0
16 U.S.C. § 62 — Possession of dead bodies of birds or animals
submitted 106 years ago by ch. 218 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 44 words · no verdicts yet
in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice
If you're caught inside these parks holding a dead wild bird or animal, or a piece of one, that alone counts as strong evidence you broke the park protection rules. It doesn't prove guilt outright, but it shifts the burden onto you.
This section deals with proof, not with a separate crime. It applies inside the parks named in sections 60 to 63 of this title.
If a person is found in possession of the dead body of a wild bird or animal — or even just part of one, like a pelt or feathers — that possession is 'prima facie evidence' that the person is guilty of violating sections 60 to 63 of this title. 'Prima facie evidence' means evidence that is enough on its face to prove the point unless the person offers some explanation or rebuttal. So this section makes it easier for prosecutors: simply finding the dead animal or bird parts on someone is enough by itself to support a violation charge, unless the person can show otherwise.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
Possession within said parks, or either of them, of the dead bodies or any part thereof of any wild bird or animal shall be prima facie evidence that person or persons having same are guilty of violating sections 60 to 63 of this title.
Source credit: (June 2, 1920, ch. 218, § 5, 41 Stat. 732.)
history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
- 1920Enacted · Act of June 2, 1920, ch. 218 · 41 Stat. 732
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 218 on 1920-06-02.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case