16 U.S.C. § 460nnn–42 — Cooperative efforts to control development and encourage conservation
submitted 26 years ago by Pub. L. 106-399 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 151 words · no verdicts yet
Congress decided that new development in the Steens Mountain area, if it changes the land's current character, goes against this law's goals. So the Secretary can offer willing landowners conservation easements, technical help, and payments to protect ecological resources. This doesn't override state property law.
Development on public and private lands within the boundaries of the Cooperative Management and Protection Area* which is different from the current character and uses of the lands is inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter.
The Secretary* may enter into a nondevelopment easement* or conservation easement* with willing landowners to further the purposes of this subchapter.
The Secretary may provide technical assistance, cost-share payments, incentive payments, and education to a private landowner in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area who enters into a contract with the Secretary to protect or enhance ecological resources on the private land covered by the contract if those protections or enhancements benefit public lands.
Nothing in this subchapter is intended to affect rights or interests in real property or supersede State law.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 106–399, title I, § 122, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1664.)
- 2000Enacted · Pub. L. 106-399 · 114 Stat. 1664
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 106-399 on 2000-10-30.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case