ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 225Laws applicable; easements and rights-of-way

submitted 107 years ago by ch. 44 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 88 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Older federal laws about granting rights-of-way through national parks and forests for irrigation and similar purposes still apply to Grand Canyon National Park, as long as they fit the park's main purposes. The Secretary of the Interior may also grant easements or rights-of-way for railroads through the park, on whatever conditions the Secretary thinks are proper.

As long as it fits the main purposes of Grand Canyon National Park, an older law - the Act of February 15, 1901, which allows rights-of-way through certain national parks and forests for irrigation and other purposes - and later related laws still apply to the land inside the park. The Secretary of the Interior may also grant easements or rights-of-way for railroads to cross or run through the park, using whatever conditions the Secretary thinks are appropriate.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Whenever consistent with the primary purposes of Grand Canyon National Park, the Act of February fifteenth, nineteen hundred and one,1 applicable to the locations of rights of way in certain national parks and the national forests for irrigation and other purposes, and subsequent Acts shall be and remain applicable to the lands included within the park. The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion and upon such conditions as he may deem proper, grant easements or rights of way for railroads upon or across the park.

Source credit: (Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 44, § 5, 40 Stat. 1178.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1919Enacted · Act of Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 44 · 40 Stat. 1178

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 44 on 1919-02-26.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case