ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 460l–31Findings

submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 102-575 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 227 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress explains why it is updating the Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Old rules put unfair costs on local governments and capped federal funding too low. Congress wants to let the Interior Secretary expand recreation facilities and manage Reclamation land better.

Congress makes these findings: (1) The federal government has a responsibility to provide public recreation at federal water projects. (2) Some parts of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act are outdated, because demand for outdoor recreation has grown and the economics of running these facilities have changed. (3) Making local governments pay all the costs of running, maintaining, and replacing recreation facilities is unfair, especially for old or poorly designed facilities. (4) Limiting the federal share of recreation-facility funding to $100,000, for water projects finished before 1965, blocks the federal government from properly funding safe outdoor recreation. (5) The federal government should have authority to expand existing recreation facilities to meet public demand, working with local partners. (6) Nothing in this part changes the Bureau of Reclamation's duty to fulfill the purposes for which its Reclamation projects were originally built. (7) For all these reasons, Congress finds it is in the nation's best interest to amend the Federal Water Project Recreation Act — removing outdated limits and letting the Interior Secretary take specific steps to manage Reclamation land.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The Congress finds and declares the following:

(1)

There is a Federal responsibility to provide opportunities for public recreation at Federal water projects.

(2)

Some provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act [16 U.S.C. 460l–12 et seq.] are outdated because of increases in demand for outdoor recreation and changes in the economic climate for recreation managing entities.

(3)

Provisions of such Act relating to non-Federal responsibility for all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities result in an unfair burden, especially in cases where the facilities are old or underdesigned.

(4)

Provisions of such Act that limit the Federal share of recreation facility development at water projects completed before 1965 to $100,000 preclude a responsible Federal share in providing adequate opportunities for safe outdoor recreation.

(5)

There should be Federal authority to expand existing recreation facilities to meet public demand, in partnership with non-Federal interests.

(6)

Nothing in this part changes the responsibility of the Bureau to meet the purposes for which Federal Reclamation projects were initially authorized and constructed.

(7)

It is therefore in the best interest of the people of this Nation to amend the Federal Water Project Recreation Act [16 U.S.C. 460l–12 et seq.] to remove outdated restrictions and authorize the Secretary of the Interior to undertake specific measures for the management of Reclamation lands.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–575, title XXVIII, § 2802, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4690.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 102-575 · 106 Stat. 4690

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-575 on 1992-10-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case