ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

5 U.S.C. § 3330bPreference eligibles; judicial redress

submitted 28 years ago by Pub. L. 105-339 to r/title-5-GOVERNMENT-ORGANIZATION-AND-EMPLOYEES · 176 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

In lieu of continuing the administrative redress procedure provided under section 3330a(d), a preference eligible, or a veteran described by section 3330a(a)(1)(B) with respect to a violation described by such section, may elect, in accordance with this section, to terminate those administrative proceedings and file an action with the appropriate United States district court not later than 60 days after the date of the election.

(b)

An election under this section may not be made—

(1)

before the 121st day after the date on which the appeal is filed with the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 3330a(d); or

(2)

after the Merit Systems Protection Board has issued a judicially reviewable decision on the merits of the appeal.

(c)

An election under this section shall be made, in writing, in such form and manner as the Merit Systems Protection Board shall by regulation prescribe. The election shall be effective as of the date on which it is received, and the administrative proceeding to which it relates shall terminate immediately upon the receipt of such election.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 105–339, § 3(a), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3184; amended Pub. L. 108–454, title VIII, § 804(b), Dec. 10, 2004, 118 Stat. 3626.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1998Enacted · Pub. L. 105-339 · 112 Stat. 3184
  • 2004Amended · Pub. L. 108-454 · 118 Stat. 3626

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-339 on 1998-10-31.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case