ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 1451Congressional findings

submitted 54 years ago by Pub. L. 89-454 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 586 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress finds that the coastal zone has important natural, economic, cultural, and public values that are being damaged by competing uses and poorly planned development. It calls for stronger state, federal, and local planning, including protection from pollution, erosion, habitat loss, conflicts over ocean uses, and possible sea-level rise.

Congress finds that— (a) Managing, using, protecting, and developing the coastal zone effectively is a national interest. (b) The coastal zone contains many natural, commercial, recreational, ecological, industrial, and scenic resources that matter now and may matter to the Nation’s future. (c) Population growth and economic development have created competing demands for coastal land and water, including industry, commerce, homes, recreation, mineral and fossil-fuel extraction, transportation, navigation, waste disposal, and fishing. These demands have caused losses of marine life and wildlife, damage to nutrient-rich areas and ecological systems, less open space for public use, and shoreline erosion. (d) Coastal habitats and the fish, shellfish, other marine life, and wildlife in them are fragile and very vulnerable to destruction by human changes. (e) Important ecological, cultural, historic, and scenic coastal values needed for everyone’s well-being are being permanently damaged or lost. (f) New and growing demands for food, energy, minerals, defense, recreation, waste disposal, transportation, and industry in the Great Lakes, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and Outer Continental Shelf are stressing those areas and creating serious conflicts among important uses and values. (g) Poorly planned development is damaging special natural and scenic features. (h) Because uses compete and coastal natural systems need urgent protection and priority, existing state and local planning and land-and-water-use controls are inadequate. (i) Better protection and use of coastal land and water requires encouraging states to use their full authority, with federal and local governments and other affected interests, to develop coastal land-and-water-use programs with unified policies, criteria, standards, methods, and processes for decisions of more than local importance. (j) Federal financial help for state and local needs caused by new or expanded energy activity in or affecting the coastal zone would advance the national goal of greater energy self-sufficiency. (k) Land uses in the coastal zone and on nearby land that drains into it can significantly affect coastal-water and habitat quality, so control of pollution from land uses must improve. (l) Because global warming may cause a substantial sea-level rise with serious coastal effects, coastal states must anticipate and plan for it. (m) Coastal states have major interests in protecting, managing, and developing exclusive-economic-zone resources because they are close to and rely on the ocean. Those interests can be served only by active state participation in all federal programs affecting those resources and, when appropriate, by state ocean-resource plans included in federally approved coastal-management programs.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Congress finds that—

(a)

There is a national interest in the effective management, beneficial use, protection, and development of the coastal zone.

(b)

The coastal zone is rich in a variety of natural, commercial, recreational, ecological, industrial, and esthetic resources of immediate and potential value to the present and future well-being of the Nation.

(c)

The increasing and competing demands upon the lands and waters of our coastal zone occasioned by population growth and economic development, including requirements for industry, commerce, residential development, recreation, extraction of mineral resources and fossil fuels, transportation and navigation, waste disposal, and harvesting of fish, shellfish, and other living marine resources, have resulted in the loss of living marine resources, wildlife, nutrient-rich areas, permanent and adverse changes to ecological systems, decreasing open space for public use, and shoreline erosion.

(d)

The habitat areas of the coastal zone, and the fish, shellfish, other living marine resources, and wildlife therein, are ecologically fragile and consequently extremely vulnerable to destruction by man’s alterations.

(e)

Important ecological, cultural, historic, and esthetic values in the coastal zone which are essential to the well-being of all citizens are being irretrievably damaged or lost.

(f)

New and expanding demands for food, energy, minerals, defense needs, recreation, waste disposal, transportation, and industrial activities in the Great Lakes, territorial sea, exclusive economic zone, and Outer Continental Shelf are placing stress on these areas and are creating the need for resolution of serious conflicts among important and competing uses and values in coastal and ocean waters; 1

(g)

Special natural and scenic characteristics are being damaged by ill-planned development that threatens these values.

(h)

In light of competing demands and the urgent need to protect and to give high priority to natural systems in the coastal zone, present state and local institutional arrangements for planning and regulating land and water uses in such areas are inadequate.

(i)

The key to more effective protection and use of the land and water resources of the coastal zone is to encourage the states to exercise their full authority over the lands and waters in the coastal zone by assisting the states, in cooperation with Federal and local governments and other vitally affected interests, in developing land and water use programs for the coastal zone, including unified policies, criteria, standards, methods, and processes for dealing with land and water use decisions of more than local significance.

(j)

The national objective of attaining a greater degree of energy self-sufficiency would be advanced by providing Federal financial assistance to meet state and local needs resulting from new or expanded energy activity in or affecting the coastal zone.

(k)

Land uses in the coastal zone, and the uses of adjacent lands which drain into the coastal zone, may significantly affect the quality of coastal waters and habitats, and efforts to control coastal water pollution from land use activities must be improved.

(l)

Because global warming may result in a substantial sea level rise with serious adverse effects in the coastal zone, coastal states must anticipate and plan for such an occurrence.

(m)

Because of their proximity to and reliance upon the ocean and its resources, the coastal states have substantial and significant interests in the protection, management, and development of the resources of the exclusive economic zone that can only be served by the active participation of coastal states in all Federal programs affecting such resources and, wherever appropriate, by the development of state ocean resource plans as part of their federally approved coastal zone management programs.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 89–454, title III, § 302, as added Pub. L. 92–583, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1280; amended Pub. L. 94–370, § 2, July 26, 1976, 90 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 96–464, § 2, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2060; Pub. L. 101–508, title VI, § 6203(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–300.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1972Enacted · Pub. L. 89-454 · 86 Stat. 1280
  • 1976Amended · Pub. L. 94-370 · 90 Stat. 1013
  • 1980Amended · Pub. L. 96-464 · 94 Stat. 2060
  • 1990Amended · Pub. L. 101-508 · 104 Stat. 1388

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 89-454 on 1972-10-27.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case