ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

1 U.S.C. § 209 — Copies of Supplements to Code of Laws of United States and of District of Columbia Code and Supplements; conclusive evidence of original

submitted 79 years ago by ch. 388 to r/title-1-GENERAL-PROVISIONS · 58 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law says official printed copies of the D.C. Code and its supplements count as conclusive proof of the original versions the Administrator of General Services keeps.

This is a single unlabeled rule. Copies of the Code of Laws relating to the District of Columbia, and copies of the supplements described in sections 202 and 203 of this title, count as conclusive evidence of the original code and supplements — but only if they were printed at the Government Publishing Office and carry its official imprint, and only as proof of the original documents kept in the custody of the Administrator of General Services.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Copies of the Code of Laws relating to the District of Columbia and copies of the supplements provided for by sections 202 and 203 of this title printed at the Government Publishing Office and bearing its imprint, shall be conclusive evidence of the original of such code and supplements in the custody of the Administrator of General Services.

Source credit: (July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 639; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263, § 2, 68 Stat. 1226; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, § 1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1947Enacted · Act of July 30, 1947, ch. 388 · 61 Stat. 639
  • 1954Amended · Act of Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1263 · 68 Stat. 1226
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-235 · 128 Stat. 2537

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 388 on 1947-07-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case