ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

15 U.S.C. § 78j–1Audit requirements

submitted 92 years ago by Pub. L. 104-67 to r/title-15-COMMERCE-AND-TRADE · 2,332 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section sets rules for public company audits, including checking for illegal acts, related-party deals, and going-concern doubts. It also limits what non-audit services auditors can provide and requires independent audit committees. Companies must promptly tell the SEC about serious unresolved audit problems.

(a) In general — Every required audit of an issuer's financial statements must include: (1) steps designed to reasonably catch illegal acts that would materially affect the numbers in the financial statements; (2) steps designed to spot related-party transactions that matter to the financial statements or need disclosure; and (3) a check on whether there's real doubt the company can keep operating through the next year. (b) Required response to audit discoveries — (1) If the auditor learns of information suggesting an illegal act may have happened (even if it seems immaterial), the firm must: determine whether it's likely an illegal act occurred, and if so, figure out its possible effect on the financial statements, including fines and damages; and, unless the act is clearly minor, tell company management and make sure the audit committee (or board, if there's no committee) is properly informed. (2) If the firm decides — after telling the audit committee or board — that the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements, that management and the board haven't taken proper fix-it steps, and that the failure to act will likely mean the auditor has to depart from a standard report or resign, then the firm must report this directly to the board of directors as soon as practical. (3) A company whose board gets this report must notify the SEC within one business day and give the auditor a copy of that notice. If the auditor doesn't get a copy in time, the auditor must either resign from the engagement, or send the SEC its own report (or documentation of an oral report) within one business day after that failure. (4) If the firm resigns under (3)(A), it must still send the SEC its report within one business day after the company's own failure to notify. (c) Auditor liability limitation — No auditor can be sued in a private lawsuit over any finding, conclusion, or statement made in a report filed under paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (b), including rules made under it. (d) Civil penalties in cease-and-desist proceedings — If the SEC finds, after notice and a hearing, that an auditor willfully violated subsection (b)(3) or (4), the SEC can impose a civil penalty on the auditor and anyone else it finds caused the violation, on top of any cease-and-desist order. The penalty amount follows the standards in section 78u–2. (e) Preservation of existing authority — Except for subsection (d), nothing here limits or changes the SEC's authority under this chapter. (f) Definitions — "Illegal act" means any act or omission that breaks a law, rule, or regulation with legal force. "Issuer" means a company (as defined in section 78c) whose securities are registered under section 78l, or that must file reports under section 78o(d), or that has filed — and not withdrawn — a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 that hasn't yet taken effect. (g) Prohibited activities — Except as subsection (h) allows, it's illegal for an auditor doing a required audit to also provide, at the same time, non-audit services to that client, including: (1) bookkeeping or accounting-record services; (2) financial information systems design; (3) appraisal, valuation, or fairness-opinion services; (4) actuarial services; (5) internal audit outsourcing; (6) management or HR functions; (7) broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services; (8) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (9) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "Board") decides by rule is off-limits. (h) Preapproval required for non-audit services — An auditor can provide a non-audit service not listed in (g)(1) through (9), including tax services, only if the audit committee approves it in advance, following subsection (i). (i) Preapproval requirements — (1)(A) All audit and non-audit services (except as (B) allows) must be preapproved by the audit committee. (B) This preapproval isn't required if: (i) all non-audit services together are no more than 5% of what the issuer paid its auditor that fiscal year; (ii) the issuer didn't realize at the time these were non-audit services; and (iii) the services are promptly brought to the audit committee, which approves them before the audit is finished. (2) Audit committee approval of a non-audit service must be disclosed to investors in periodic reports under section 78m(a). (3) The audit committee can delegate preapproval power to one or more independent-director members; any such approval must be reported to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting. (4) If the audit committee approves an audit service as part of the engagement's scope, that service counts as preapproved. (j) Audit partner rotation — It's illegal for an auditor to keep auditing an issuer if the lead or reviewing audit partner has worked on that issuer's audit for each of the past five years. (k) Reports to audit committees — Every auditor doing a required audit must timely report to the audit committee: (1) all critical accounting policies used; (2) any alternative accounting treatments discussed with management, their effects, and which one the auditor preferred; and (3) other important written communications between the auditor and management, like management letters. (l) Conflicts of interest — It's illegal for an auditor to audit an issuer if that issuer's CEO, controller, CFO, chief accounting officer, or someone in an equivalent role, used to work for that same audit firm and took part in that issuer's audit during the year before the current audit started. (m) Standards relating to audit committees — (1)(A) Within 270 days of July 30, 2002, the SEC must direct exchanges and associations to bar listing any issuer that doesn't meet the requirements of paragraphs (2) through (6). (B) The SEC's rules must let an issuer fix problems before that bar kicks in. (2) The audit committee, as a board committee, is directly responsible for hiring, paying, and overseeing the auditor — including resolving disputes between management and the auditor — and the auditor must report directly to the committee. (3)(A) Every audit committee member must be a board member and independent. (B) To count as independent, a member can't (outside their committee or board roles) accept consulting or advisory fees from the issuer, or be affiliated with the issuer or its subsidiaries. (C) The SEC can exempt a particular relationship from this rule if it decides that's appropriate. (4) Each audit committee must set up procedures for receiving and handling complaints about accounting or auditing issues, and for employees to submit concerns anonymously and confidentially. (5) Each audit committee can hire its own independent counsel and advisers as needed. (6) Each issuer must properly fund the audit committee to pay the auditor and any advisers the committee hires.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

Each audit required pursuant to this chapter of the financial statements of an issuer by a registered public accounting firm shall include, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, as may be modified or supplemented from time to time by the Commission

(1)

procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of detecting illegal acts that would have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts;

(2)

procedures designed to identify related party transactions that are material to the financial statements or otherwise require disclosure therein; and

(3)

an evaluation of whether there is substantial doubt about the ability of the issuer to continue as a going concern during the ensuing fiscal year.

(b) Required response to audit discoveries
(1) Investigation and report to management

If, in the course of conducting an audit pursuant to this chapter to which subsection (a) applies, the registered public accounting firm detects or otherwise becomes aware of information indicating that an illegal act (whether or not perceived to have a material effect on the financial statements of the issuer) has or may have occurred, the firm shall, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, as may be modified or supplemented from time to time by the Commission—

(A)
(i)

determine whether it is likely that an illegal act has occurred; and

(ii)

if so, determine and consider the possible effect of the illegal act on the financial statements of the issuer, including any contingent monetary effects, such as fines, penalties, and damages; and

(B)

as soon as practicable, inform the appropriate level of the management of the issuer and assure that the audit committee of the issuer, or the board of directors of the issuer in the absence of such a committee, is adequately informed with respect to illegal acts that have been detected or have otherwise come to the attention of such firm in the course of the audit, unless the illegal act is clearly inconsequential.

(2) Response to failure to take remedial action

If, after determining that the audit committee of the board of directors of the issuer, or the board of directors of the issuer in the absence of an audit committee, is adequately informed with respect to illegal acts that have been detected or have otherwise come to the attention of the firm in the course of the audit of such firm, the registered public accounting firm concludes that—

(A)

the illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements of the issuer;

(B)

the senior management has not taken, and the board of directors has not caused senior management to take, timely and appropriate remedial actions with respect to the illegal act; and

(C)

the failure to take remedial action is reasonably expected to warrant departure from a standard report of the auditor, when made, or warrant resignation from the audit engagement;

the registered public accounting firm shall, as soon as practicable, directly report its conclusions to the board of directors.

(3) Notice to Commission; response to failure to notify

An issuer whose board of directors receives a report under paragraph (2) shall inform the Commission by notice not later than 1 business day after the receipt of such report and shall furnish the registered public accounting firm making such report with a copy of the notice furnished to the Commission. If the registered public accounting firm fails to receive a copy of the notice before the expiration of the required 1-business-day period, the registered public accounting firm shall—

(A)

resign from the engagement; or

(B)

furnish to the Commission a copy of its report (or the documentation of any oral report given) not later than 1 business day following such failure to receive notice.

(4) Report after resignation

If a registered public accounting firm resigns from an engagement under paragraph (3)(A), the firm shall, not later than 1 business day following the failure by the issuer to notify the Commission under paragraph (3), furnish to the Commission a copy of the report of the firm (or the documentation of any oral report given).

(c) Auditor liability limitation

No registered public accounting firm shall be liable in a private action for any finding, conclusion, or statement expressed in a report made pursuant to paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (b), including any rule promulgated pursuant thereto.

(d) Civil penalties in cease-and-desist proceedings

If the Commission finds, after notice and opportunity for hearing in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 78u–3 of this title, that a registered public accounting firm has willfully violated paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (b), the Commission may, in addition to entering an order under section 78u–3 of this title, impose a civil penalty against the registered public accounting firm and any other person that the Commission finds was a cause of such violation. The determination to impose a civil penalty and the amount of the penalty shall be governed by the standards set forth in section 78u–2 of this title.

(e) Preservation of existing authority

Except as provided in subsection (d), nothing in this section shall be held to limit or otherwise affect the authority of the Commission under this chapter.

(f) Definitions

As used in this section, the term “illegal act” means an act or omission that violates any law, or any rule or regulation having the force of law. As used in this section, the term “issuer” means an issuer (as defined in section 78c of this title), the securities of which are registered under section 78l of this title, or that is required to file reports pursuant to section 78o(d) of this title, or that files or has filed a registration statement that has not yet become effective under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.), and that it has not withdrawn.

(g) Prohibited activities

Except as provided in subsection (h), it shall be unlawful for a registered public accounting firm (and any associated person of that firm, to the extent determined appropriate by the Commission) that performs for any issuer any audit required by this chapter or the rules of the Commission under this chapter or, beginning 180 days after the date of commencement of the operations of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board established under section 7211 of this title (in this section referred to as the “Board”), the rules of the Board, to provide to that issuer, contemporaneously with the audit, any non-audit service, including—

(1)

bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client;

(2)

financial information systems design and implementation;

(3)

appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports;

(4)

actuarial services;

(5)

internal audit outsourcing services;

(6)

management functions or human resources;

(7)

broker or dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services;

(8)

legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and

(9)

any other service that the Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.

(h) Preapproval required for non-audit services

A registered public accounting firm may engage in any non-audit service, including tax services, that is not described in any of paragraphs (1) through (9) of subsection (g) for an audit client, only if the activity is approved in advance by the audit committee of the issuer, in accordance with subsection (i).

(i) Preapproval requirements
(1) In general
(A) Audit committee action

All auditing services (which may entail providing comfort letters in connection with securities underwritings or statutory audits required for insurance companies for purposes of State law) and non-audit services, other than as provided in subparagraph (B), provided to an issuer by the auditor of the issuer shall be preapproved by the audit committee of the issuer.

(B) De minimis exception

The preapproval requirement under subparagraph (A) is waived with respect to the provision of non-audit services for an issuer, if—

(i)

the aggregate amount of all such non-audit services provided to the issuer constitutes not more than 5 percent of the total amount of revenues paid by the issuer to its auditor during the fiscal year in which the non-audit services are provided;

(ii)

such services were not recognized by the issuer at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and

(iii)

such services are promptly brought to the attention of the audit committee of the issuer and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the audit committee or by 1 or more members of the audit committee who are members of the board of directors to whom authority to grant such approvals has been delegated by the audit committee.

(2) Disclosure to investors

Approval by an audit committee of an issuer under this subsection of a non-audit service to be performed by the auditor of the issuer shall be disclosed to investors in periodic reports required by section 78m(a) of this title.

(3) Delegation authority

The audit committee of an issuer may delegate to 1 or more designated members of the audit committee who are independent directors of the board of directors, the authority to grant preapprovals required by this subsection. The decisions of any member to whom authority is delegated under this paragraph to preapprove an activity under this subsection shall be presented to the full audit committee at each of its scheduled meetings.

(4) Approval of audit services for other purposes

In carrying out its duties under subsection (m)(2), if the audit committee of an issuer approves an audit service within the scope of the engagement of the auditor, such audit service shall be deemed to have been preapproved for purposes of this subsection.

(j) Audit partner rotation

It shall be unlawful for a registered public accounting firm to provide audit services to an issuer if the lead (or coordinating) audit partner (having primary responsibility for the audit), or the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit, has performed audit services for that issuer in each of the 5 previous fiscal years of that issuer.

(k) Reports to audit committees

Each registered public accounting firm that performs for any issuer any audit required by this chapter shall timely report to the audit committee of the issuer—

(1)

all critical accounting policies and practices to be used;

(2)

all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management officials of the issuer, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the registered public accounting firm; and

(3)

other material written communications between the registered public accounting firm and the management of the issuer, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences.

(l) Conflicts of interest

It shall be unlawful for a registered public accounting firm to perform for an issuer any audit service required by this chapter, if a chief executive officer, controller, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, or any person serving in an equivalent position for the issuer, was employed by that registered independent public accounting firm and participated in any capacity in the audit of that issuer during the 1-year period preceding the date of the initiation of the audit.

(m) Standards relating to audit committees
(1) Commission rules
(A) In general

Effective not later than 270 days after July 30, 2002, the Commission shall, by rule, direct the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that is not in compliance with the requirements of any portion of paragraphs (2) through (6).

(B) Opportunity to cure defects

The rules of the Commission under subparagraph (A) shall provide for appropriate procedures for an issuer to have an opportunity to cure any defects that would be the basis for a prohibition under subparagraph (A), before the imposition of such prohibition.

(2) Responsibilities relating to registered public accounting firms

The audit committee of each issuer, in its capacity as a committee of the board of directors, shall be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm employed by that issuer (including resolution of disagreements between management and the auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work, and each such registered public accounting firm shall report directly to the audit committee.

(3) Independence
(A) In general

Each member of the audit committee of the issuer shall be a member of the board of directors of the issuer, and shall otherwise be independent.

(B) Criteria

In order to be considered to be independent for purposes of this paragraph, a member of an audit committee of an issuer may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee—

(i)

accept any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the issuer; or

(ii)

be an affiliated person of the issuer or any subsidiary thereof.

(C) Exemption authority

The Commission may exempt from the requirements of subparagraph (B) a particular relationship with respect to audit committee members, as the Commission determines appropriate in light of the circumstances.

(4) Complaints

Each audit committee shall establish procedures for—

(A)

the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the issuer regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and

(B)

the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the issuer of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

(5) Authority to engage advisers

Each audit committee shall have the authority to engage independent counsel and other advisers, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties.

(6) Funding

Each issuer shall provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the audit committee, in its capacity as a committee of the board of directors, for payment of compensation—

(A)

to the registered public accounting firm employed by the issuer for the purpose of rendering or issuing an audit report; and

(B)

to any advisers employed by the audit committee under paragraph (5).

Source credit: (June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, § 10A, as added Pub. L. 104–67, title III, § 301(a), Dec. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 762; amended Pub. L. 107–204, title II, §§ 201(a), 202–204, 205(b), (d), 206, title III, § 301, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 771–775; Pub. L. 111–203, title IX, § 985(b)(3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1933.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1934Enacted · Pub. L. 104-67 · 109 Stat. 762
  • 2002Amended · Pub. L. 107-204 · 116 Stat. 771
  • 2010Amended · Pub. L. 111-203 · 124 Stat. 1933

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 104-67 on 1934-06-06.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case