49 U.S.C. § 41715 — Phase-out of slot rules at certain airports
submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-181 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 217 words · no verdicts yet
The slot rules in specified federal regulations end at certain airports on stated dates, subject to preserved federal authority and listed factors.
(a) The rules in 14 CFR part 93 subparts S and K do not apply after July 1, 2002, at Chicago O’Hare, or after January 1, 2007, at LaGuardia or John F. Kennedy. (b) This section and sections 41714 and 41716–41718 do not affect the FAA’s safety and air-traffic authority or any other Secretary authority to grant exemptions under section 41714. (c)(1) Before awarding exemptions under those sections, the Secretary may consider whether a petitioning carrier’s proposal gives the United States economy the greatest benefit, including United States jobs created by the carrier, suppliers, and related activities, and should give equal consideration to consumer benefits. (2) This does not apply when the requested exemption would use an aircraft type with no competing United States manufacturer.
The rules contained in subparts S and K of part 93, title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply—
after July 1, 2002, at Chicago O’Hare International Airport; and
after January 1, 2007, at LaGuardia Airport or John F. Kennedy International Airport.
Nothing in this section and sections 41714 and 41716–41718 shall be construed—
as affecting the Federal Aviation Administration’s authority for safety and the movement of air traffic; and
as affecting any other authority of the Secretary to grant exemptions under section 41714.
Before the award of slot exemptions under sections 41714 and 41716–41718, the Secretary of Transportation may consider, among other determining factors, whether the petitioning air carrier’s proposal provides the maximum benefit to the United States economy, including the number of United States jobs created by the air carrier, its suppliers, and related activities. The Secretary should give equal consideration to the consumer benefits associated with the award of such exemptions.
Paragraph (1) does not apply in any case in which the air carrier requesting the slot exemption is proposing to use under the exemption a type of aircraft for which there is not a competing United States manufacturer.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 106–181, title II, § 231(b)(2), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 108.)
- 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-181 · 114 Stat. 108
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-181 on 2000-04-05.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case