11 U.S.C. § 930 — Dismissal
submitted 48 years ago by Pub. L. 95-598 to r/title-11-BANKRUPTCY · 157 words · no verdicts yet
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
After notice and a hearing, the court may dismiss a case under this chapter for cause, including—
want of prosecution;
unreasonable delay by the debtor* that is prejudicial to creditors;
failure to propose a plan within the time fixed under section 941 of this title;
if a plan is not accepted within any time fixed by the court;
denial of confirmation of a plan under section 943(b) of this title and denial of additional time for filing another plan or a modification of a plan; or
if the court has retained jurisdiction after confirmation of a plan—
material default by the debtor with respect to a term of such plan; or
termination of such plan by reason of the occurrence of a condition specified in such plan.
The court shall dismiss a case under this chapter if confirmation of a plan under this chapter is refused.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2623, § 927; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 496, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 384; renumbered § 930, Pub. L. 100–597, § 7(1), Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 3029.)
- 1978Enacted · Pub. L. 95-598 · 92 Stat. 2623
- 1984Amended · Pub. L. 98-353 · 98 Stat. 384
- 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-597 · 102 Stat. 3029
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-598 on 1978-11-06.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case