website by not later than 3 days after the date of receipt by the Secretary of all concurrences requested under subparagraph (A)(iii).

(3)Aligning historical reviews.—
(A)In general.—

If the Secretary, the applicable preservation officer, the Council, and the Secretary of the Interior concur that no feasible and prudent alternative exists as described in paragraph (2), the Secretary may provide to the applicable preservation officer, the Council, and the Secretary of the Interior notice of the intent of the Secretary to satisfy subsection (c)(2) through the consultation requirements of section 306108 of title 54.

(B)Satisfaction of conditions.—

To satisfy subsection (c)(2), the applicable preservation officer, the Council, and the Secretary of the Interior shall concur in the treatment of the applicable historic site described in the memorandum of agreement or programmatic agreement developed under section 306108 of title 54.

(f)References to Past Transportation Environmental Authorities.—
(1)Section 4(f) requirements.—

The requirements of this section are commonly referred to as section 4(f) requirements (see section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (Public Law 89–670; 80 Stat. 934) as in effect before the repeal of that section).

(2)Section 106 requirements.—

The requirements of section 306108 of title 54 are commonly referred to as section 106 requirements (see section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89–665; 80 Stat. 917) as in effect before the repeal of that section).

(g)Bridge Exemption From Consideration.—

A common post-1945 concrete or steel bridge or culvert (as described in 77 Fed. Reg. 68790) that is exempt from individual review under section 306108 of title 54 shall be exempt from consideration under this section.

(h)Rail and Transit.—
(1)In general.—

Improvements to, or the maintenance, rehabilitation, or operation of, railroad or rail transit lines or elements thereof that are in use or were historically used for the transportation of goods or passengers shall not be considered a use of a historic site under subsection (c), regardless of whether the railroad or rail transit line or element thereof is listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places.

(2)Exceptions.—
(A)In general.—

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to—

(i)

stations; or

(ii)

bridges or tunnels located on—

(I)

railroad lines that have been abandoned; or

(II)

transit lines that are not in use.

(B)Clarification with respect to certain bridges and tunnels.—

The bridges and tunnels referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii) do not include bridges or tunnels located on railroad or transit lines—

(i)

over which service has been discontinued; or

(ii)

that have been railbanked or otherwise reserved for the transportation of goods or passengers.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 97–449, § 1(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2419; Pub. L. 100–17, title I, § 133(d), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 173; Pub. L. 109–59, title VI, § 6009(a)(2), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1875; Pub. L. 113–287, § 5(p), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272; Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, §§ 1301(b), 1302(b), 1303(b), title XI, § 11502(b), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1376, 1378, 1690.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1983Enacted · Pub. L. 97-449 · 96 Stat. 2419
  • 1987Amended · Pub. L. 100-17 · 101 Stat. 173
  • 2005Amended · Pub. L. 109-59 · 119 Stat. 1875
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-287 · 128 Stat. 3272
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-94 · 129 Stat. 1376, 1378, 1690

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 97-449 on 1983-01-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case