15 U.S.C. § 4001 — Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
submitted 44 years ago by Pub. L. 97-290 to r/title-15-COMMERCE-AND-TRADE · 493 words · no verdicts yet
Congress finds that exports and services are important to jobs and the economy, while trade deficits, unused export capacity, fragmented services, regulation, and limited financing hinder exports. The chapter seeks to increase exports by improving export services, supporting export-trade organizations and companies, allowing specified bank investments, easing trade-finance limits, and changing antitrust treatment for certain export trade.
(a) Congress finds that: (1) United States* exports create and maintain one of every nine manufacturing jobs and generate one of every seven dollars of United States goods produced; (2) growing service industries are vital because they employ seven of every ten Americans, provide 65 percent of the gross national product, and offer great potential for increased industrial trade in finished products; (3) trade deficits contribute to a falling dollar in international markets and inflation in the United States; (4) tens of thousands of small and medium-sized United States businesses make exportable goods or services* but do not export; (5) although the United States leads the world in agricultural exports, many farm products could be marketed abroad more widely and effectively through export trading companies; (6) export-trade services are split among many functions, and companies offering them lack enough financial leverage to reach many potential exporters; (7) the United States needs developed export intermediaries that gain scale and expertise to export profitably at low per-unit cost to producers; (8) United States export trading companies have been hindered by business attitudes and government regulation; (9) State* and local activities that start, assist, or expand exports can expand total exports and test innovative programs suited to local, State, and regional needs; (10) United States trading companies need access to United States banking resources, expertise, and knowledge at home and abroad to compete with foreign trading companies; and (11) the Commerce Department is responsible for developing and promoting United States exports, especially finished products made by United States manufacturers.
(b) Purpose. This chapter seeks to increase United States exports of products and services by encouraging more efficient export-trade services for United States producers and suppliers. It does this especially by creating a Commerce Department office to promote export-trade associations and companies, allowing bank holding companies, bankers’ banks, and specified subsidiaries to invest in export trading companies, reducing limits on trade financing by financial institutions, and changing how antitrust laws* apply to certain export trade*.
The Congress finds that—
United States* exports are responsible for creating and maintaining one out of every nine manufacturing jobs in the United States and for generating one out of every seven dollars of total United States goods produced;
the rapidly growing service-related industries are vital to the well-being of the United States economy inasmuch as they create jobs for seven out of every ten Americans, provide 65 per centum of the Nation’s gross national product, and offer the greatest potential for significantly increased industrial trade involving finished products;
trade deficits contribute to the decline of the dollar on international currency markets and have an inflationary impact on the United States economy;
tens of thousands of small- and medium-sized United States businesses produce exportable goods or services* but do not engage in exporting;
although the United States is the world’s leading agricultural exporting nation, many farm products are not marketed as widely and effectively abroad as they could be through export trading companies;
export trade services* in the United States are fragmented into a multitude of separate functions, and companies attempting to offer export trade* services lack financial leverage to reach a significant number of potential United States exporters;
the United States needs well-developed export trade intermediaries which can achieve economies of scale and acquire expertise enabling them to export goods and services profitably, at low per unit cost to producers;
the development of export trading companies in the United States has been hampered by business attitudes and by Government regulations;
those activities of State* and local governmental authorities which initiate, facilitate, or expand exports of goods and services can be an important source for expansion of total United States exports, as well as for experimentation in the development of innovative export programs keyed to local, State, and regional economic needs;
if United States trading companies are to be successful in promoting United States exports and in competing with foreign trading companies, they should be able to draw on the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the United States banking system, both in the United States and abroad; and
the Department of Commerce is responsible for the development and promotion of United States exports, and especially for facilitating the export of finished products by United States manufacturers.
It is the purpose of this chapter to increase United States exports of products and services by encouraging more efficient provision of export trade services to United States producers and suppliers, in particular by establishing an office within the Department of Commerce to promote the formation of export trade associations and export trading companies, by permitting bank holding companies, bankers’ banks, and Edge Act corporations and agreement corporations that are subsidiaries of bank holding companies to invest in export trading companies, by reducing restrictions on trade financing provided by financial institutions, and by modifying the application of the antitrust laws* to certain export trade.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 97–290, title I, § 102, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1233.)
- 1982Enacted · Pub. L. 97-290 · 96 Stat. 1233
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 97-290 on 1982-10-08.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case