ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 251lRetrocession of lands to State; Quileute Indian Reservation jurisdiction; concurrent legislative jurisdiction with State

submitted 50 years ago by Pub. L. 94-578 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 115 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Washington State regains legal jurisdiction over land excluded from the park, once it accepts that jurisdiction back. Land restored to the Quileute Reservation follows the same state and tribal rules as the reservation's other trust land. The state also shares jurisdiction with the U.S. over land still inside the revised park.

Once the State of Washington accepts it, two things happen: (1) the jurisdiction the United States had gained over land excluded from Olympic National Park's boundaries by section 251e of this title goes back (is "retroceded") to the state — except that land restored to the Quileute Indian Reservation stays subject to the same state and tribal jurisdiction as the reservation's other trust land; and (2) the state also gets concurrent (shared) legislative jurisdiction over all the land within the park's boundary as revised by sections 251e to 251m of this title, in whatever way the Governor of Washington and the Secretary determine.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Effective upon acceptance thereof by the State of Washington (1) the jurisdiction which the United States acquired over those lands excluded from the boundaries of Olympic National Park by section 251e of this title is hereby retroceded to the State: Provided, That the lands restored to the Quileute Indian Reservation shall be subject to the same State and Tribal jurisdiction as all other trust lands within said Reservation; and (2) there is hereby retroceded to such State concurrent legislative jurisdiction, as the Governor of the State of Washington and the Secretary shall determine, over and within all territory within the boundaries of the park as revised by sections 251e to 251m of this title.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 94–578, title III, § 320(i), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2741.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1976Enacted · Pub. L. 94-578 · 90 Stat. 2741

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 94-578 on 1976-10-21.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case