ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 410hh–4Commercial fishing

submitted 46 years ago by Pub. L. 96-487 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 118 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

In three specific areas — Cape Krusenstern National Monument, part of Wrangell-Saint Elias National Preserve, and part of Glacier Bay National Preserve — the Secretary generally cannot restrict existing, valid commercial fishing rights or related use of campsites, cabins, vehicles, and aircraft landings. This protection does not cover activities that a public hearing shows have significantly grown beyond 1979 levels.

In the Cape Krusenstern National Monument, the Malaspina Glacier Forelands part of the Wrangell-Saint Elias National Preserve, and the Dry Bay part of the Glacier Bay National Preserve, the Secretary generally may not unreasonably restrict the use of valid commercial fishing rights or privileges already held under existing law — including the related use of public land for campsites, cabins, motorized vehicles, and landing aircraft on existing airstrips. This protection does not apply to activities that the Secretary, after holding a public hearing in the affected area, finds significantly expand the use of park land beyond what it was used for in 1979.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

With respect to the Cape Krusenstern National Monument, the Malaspina Glacier Forelands area of Wrangell-Saint Elias National Preserve and the Dry Bay area of Glacier Bay National Preserve, the Secretary may take no action to restrict unreasonably the exercise of valid commercial fishing rights or privileges obtained pursuant to existing law, including the use of public lands for campsites, cabins, motorized vehicles, and aircraft landings on existing airstrips, directly incident to the exercise of such rights or privileges except that this prohibition shall not apply to activities which the Secretary, after conducting a public hearing in the affected locality, finds constitute a significant expansion of the use of park lands beyond the level of such use during 1979.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 96–487, title II, § 205, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2384.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1980Enacted · Pub. L. 96-487 · 94 Stat. 2384

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 96-487 on 1980-12-02.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case