12 U.S.C. § 216d — Severability

submitted 44 years ago by Pub. L. 96-221 to r/title-12-BANKS-AND-BANKING · 41 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

If a court finds part of this subchapter invalid, that doesn't affect the rest. The rest of the subchapter, and how it applies to other people or situations, keeps working normally.

This is a standard severability clause. If any provision of this subchapter, or how that provision applies to a particular person or circumstance, is held invalid, the rest of the subchapter — and how that same provision applies to other people or circumstances — is not affected by it.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

If any provision of this subchapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this subchapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 96–221, title VII, § 735, as added Pub. L. 97–320, title IV, § 408, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1515.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

1982Enacted · Pub. L. 96-221 · 96 Stat. 1515

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 96-221 on 1982-10-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case