ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

15 U.S.C. § 1681s–1 — Information on overdue child support obligations

submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 90-321 to r/title-15-COMMERCE-AND-TRADE · 88 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section requires a consumer reporting agency to include qualifying overdue child-support information in a consumer report. The information must come from a specified government source and be no more than seven years old.

despite any other provision of this subchapter, a consumer reporting agency must include in any consumer report furnished by the agency in accordance with section 1681b of this title , any information on the failure of the consumer to pay overdue support which—
(1) is provided— (A) to the consumer reporting agency by a State or local child support enforcement agency; or (B) to the consumer reporting agency and verified by any local, State, or Federal Government agency; and
(2) antedates the report by 7 years or less.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, a consumer reporting agency shall include in any consumer report furnished by the agency in accordance with section 1681b of this title, any information on the failure of the consumer to pay overdue support which—

(1)

is provided—

(A)

to the consumer reporting agency by a State or local child support enforcement agency; or

(B)

to the consumer reporting agency and verified by any local, State, or Federal Government agency; and

(2)

antedates the report by 7 years or less.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, § 622, as added Pub. L. 102–537, § 2(a), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3531.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 90-321 · 106 Stat. 3531

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 90-321 on 1992-10-27.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case