15 U.S.C. § 5722 — Relation to State laws
submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 102-556 to r/title-15-COMMERCE-AND-TRADE · 173 words · no verdicts yet
A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.
This subchapter does not annul, alter, or affect, or exempt any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter from complying with, the laws of any State with respect to telephone billing practices, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with any provision of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. The Commission* is authorized to determine whether such inconsistencies exist. The Commission may not determine that any State law is inconsistent with any provision of this subchapter 1 if the Commission determines that such law gives greater protection to the consumer.
The Commission shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this subchapter any class of telephone-billed purchase* transactions within any State if it determines that under the law of that State that class of transactions is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed under this subchapter 1 or that such law gives greater protection to the consumer, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–556, title III, § 302, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4192.)
- 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 102-556 · 106 Stat. 4192
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-556 on 1992-10-28.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case