ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 79kMitigation of adverse economic impacts to local economy resulting from additional lands; analysis of Federal actions necessary or desirable; consultations and considerations by Secretaries concerned; reports to Congress; implementation of programs; funding requirements

submitted 48 years ago by Pub. L. 95-250 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 467 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary, working with the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, had to study how adding land to Redwood National Park would hurt the local economy and report to Congress by January 1, 1979. Commerce and Labor then had to use existing programs to reduce job losses and other economic harm in Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, funded only as Congress separately appropriated.

(a) The Secretary, working with the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, had to study what federal steps might be needed to reduce economic harm to local businesses and workers — other than the landowners already being paid for their taken property — caused by adding land to Redwood National Park under sections 79b and 79c. They also had to consider giving grants or signing contracts or agreements with California or Del Norte and Humboldt Counties to fund forest-improvement programs — things like replanting, erosion control, other forest conservation, fish and wildlife habitat improvements, and wood-energy facilities. By January 1, 1979, the Secretary had to send Congress a report on this analysis, including recommendations for reducing the short-term and long-term harm to the local economy. (b) The Secretaries of Commerce and Labor, working with the Secretary and using that study, had to apply existing programs to further reduce the job losses and other economic harm to the local economy — not counting the fair compensation already paid to landowners under this Act or the 1968 Act. Beyond the land-restoration and jobs provisions elsewhere in this law, which were expected to help the local economy substantially, the Secretaries of Commerce and Labor also had to use their existing legal authority to set up employment programs — through grants, contracts, and agreements with federal agencies, California, local governments, nonprofits, businesses, or individuals — to create jobs for people affected by the land taking and to help revive the Del Norte and Humboldt County economies. Starting October 1, 1978, Congress could appropriate whatever money was needed for these jobs and economic-relief programs, but only to the extent Congress actually provided that money in advance through appropriations.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, and Labor, shall conduct an analysis of appropriate Federal actions that may be necessary or desirable to mitigate any adverse economic impacts to public and private segments of the local economy, other than the owners of properties taken by this Act, as a result of the addition of property to Redwood National Park under sections 79b and 79c of this title. The Secretaries shall also consider the benefits of making grants or entering into contracts or cooperative agreements with the State of California or Del Norte and Humboldt Counties as provided by subsection (b) for the purpose of development and implementation of a program of forest resource improvement and utilization, including, but not limited to, reforestation, erosion control, and other forest land conservation measures, fisheries and fish and wildlife habitat improvements, and wood energy facilities. Not later than January 1, 1979, the Secretary shall submit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate a report of his analysis, including his recommendations with respect to actions that should be taken to mitigate any significant short-term and long-term adverse effects on the local economy caused by such addition.

(b)

The Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Labor, in consultation with the Secretary, and pursuant to his study, shall apply such existing programs as are necessary and appropriate to further mitigate identified employment and other adverse economic impacts on public and private segments of the local economy, other than with regard to the payment of just compensation to the owners of properties taken by this Act and by the Act of October 2, 1968 [16 U.S.C. 79a et seq.]. In addition to the land rehabilitation and employment provisions of this Act, which should have a substantial positive economic effect on the local economy, the Secretaries of Commerce and Labor are further authorized and directed to implement existing authorities to establish employment programs, pursuant to such grants, contracts and cooperative agreements with agencies of the Federal Executive, the State of California, any political or governmental subdivision thereof, any corporation, not-for-profit corporation, private entity or person, for the development and implementation of such programs, as, in the discretion of the Secretaries of Commerce and Labor, may be necessary to provide employment opportunities to those individuals affected by this taking and to contribute to the economic revival of Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, in northern California. Effective on October 1, 1978, there are authorized such sums as may be necessary to carry out the employment and economic mitigation provisions of this Act: Provided, That the authority to make payments under this section shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 95–250, title I, § 102(a), (b), Mar. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 166, 167.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1978Enacted · Pub. L. 95-250 · 92 Stat. 166, 167

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-250 on 1978-03-27.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case