ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 410aaa–21Findings

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-433 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 143 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress explains why Joshua Tree National Monument should become a bigger national park. It says the current boundaries leave out valuable federal land that needs protection. It also says the wilderness there deserves the strongest legal protection available.

Congress makes five findings here, laid out as a numbered list: 1. A 1936 proclamation by President Franklin Roosevelt created Joshua Tree National Monument to protect objects of historical and scientific interest. 2. Joshua Tree National Monument is now a major part of the National Park System, with extraordinary value that millions of visitors enjoy. 3. The monument's boundaries, as changed in 1950 and 1961, leave out nearby federal land with essential, top-tier natural, ecological, archeological, paleontological, cultural, historical, and wilderness value — leaving that land open to development and inconsistent management. 4. Joshua Tree National Monument should be made bigger, by adding nearby federal land that is good enough to be a national park, and should get full recognition and legal protection as a National Park. 5. The wilderness within Joshua Tree that hasn't yet been designated should get legal protection under the Wilderness Act.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Congress finds that—

(1)

a proclamation by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1936 established Joshua Tree National Monument to protect various objects of historical and scientific interest;

(2)

Joshua Tree National Monument today is recognized as a major unit of the National Park System, having extraordinary values enjoyed by millions of visitors;

(3)

the monument boundaries as modified in 1950 and 1961 exclude and thereby expose to incompatible development and inconsistent management, contiguous Federal lands of essential and superlative natural, ecological, archeological, paleontological, cultural, historical, and wilderness values;

(4)

Joshua Tree National Monument should be enlarged by the addition of contiguous Federal lands of national park caliber, and afforded full recognition and statutory protection as a National Park; and

(5)

the nondesignated wilderness within Joshua Tree should receive statutory protection by designation pursuant to the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.].

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–433, title IV, § 401, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4487.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-433 · 108 Stat. 4487

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-433 on 1994-10-31.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case