ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 410aaa–81bWildlife corridors

submitted 7 years ago by Pub. L. 103-433 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 272 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary must study how breaking up habitat hurts wildlife in the California Desert Conservation Area and set rules to protect wildlife corridors. A detailed study was due within two years of March 12, 2019, and its findings must be built into land management plans.

(a) In general. The Secretary must: (1) assess how habitat fragmentation — breaking wildlife habitat into disconnected pieces — affects wildlife in the California Desert Conservation Area, and (2) set up policies to preserve wildlife corridors and help species migrate. (b) Study. (1) Within 2 years of March 12, 2019, the Secretary must finish a study on habitat fragmentation's impact on wildlife there. (2) The study must: (A) identify species that migrate or are likely to migrate through the area; (B) look at how fragmentation affects plants, insects, and animals; soil; air quality; water quality and quantity; and species migration and survival; (C) identify key wildlife and migration corridors worth preserving; and (D) recommend ways to keep public land connected biologically across land managed by the Secretary and by the Secretary of Defense. (3) When deciding the impact of rights-of-way projects in the area, the Secretary must use this study's findings, following the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and any other applicable law. (c) Land management plans. The Secretary must fold the study's findings and recommendations into every land management plan that applies to the California Desert Conservation Area.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general

The Secretary shall—

(1)

assess the impacts of habitat fragmentation on wildlife in the California Desert Conservation Area; and

(2)

establish policies and procedures to ensure the preservation of wildlife corridors and facilitate species migration.

(b) Study
(1) In general

As soon as practicable, but not later than 2 years, after March 12, 2019, the Secretary shall complete a study regarding the impact of habitat fragmentation on wildlife in the California Desert Conservation Area.

(2) Components

The study under paragraph (1) shall—

(A)

identify the species migrating, or likely to migrate 1 in the California Desert Conservation Area;

(B)

examine the impacts and potential impacts of habitat fragmentation on—

(i)

plants, insects, and animals;

(ii)

soil;

(iii)

air quality;

(iv)

water quality and quantity; and

(v)

species migration and survival;

(C)

identify critical wildlife and species migration corridors recommended for preservation; and

(D)

include recommendations for ensuring the biological connectivity of public land managed by the Secretary and the Secretary of Defense throughout the California Desert Conservation Area.

(3) Rights-of-way

The Secretary shall consider the information and recommendations of the study under paragraph (1) to determine the individual and cumulative impacts of rights-of-way for projects in the California Desert Conservation Area, in accordance with—

(A)

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);

(B)

the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and

(C)

any other applicable law.

(c) Land management plans

The Secretary shall incorporate into all land management plans applicable to the California Desert Conservation Area the findings and recommendations of the study completed under subsection (b).

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–433, title VII, § 713, as added Pub. L. 116–9, title I, § 1452, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 711.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2019Enacted · Pub. L. 103-433 · 133 Stat. 711

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-433 on 2019-03-12.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case