ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

12 U.S.C. § 25bState law preemption standards for national banks and subsidiaries clarified

submitted 16 years ago by Pub. L. 111-203 to r/title-12-BANKS-AND-BANKING · 1,437 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law sets the rules for when state consumer-finance laws don't apply to national banks. A state law is preempted only if it treats national banks worse than state banks, significantly interferes with a bank's powers under a specific Supreme Court legal standard, or is overridden by another federal law. Most state consumer laws still fully apply to a bank's non-bank subsidiaries and affiliates.

(a) Definitions: (1) "National bank" includes any bank chartered under U.S. law, and any federal branch set up under the International Banking Act of 1978. (2) "State consumer financial law" means a state law that doesn't discriminate against national banks and that directly and specifically controls the manner, content, or terms of a financial transaction national banks are allowed to do, or an account tied to it, involving a consumer. (3) "Affiliate," "subsidiary," "includes," and "including" mean the same as they do in section 1813 of this title. (b) Preemption standard: (1) A state consumer financial law is preempted only if: (A) applying it would treat national banks worse than a bank chartered by that state; (B) under the legal standard from the Supreme Court's Barnett Bank decision, the state law prevents or significantly interferes with the bank's powers — a court, or the Comptroller of the Currency acting case-by-case, may decide this; or (C) some other federal law (not the National Bank Act) preempts it. (2) Savings clause: The National Bank Act does not preempt, override, or affect state law as applied to a subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank — unless that subsidiary or affiliate is itself chartered as a national bank. (3) Case-by-case basis: (A) This means a determination the Comptroller makes about how one state's consumer financial law affects a national bank subject to it, or an equivalent law of another state. (B) Before treating another state's law as having "substantively equivalent" terms to one already preempted, the Comptroller must first consult the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and consider its views. (4) Rule of construction: The National Bank Act does not take over the whole field of state law — other state laws can still apply. (5) Standards of review: (A) A court reviewing the Comptroller's preemption determinations must judge them based on how thorough the agency's reasoning was, how sound that reasoning is, how consistent it is with the agency's other rulings, and any other factors the court finds relevant. (B) Aside from that, this section doesn't change how much deference courts otherwise give the Comptroller when interpreting federal banking law. (6) Only the Comptroller personally may make a preemption determination under (b)(1)(B); this cannot be delegated to another officer or employee. (c) Substantial evidence: A Comptroller regulation or order can't declare a state consumer financial law inapplicable to a national bank unless the record shows substantial evidence supporting that specific finding, judged under the Barnett Bank legal standard. (d) Periodic review of preemption determinations: (1) The Comptroller must periodically review, through public notice and comment, each determination that federal law preempts a state consumer financial law — at least once every 5 years — then publish in the Federal Register whether it is keeping, dropping, or proposing to amend that determination. Any proposed amendment, and its resolution, must follow set notice-and-comment procedures. (2) Each time the Comptroller finishes such a review, it must report to the House Financial Services Committee and Senate Banking Committee, explaining whether it will keep, drop, or amend each determination, and why. (e) A state consumer financial law still applies to a subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank (unless that subsidiary or affiliate is itself chartered as a national bank), to the same extent it applies to any other person or business. (f) This section doesn't change a national bank's existing power, under section 85, to charge interest at the rate allowed by the state, territory, or district where it's located — including how "interest" is defined there. (g) The Comptroller must publish, and update at least every quarter, a list of its current preemption determinations, showing what activities and practices each one covers, and what state requirements are preempted. (h) Clarification for nondepository subsidiaries and affiliates: (1) "Depository institution," "subsidiary," and "affiliate" mean the same as in section 1813. (2) No provision of the National Bank Act preempts, overrides, or affects state law as applied to a subsidiary, affiliate, or agent of a national bank — unless that entity is itself chartered as a national bank. (i) Visitorial powers: Following the Supreme Court's decision in Cuomo v. Clearing House Assn., nothing that relates to limiting who may inspect or investigate a national bank stops a state attorney general (or other top state law-enforcement officer) from suing a national bank in an appropriate court to enforce a valid law and get the relief that law allows. (j) Enforcement actions: The Comptroller's ability to bring an enforcement action, under the National Bank Act or under 15 U.S.C. § 45, does not stop any private party from separately enforcing their own rights under federal or state law in court.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Definitions

For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(1) National bank

The term “national bank” includes—

(A)

any bank organized under the laws of the United States; and

(B)

any Federal branch established in accordance with the International Banking Act of 1978 [12 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.].

(2) State consumer financial laws

The term “State consumer financial law” means a State law that does not directly or indirectly discriminate against national banks and that directly and specifically regulates the manner, content, or terms and conditions of any financial transaction (as may be authorized for national banks to engage in), or any account related thereto, with respect to a consumer.

(3) Other definitions

The terms “affiliate”, “subsidiary”, “includes”, and “including” have the same meanings as in section 1813 of this title.

(b) Preemption standard
(1) In general

State consumer financial laws are preempted, only if—

(A)

application of a State consumer financial law would have a discriminatory effect on national banks, in comparison with the effect of the law on a bank chartered by that State;

(B)

in accordance with the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, et al., 517 U.S. 25 (1996), the State consumer financial law prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers; and any preemption determination under this subparagraph may be made by a court, or by regulation or order of the Comptroller of the Currency on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with applicable law; or

(C)

the State consumer financial law is preempted by a provision of Federal law other than title 62 of the Revised Statutes.

(2) Savings clause

Title 62 of the Revised Statutes and section 371 of this title do not preempt, annul, or affect the applicability of any State law to any subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank (other than a subsidiary or affiliate that is chartered as a national bank).

(3) Case-by-case basis
(A) Definition

As used in this section the term “case-by-case basis” refers to a determination pursuant to this section made by the Comptroller concerning the impact of a particular State consumer financial law on any national bank that is subject to that law, or the law of any other State with substantively equivalent terms.

(B) Consultation

When making a determination on a case-by-case basis that a State consumer financial law of another State has substantively equivalent terms as one that the Comptroller is preempting, the Comptroller shall first consult with the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and shall take the views of the Bureau into account when making the determination.

(4) Rule of construction

Title 62 of the Revised Statutes does not occupy the field in any area of State law.

(5) Standards of review
(A) Preemption

A court reviewing any determinations made by the Comptroller regarding preemption of a State law by title 62 of the Revised Statutes or section 371 of this title shall assess the validity of such determinations, depending upon the thoroughness evident in the consideration of the agency, the validity of the reasoning of the agency, the consistency with other valid determinations made by the agency, and other factors which the court finds persuasive and relevant to its decision.

(B) Savings clause

Except as provided in subparagraph (A), nothing in this section shall affect the deference that a court may afford to the Comptroller in making determinations regarding the meaning or interpretation of title LXII of the Revised Statutes of the United States or other Federal laws.

(6) Comptroller determination not delegable

Any regulation, order, or determination made by the Comptroller of the Currency under paragraph (1)(B) shall be made by the Comptroller, and shall not be delegable to another officer or employee of the Comptroller of the Currency.

(c) Substantial evidence

No regulation or order of the Comptroller of the Currency prescribed under subsection (b)(1)(B), shall be interpreted or applied so as to invalidate, or otherwise declare inapplicable to a national bank, the provision of the State consumer financial law, unless substantial evidence, made on the record of the proceeding, supports the specific finding regarding the preemption of such provision in accordance with the legal standard of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, et al., 517 U.S. 25 (1996).

(d) Periodic review of preemption determinations
(1) In general

The Comptroller of the Currency shall periodically conduct a review, through notice and public comment, of each determination that a provision of Federal law preempts a State consumer financial law. The agency shall conduct such review within the 5-year period after prescribing or otherwise issuing such determination, and at least once during each 5-year period thereafter. After conducting the review of, and inspecting the comments made on, the determination, the agency shall publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the decision to continue or rescind the determination or a proposal to amend the determination. Any such notice of a proposal to amend a determination and the subsequent resolution of such proposal shall comply with the procedures set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of section 43 of this title.

(2) Reports to Congress

At the time of issuing a review conducted under paragraph (1), the Comptroller of the Currency shall submit a report regarding such review to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. The report submitted to the respective committees shall address whether the agency intends to continue, rescind, or propose to amend any determination that a provision of Federal law preempts a State consumer financial law, and the reasons therefor.

(e) Application of State consumer financial law to subsidiaries and affiliates

Notwithstanding any provision of title 62 of the Revised Statutes or section 371 of this title, a State consumer financial law shall apply to a subsidiary or affiliate of a national bank (other than a subsidiary or affiliate that is chartered as a national bank) to the same extent that the State consumer financial law applies to any person, corporation, or other entity subject to such State law.

(f) Preservation of powers related to charging interest

No provision of title 62 of the Revised Statutes shall be construed as altering or otherwise affecting the authority conferred by section 85 of this title for the charging of interest by a national bank at the rate allowed by the laws of the State, territory, or district where the bank is located, including with respect to the meaning of “interest” under such provision.

(g) Transparency of OCC preemption determinations

The Comptroller of the Currency shall publish and update no less frequently than quarterly, a list of preemption determinations by the Comptroller of the Currency then in effect that identifies the activities and practices covered by each determination and the requirements and constraints determined to be preempted.

(h) Clarification of law applicable to nondepository institution subsidiaries and affiliates of national banks
(1) Definitions

For purposes of this subsection, the terms “depository institution”, “subsidiary”, and “affiliate” have the same meanings as in section 1813 of this title.

(2) Rule of construction

No provision of title 62 of the Revised Statutes or section 371 of this title shall be construed as preempting, annulling, or affecting the applicability of State law to any subsidiary, affiliate, or agent of a national bank (other than a subsidiary, affiliate, or agent that is chartered as a national bank).

(i) Visitorial powers
(1)1 In general

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Cuomo v. Clearing House Assn., L. L. C. (129 S. Ct. 2710 (2009)), no provision of title 62 of the Revised Statutes which relates to visitorial powers or otherwise limits or restricts the visitorial authority to which any national bank is subject shall be construed as limiting or restricting the authority of any attorney general (or other chief law enforcement officer) of any State to bring an action against a national bank in a court of appropriate jurisdiction to enforce an applicable law and to seek relief as authorized by such law.

(j) Enforcement actions

The ability of the Comptroller of the Currency to bring an enforcement action under title 62 of the Revised Statutes or section 45 of title 15 does not preclude any private party from enforcing rights granted under Federal or State law in the courts.

Source credit: (R.S. § 5136C, as added and amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §§ 1044(a), 1045, 1047(a), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2014, 2017, 2018.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2010Enacted · Pub. L. 111-203 · 124 Stat. 2014, 2017, 2018

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 111-203 on 2010-07-21.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case